i would lean more towards edwards.
i still have my doubgs about dodd
all of them has good positions with regard what interests me the more.

Yes, it will be easier for me when there are fewer candidates and more is clear about the positions of each... as you may remember I was volunteering for Obama but I wasn't really happy with the depth of the positions that the campaign was distributing... so for now I will wait and see like everyone else...

i agree with u
for now we have too many of them

Mig,
So, how did this debate go?

I'd be interested to hear your opinion

They knew they audience, and they were trying to simpathyze with them. However, from all of them Edwards for me was the most coherent.
The questions focused basically in immigration, Iraq, and healthcare.
He delineated a program of immigration which i support. We need to know who is entering the country therefore, we need more control in the borders. But a wall it's just a non-sense.
then he proposed to solve the actual problem with the 12 million of immigrants legalizing them, Furthermore, he is thinking in policies to help Latin American countries, so their people don't have to come here in such a way. The people instead of coming here will work in their countries. And make easier for people who want to come here as temporary workers.
that is a comprehensive policy. no the nonsense the republicans are proposing

So, how did the press receive it?

Was Edwards a winner in their eyes too?

not much
as Anoasis mentioned Dodd was it
i'm just giving my personal view

it sounds sensible.

Makes a change

i would vote for him