100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Obama Threatens Congress, I Have a Pen | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath?
doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 01/16/14 03:00 PM
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy, an American citizen, and his friends at a BBQ That is a power claimed only by tyrants and dictators.... or the god of most men..... so which right does he claim? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy, an American citizen, and his friends at a BBQ That is a power claimed only by tyrants and dictators.... or the god of most mean..... so what right does he claim? There is no anti-dote for ObozAid (TM) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy and his friends at a BBQ that wasn't the question let me rephrase if the constitution outlines the responsiblilities of the branches of government and in the OATH it refers specifically to executing the OFFICE OF PRESIDENT doesn't that , by definition, imply that he will be carrying out those responsibilities outlined in the constitution? why would he/she need to redundant by spelling out those duties again in their oath? a US President has their authority/responsibilities outlined in the Constitution, by swearing to preserve it, they are making an oath to adhere to it,,,aren't they? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy, an American citizen, and his friends at a BBQ That is a power claimed only by tyrants and dictators.... or the god of most mean..... so what right does he claim? There is no anti-dote for ObozAid (TM) personal attacks may be a sign someone has no relevant information to contribute to refute an argument,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 01/16/14 03:18 PM
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy and his friends at a BBQ that wasn't the question let me rephrase if the constitution outlines the responsiblilities of the branches of government and in the OATH it refers specifically to executing the OFFICE OF PRESIDENT doesn't that , by definition, imply that he will be carrying out those responsibilities outlined in the constitution? why would he/she need to redundant by spelling out those duties again in their oath? a US President has their authority/responsibilities outlined in the Constitution, by swearing to preserve it, they are making an oath to adhere to it,,,aren't they? Defending the constitution and the peoples rights under it does not mean imposing mandates, restrictions or controlling. His job is overseeing the protection of those rights, defense of the nation, and making sure the legislative and judicial branches protect those same rights of the people they ALL swore and oath to protect and defend......not dictating what those rights are Bills are created in the House, passed or sent back by the Senate, and made law by the Executive. The POTUS has no power to create laws! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy and his friends at a BBQ that wasn't the question let me rephrase if the constitution outlines the responsiblilities of the branches of government and in the OATH it refers specifically to executing the OFFICE OF PRESIDENT doesn't that , by definition, imply that he will be carrying out those responsibilities outlined in the constitution? why would he/she need to redundant by spelling out those duties again in their oath? a US President has their authority/responsibilities outlined in the Constitution, by swearing to preserve it, they are making an oath to adhere to it,,,aren't they? Defending the constitution and the peoples rights under it does not mean imposing mandates, restrictions or controlling. His job is overseeing the protection of those rights, defense of the nation, and making sure the legislative and judicial branches protect those same rights of the people they ALL swore and oath to protect and defend......not dictating what those rights are Bills are created in the House, passed or sent back by the Senate, and made law by the Executive. The POTUS has no power to create laws! I agree but the potus can manage the office of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH with 'orders' that assist in the proper execution of the 'laws' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy and his friends at a BBQ that wasn't the question let me rephrase if the constitution outlines the responsiblilities of the branches of government and in the OATH it refers specifically to executing the OFFICE OF PRESIDENT doesn't that , by definition, imply that he will be carrying out those responsibilities outlined in the constitution? why would he/she need to redundant by spelling out those duties again in their oath? a US President has their authority/responsibilities outlined in the Constitution, by swearing to preserve it, they are making an oath to adhere to it,,,aren't they? Defending the constitution and the peoples rights under it does not mean imposing mandates, restrictions or controlling. His job is overseeing the protection of those rights, defense of the nation, and making sure the legislative and judicial branches protect those same rights of the people they ALL swore and oath to protect and defend......not dictating what those rights are Bills are created in the House, passed or sent back by the Senate, and made law by the Executive. The POTUS has no power to create laws! I agree but the potus can manage the office of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH with 'orders' that assist in the proper execution of the 'laws' A law is a law as it is writen. Not to be changed by the stroke of a pen by anyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy and his friends at a BBQ that wasn't the question let me rephrase if the constitution outlines the responsiblilities of the branches of government and in the OATH it refers specifically to executing the OFFICE OF PRESIDENT doesn't that , by definition, imply that he will be carrying out those responsibilities outlined in the constitution? why would he/she need to redundant by spelling out those duties again in their oath? a US President has their authority/responsibilities outlined in the Constitution, by swearing to preserve it, they are making an oath to adhere to it,,,aren't they? Defending the constitution and the peoples rights under it does not mean imposing mandates, restrictions or controlling. His job is overseeing the protection of those rights, defense of the nation, and making sure the legislative and judicial branches protect those same rights of the people they ALL swore and oath to protect and defend......not dictating what those rights are Bills are created in the House, passed or sent back by the Senate, and made law by the Executive. The POTUS has no power to create laws! I agree but the potus can manage the office of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH with 'orders' that assist in the proper execution of the 'laws' A law is a law as it is writen. Not to be changed by the stroke of a pen by anyone. no kidding do we have an example of an order that 'changed' the law,,? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't the constitution OUTLINE the things the oath doesn't specifically mention,, therefore making those things also part of the oath? doctors don't take oaths that state specifically they will 'save lives' or 'reduce pain',,,, but its part of their job when they 'do no harm' Drs aren't responsible for defending the rights of the nation.... so get a clue! Their oath is to do no harm and preserve life. Obozo claims the right to take life at his whim, without due process....and has done so, even that of an innocent 18 year old boy and his friends at a BBQ that wasn't the question let me rephrase if the constitution outlines the responsiblilities of the branches of government and in the OATH it refers specifically to executing the OFFICE OF PRESIDENT doesn't that , by definition, imply that he will be carrying out those responsibilities outlined in the constitution? why would he/she need to redundant by spelling out those duties again in their oath? a US President has their authority/responsibilities outlined in the Constitution, by swearing to preserve it, they are making an oath to adhere to it,,,aren't they? Defending the constitution and the peoples rights under it does not mean imposing mandates, restrictions or controlling. His job is overseeing the protection of those rights, defense of the nation, and making sure the legislative and judicial branches protect those same rights of the people they ALL swore and oath to protect and defend......not dictating what those rights are Bills are created in the House, passed or sent back by the Senate, and made law by the Executive. The POTUS has no power to create laws! No, but he can issue an Executive Order which can sometimes be more dangerous and he can make recess appointments, which Obama has done while Congress is in session. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
executive orders are regular to the office of President,,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 01/17/14 07:50 AM
|
|
executive orders are regular to the office of President,,,, Regular does not necessarily mean "Lawful" or "Constitutional"! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
executive orders are regular to the office of President,,,, Regular does not necessarily mean "Lawful" or "Constitutional"! They can also be pretty dangerous and disastrous in the hands of a narcissistic $hithead like Obama. In Obama's case the pen is mightier then the sword. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And here's what Obama said a couple of years ago...
Quote: “I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own,” Obama told La Raza conference attendees at the Washington Marriott Wardman Park. “Believe me, right now, dealing with Congress, the idea of doing this on my own is very tempting — not just on immigration reform.” Some Hispanic leaders have urged Obama to use his executive authority to slow deportation of illegal immigrants, something the president has been unwilling to do. He reiterated that discomfort on Monday, saying end-runs around Congress are “not how our system works.” He does it so much, he even lies to himself... 
|
|
|
|
|
