100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Are women more susceptible to philistinism than men? | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
SDSCFof2
on
Fri 10/25/13 07:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? Please explain what back to basics entails? Men in leopard skin frocks, wielding a club, like Fred Flintstone? Or a loincloth like Johnny Weissmuller? There's a guy at my school who goes around in a kilt....I cringe to imagine what's underneath it, or rather what's not....  your bad..lol
someone mention Jonny Weissmuller..I loved him! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? Please explain what back to basics entails? Men in leopard skin frocks, wielding a club, like Fred Flintstone? Or a loincloth like Johnny Weissmuller? There's a guy at my school who goes around in a kilt....I cringe to imagine what's underneath it, or rather what's not.... Haha, I take it he's not attractive. I can appreciate a man in kilt, but he's gotta look the part and definitely needs to have the legs for it, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think?
yeah, me too: "Huh????" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
explain PhilistiOhHeckWhatever!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
loovedoove
on
Sat 10/26/13 07:35 AM
|
|
The reactions to red6mist or whatever he is calling himself these days, is hilarious as usual. Once again everyone thanks for the entertainment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You gotta feel for the guy though Kinda like Wile E. Coyote going after the roadrunner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You gotta feel for the guy though Kinda like Wile E. Coyote going after the roadrunner.
Well...the difference in this case is Wile E. Coyote had a certain amount of intelligence, his plans were just not well thought out. Wile E. Coyote was attempting to satisfy his natural instinct to hunt and eat hence his motivation. Not exactly sure what drives red6mist but again he is truly entertaining  He is like a time bomb ready to explode lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You gotta feel for the guy though Kinda like Wile E. Coyote going after the roadrunner.
Well...the difference in this case is Wile E. Coyote had a certain amount of intelligence, his plans were just not well thought out. Wile E. Coyote was attempting to satisfy his natural instinct to hunt and eat hence his motivation. Not exactly sure what drives red6mist but again he is truly entertaining He is like a time bomb ready to explode lol
Only difference I see is it is a different animal instinct at work here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? Please explain what back to basics entails? Men in leopard skin frocks, wielding a club, like Fred Flintstone? Or a loincloth like Johnny Weissmuller?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? Please explain what back to basics entails? Men in leopard skin frocks, wielding a club, like Fred Flintstone? Or a loincloth like Johnny Weissmuller?
Evidently RedMist doesn't!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lionsbrew
dcastelmissy larsson71 You guys are hilariously wicked lol 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
SparklingCrystal ππ
on
Sat 10/26/13 08:39 AM
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men.Β
You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down.Β I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? Well, to rip this apart: - physiognomy has nothing much to do with aesthetics. -οΏ½οΏ½ All great artist were men as women had to do the laundry, raise 18 children, cook and clean and at night spread her legs for nr 19. Not much time to think about using Yellow Ochre and Van Dyke brown or using a large chisel for the marble. -οΏ½οΏ½ We have to resort to below average looking guys as the metro-man who groomed, has gone out of style, made redundant or labelled "queer"οΏ½οΏ½. - The macho man has gone extinct, not cos of feminism but by letting their boys with toys attitude prevail over masculinity. GTA5, COD, MOHAA, CS are now more important than impressing a lady. -οΏ½οΏ½ You cannot blame feminism for men being too lazy to work on their masculinity. Men chose to limit themselves to training biceps only: left one by lifting beer cans, right one by "οΏ½οΏ½talking"οΏ½οΏ½ to the hand, preferably simultaneously. @ Larsson: rumour has it that Mona Lisa was Leonardo himself As for handing him over to me, not a bad idea. I'm sure I can mold him into shape. By the time I'll hand him back over, he'll be wearing tight black boxers, leather trousers, he'll know how to treat a woman, be respectful and embrace feminism for allowing him to be such a cool guy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? Please explain what back to basics entails? Men in leopard skin frocks, wielding a club, like Fred Flintstone? Or a loincloth like Johnny Weissmuller? There's a guy at my school who goes around in a kilt....I cringe to imagine what's underneath it, or rather what's not.... Haha, I take it he's not attractive. I can appreciate a man in kilt, but he's gotta look the part and definitely needs to have the legs for it,
Nope, he's not attractive. Also, I'm not used to seeing men in kilts, I like guys in jeans and tee shirts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think women appreciate the science of physiognomy as much as men do. For example, all the great artists have been men. You always hear women talking about what's on the inside as opposed to what's on the outside. I think they put too much emphasis on personality and not enough on aesthetics. Which is why you often see below average looking guys going out with highly attractive women. They have never had it so good. In the past they were shoved aside to make way for men that were more macho and better looking. But now feminism has ruined everything. It has turned the natural order of things upside down. I think it's time we got back to basics. What do you think? Please explain what back to basics entails? Men in leopard skin frocks, wielding a club, like Fred Flintstone? Or a loincloth like Johnny Weissmuller? There's a guy at my school who goes around in a kilt....I cringe to imagine what's underneath it, or rather what's not.... Haha, I take it he's not attractive. I can appreciate a man in kilt, but he's gotta look the part and definitely needs to have the legs for it,
Nope, he's not attractive. Also, I'm not used to seeing men in kilts, I like guys in jeans and tee shirts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that's why I don't get why a guy would actually choose to wear one of those things. Luckily this was back in the summer, but still....also, when I came home I was covered with mosquito bites because I kept wearing skirts, so I can only imagine how he must have gotten bitten; I was wearing panties, he wasn't!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wore a kilt as I was best man at my mates wedding and wore nothing as you're supposed to do under it? Never again! An icy gust of wind later and my nuts had retracted that far into my body that I had 3 adams apples!!! And there's me thinking you did the roofing in a kilt ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think I'd like any guy in a kilt, I'm a bit sexist; skirts are for ladies....
|
|
|
|
|
