Topic: Zimmerman Murder case | |
---|---|
how can any person or medium possibly cover EVERY case of death, or murder or anything else in the WORLD
And why would anyone want to waste their time doing that? ,,,,cant people determine that that's not practical or realistic to expect?
People are memorized by the media. They can't determine much of anything. The Media chooses what they will focus on. That is called hypnotism. They work to keep the dumbed down public and boob tube watchers glued to the set so they don't noticed what is happening in the world and in the country. |
|
|
|
and that's what coverage of TRIALS is for,,lol people have a pretty reasonable desire to see how the courts handle things what on earth is the problem with that? if it wasn't for the fact a family had a child shot and no charges seemed to be imminent, we would not have heard about this case,,, The problem with that is funneled info! If you want to talk about one case of assault or death you must talk about them all or your opinions are biased! oh nonsense how can any person or medium possibly cover EVERY case of death, or murder or anything else in the WORLD ,,,,cant people determine that that's not practical or realistic to expect? So you are saying that if it doesn't have a vehicle for racism, prejudice or a gov't agenda every other death shouldn't receive as much attention? NOW THAT'S NONSENSE! Im saying, the reading comprehension in these threads has no words,,,lol I didn't say ANYTHING about 'vehicle for racism',,blah blah blah I said its nonsense that we cant concern ourself with/talk about one case without talking about ALL CASES,,, |
|
|
|
If dead thug was white would non-whites want justice for the family? ask the families of the boston bombers,, Id say a cry for justice happens across racial lines,,, |
|
|
|
and that's what coverage of TRIALS is for,,lol people have a pretty reasonable desire to see how the courts handle things what on earth is the problem with that? if it wasn't for the fact a family had a child shot and no charges seemed to be imminent, we would not have heard about this case,,, That is not the reason we heard about this case. This case is about the government's effort to convince people that only the cops and the government should be toting guns. But more importantly, it is a distraction from the many things the government does not want the Media or the public to focus on. What they allow the media to report and focus on is a bunch of pretty meaningless events. Yes meaningless. The outcome of this particular case does very little to effect National or world events. It is being made into a drama that keeps the public's eyes away from government corruption, war mongering, government sponsored terrorism by the Arming Al Queada rebels, Benghazi, invasion of our privacy, and all that crucially important stuff that is happening to this country. And yet people sit like zombies and watch this stupid trial. well, I don't agree that trying to get justice for a dead kid is stupid,,,, or that it was some collective 'government' idea to seek justice it was two parents who wanted to make sure their kid got justice so they took it to those who could get a spotlight pur on it,,, with everyone watching, people try harder to appear they are making an attempt at justice its not a pointless trial to me nor is it to many parents a meaningless trial,,,it , like many trials, has the potential to set a PRECEDENT,,,, so, like I said, its a matter of whats important to each individual, and because it may not be important to some, doesn't make it stupid of others for whom it is,,,, its personal priorities about what matters and doesn't matter,, justice for this kid matters to many,, and I don't find that stupid at all,, You missed the point completely. And you seem to be mesmerized by this trial. And it is a meaningless waste of time to watch. I don't see any potential to set any precedents. The media is grasping at straws trying to make this exploitation sound important. It is not. "injustice" is rampant and it is usually ignored by the media most of the time. The Media is told what it will exploit and the parents had nothing to do with that. They were just lucky. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 07/12/13 10:18 AM
|
|
not sure what indicates I am 'mesmerized' merely because I am watching a trial
but whatever,, I am interested, the precedent is anyones child,, anyone can walk alone at night , be followed, and now not have a legally justified option to fight if they are in danger because the other person may be able to just shoot them and get away with it,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 07/12/13 10:32 AM
|
|
and that's what coverage of TRIALS is for,,lol people have a pretty reasonable desire to see how the courts handle things what on earth is the problem with that? if it wasn't for the fact a family had a child shot and no charges seemed to be imminent, we would not have heard about this case,,, The problem with that is funneled info! If you want to talk about one case of assault or death you must talk about them all or your opinions are biased! oh nonsense how can any person or medium possibly cover EVERY case of death, or murder or anything else in the WORLD ,,,,cant people determine that that's not practical or realistic to expect? So you are saying that if it doesn't have a vehicle for racism, prejudice or a gov't agenda every other death shouldn't receive as much attention? NOW THAT'S NONSENSE! Im saying, the reading comprehension in these threads has no words,,,lol I didn't say ANYTHING about 'vehicle for racism',,blah blah blah I said its nonsense that we cant concern ourself with/talk about one case without talking about ALL CASES,,, That's a burning bag of p00p on a doorstep, smacks of racial overtone, and hardly deserves comment since the only reason this made news, or even came to trial, was because of an O statement..... "If I had a son....." He's killed more than one dark skinned male child in foreign lands....how many of them could fit that bill and why isn't it televised? Oh wait! IT WAS!...... By Bradley Manning! |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Fri 07/12/13 10:33 AM
|
|
not sure what indicates I am 'mesmerized' merely because I am watching a trial but whatever,, I am interested, the precedent is anyones child,, anyone can walk alone at night , be followed, and now not have a legally justified option to fight if they are in danger because the other person may be able to just shoot them and get away with it,,, Sorry for using the term. I am reading a lot of books on 'mind tricks' and hypnotism and propaganda etc. and I can see that the media is giving this trial too much attention. Perhaps they don't have permission to report other more important news items. But in doing so, that is all people are seeing, as far as the news on television is concerned, hence they are mesmerized. It simply means that their attention is sort of fixed on that. Personally I an sick to death of hearing about it and I am only flipping channels. Its all over the place. I see that you identify with the victim and that it might mean that walking alone at night is dangerous. Yep it probably is, depending on where you are. |
|
|
|
From CNN.com:
Whatever the six-woman jury mulling the fate Friday of George Zimmerman decides, the former neighborhood watch volunteer charged with second-degree murder in the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin cannot emerge as a winner, according to his defense attorney.
Asked Wednesday what kind of life Zimmerman would lead if he were acquitted, Mark O'Mara told CNN's Martin Savidge "not a good one." "He has to live mostly in hiding, he has to protect himself from that periphery that still believe that he's some racist murderer or acted in a bad way," O'Mara said. "I think that he's probably concerned about living in central Florida and never having a normal life, and that's unfortunate. His life will never be the same." |
|
|
|
All he needs to do is grow a beard, change his name, and he will melt into obscurity forever.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 07/12/13 08:05 PM
|
|
People are tuning out! No wonder they want control of the internet!
Virtually No One in the Country is Following the George Zimmerman Trial Based on TV News Ratings Opposite of what MSM would have you believe, virtually no one is tuning into cable news these days to follow the George Zimmerman Trial. Look at the ratings numbers, they're pitiful; The highest one is barely 2,000,000 viewers! http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/07/12/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-july-11-2013/191682/ |
|
|
|
and that's what coverage of TRIALS is for,,lol people have a pretty reasonable desire to see how the courts handle things what on earth is the problem with that? if it wasn't for the fact a family had a child shot and no charges seemed to be imminent, we would not have heard about this case,,, The problem with that is funneled info! If you want to talk about one case of assault or death you must talk about them all or your opinions are biased! oh nonsense how can any person or medium possibly cover EVERY case of death, or murder or anything else in the WORLD ,,,,cant people determine that that's not practical or realistic to expect? So you are saying that if it doesn't have a vehicle for racism, prejudice or a gov't agenda every other death shouldn't receive as much attention? NOW THAT'S NONSENSE! Im saying, the reading comprehension in these threads has no words,,,lol I didn't say ANYTHING about 'vehicle for racism',,blah blah blah I said its nonsense that we cant concern ourself with/talk about one case without talking about ALL CASES,,, That's a burning bag of p00p on a doorstep, smacks of racial overtone, and hardly deserves comment since the only reason this made news, or even came to trial, was because of an O statement..... "If I had a son....." He's killed more than one dark skinned male child in foreign lands....how many of them could fit that bill and why isn't it televised? Oh wait! IT WAS!...... By Bradley Manning! yeah,, its all obamas fault again,,,,,, anyway,,,,, |
|
|
|
All he needs to do is grow a beard, change his name, and he will melt into obscurity forever. something we can agree on there are always new tragedies to focus on, he has a plain enough appearance that just loosing weight and changing his name after a few months should allow him to carry on just fine,,, |
|
|
|
People are tuning out! No wonder they want control of the internet! Virtually No One in the Country is Following the George Zimmerman Trial Based on TV News Ratings Opposite of what MSM would have you believe, virtually no one is tuning into cable news these days to follow the George Zimmerman Trial. Look at the ratings numbers, they're pitiful; The highest one is barely 2,000,000 viewers! http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/07/12/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-july-11-2013/191682/ so, the media and the government ARENT in a conspiracy to distract people by covering this trial? so,, there ARE other things that people can and ARE watching? |
|
|
|
zimmerman should already be in prison for this... this trial is just a waste of time and money...
|
|
|
|
zimmerman should already be in prison for this... this trial is just a waste of time and money... whatever happens, at least there was a trial Im not exactly going to rejoice one way or the other, but I will feel some relief for the Martin family if he is found guilty,, |
|
|
|
zimmerman should already be in prison for this... this trial is just a waste of time and money... whatever happens, at least there was a trial Im not exactly going to rejoice one way or the other, but I will feel some relief for the Martin family if he is found guilty,, shooting an unarmed kid for no reason? i fail to see what the trial is for... the family should sue zimmerman in a wrongful death case too... |
|
|
|
zimmerman should already be in prison for this... this trial is just a waste of time and money... whatever happens, at least there was a trial Im not exactly going to rejoice one way or the other, but I will feel some relief for the Martin family if he is found guilty,, shooting an unarmed kid for no reason? i fail to see what the trial is for... the family should sue zimmerman in a wrongful death case too... playing devils advocate, his reason claims to be this severe beating he allegedly got that put him in what he claims is a reasonable fear of great injury or death many seem to side with him I think its bs but its up to the jury to decide,,,, |
|
|
|
zimmerman should already be in prison for this... this trial is just a waste of time and money... whatever happens, at least there was a trial Im not exactly going to rejoice one way or the other, but I will feel some relief for the Martin family if he is found guilty,, shooting an unarmed kid for no reason? i fail to see what the trial is for... the family should sue zimmerman in a wrongful death case too... playing devils advocate, his reason claims to be this severe beating he allegedly got that put him in what he claims is a reasonable fear of great injury or death many seem to side with him I think its bs but its up to the jury to decide,,,, i don't buy that either... zimmerman had no reason to even talk to that kid, much less kill him... |
|
|
|
zimmerman should already be in prison for this... this trial is just a waste of time and money... whatever happens, at least there was a trial Im not exactly going to rejoice one way or the other, but I will feel some relief for the Martin family if he is found guilty,, shooting an unarmed kid for no reason? i fail to see what the trial is for... the family should sue zimmerman in a wrongful death case too... playing devils advocate, his reason claims to be this severe beating he allegedly got that put him in what he claims is a reasonable fear of great injury or death many seem to side with him I think its bs but its up to the jury to decide,,,, i don't buy that either... zimmerman had no reason to even talk to that kid, much less kill him... you me and everyone I know outside this forum thinks so if t was suspicious to z, how much more 'suspicious' must z have seemed to t,,,,,I still cant even imagine those last moments,,, but,, its up to the jurors now,,, |
|
|
|
if t was suspicious to z, how much more 'suspicious' must z have seemed to t,,,,,I still cant even imagine those last moments,,, but,, its up to the jurors now,,, That Martin may have mistaken Zimmerman for a mugger escapes the attention of some people. |
|
|