Topic: Funny Stuff. Hood Rat Mama Gets a Tazing | |
---|---|
What did you think about how the ghetto dog acted in the video? so sorry, I havent brushed up on my slurs lately,,,,lol what is a ghetto dog again? |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 02/14/13 03:21 AM
|
|
This is the kind of thing that makes you feel proud about being a taxpayer. A real warm fuzzy feeling. I was speaking to an emergency room physician this morning. He told me that a woman in her 20’s came to the ER with her 8th pregnancy. She stated “my momma told me that I am the breadwinner for the family.” He asked her to explain. She said that she can make babies and babies get money for the family. The scam goes like this: The grandma calls the Department of Child and Family Services and states that the unemployed daughter is not capable of caring for these children. DCFS agrees and states that the child or children will need to go to foster care. The grandma then volunteers to be the foster parent, and thus receives a check for $1500 per child per month in Illinois. Total yearly income: $144,000 tax-free, not to mention free healthcare (Medicaid) plus a monthly “Linx” card entitling her to free groceries, etc., and a voucher for 250 free cell phone minutes per month. This does not even include WIC and other welfare programs. Indeed, grandma was correct in that her fertile daughter is the “breadwinner” in the family. I hope you share this story with your contacts so they know how the ruling class spends your tax dollars. Sebastian J. Ciancio, M.D. Urologist, Danville Polyclinic, LTD. 1st. Dont spend too much time worrying about it. No SYSTEM Is loophole/scam proof and this 'story' would be more of an exception than the rule for several reasons the girls age would mean she had to be having kids at least once a year since 12, which in most cases would have had her removed from her mothers care long ago, as well as the mothers credibility when requesting to foster other children,,, foster payments are for the care of the children and would disqualify, by definition, the caretaker from any other 'welfare' program administered by the state maximum income for a family of 8 to receive welfare in illinois is around 7000 per month, or less than 1000 per child,, a 1500 dollar a month per child income would disqualify one from any type of welfare in Illinois and last but not least, as one who has raised children, having 8 children , all under the age of 8, is a full time responsibility that even 150 grand doesnt adequately compensate |
|
|
|
In the video, the real topic, racial slurs are thrown all around.
Of all the persons involved, he only sane acting and polite person was Security. Why is the fat broad not condemned for slinging slurs. I add colour to the topic and my posts are race baiting and uncalled for. Is it because a non-negro added the flavor to the thread? Tell me, please, how do ya'll feel about how the representation in the video. Do they honor their race? Are they great parents? Do they make for a wholesome society? |
|
|
|
In the video, the real topic, racial slurs are thrown all around. Of all the persons involved, he only sane acting and polite person was Security. Why is the fat broad not condemned for slinging slurs. I add colour to the topic and my posts are race baiting and uncalled for. Is it because a non-negro added the flavor to the thread? Tell me, please, how do ya'll feel about how the representation in the video. Do they honor their race? Are they great parents? Do they make for a wholesome society? they were loud, embarassing, and immature and foul they gave great fodder to racists who would use them to represent a whole group, be it race, region, or whatever they are terrible role models for their kids they are a part of the society we have, where people have so many great 'freedoms' , including acting immature and being racist,,, |
|
|
|
In the video, the real topic, racial slurs are thrown all around. Of all the persons involved, he only sane acting and polite person was Security. Why is the fat broad not condemned for slinging slurs. I add colour to the topic and my posts are race baiting and uncalled for. Is it because a non-negro added the flavor to the thread? Tell me, please, how do ya'll feel about how the representation in the video. Do they honor their race? Are they great parents? Do they make for a wholesome society? they were loud, embarassing, and immature and foul they gave great fodder to racists who would use them to represent a whole group, be it race, region, or whatever they are terrible role models for their kids they are a part of the society we have, where people have so many great 'freedoms' , including acting immature and being racist,,, Are you saying, the fat broad is racist for slingin' the n***** word at Security? If not, please, explain how racism works for us, please. |
|
|
|
willing2, Sir, the derogatory comments that you made about the people in the video are being interpreted by others as being racial slurs. Perhaps you didn't have anything racial in mind when you made those comments, but a racial message is what others have received from your comments.
During my business communication course in college, I was taught that a speaker has to make sure that the message received by an audience is the message that the speaker intended to give. You could have criticized the behavior of the people in the video without making derogatory comments. Had you done that, then others would not have received the wrong message. I will admit that I, too, make communication errors that result in the wrong message being received. Whenever I do that, I have to admit to making an error and then correct it. I don't want you to be wrongfully accused of racism if you don't practice it. Already way too many people are wrongfully accused of racism by others who see everything through a prism of race (which, to me, is an act of racism). Sure, one of the women in the video made racial slurs, and it was wrong for her to do that. Anyway, getting back to the original topic, nobody responding to the OP has defended the bad behavior seen in the video. Thus far, everyone here agrees that the women in the video were setting a bad example for the children in the video. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 02/14/13 08:55 PM
|
|
In the video, the real topic, racial slurs are thrown all around. Of all the persons involved, he only sane acting and polite person was Security. Why is the fat broad not condemned for slinging slurs. I add colour to the topic and my posts are race baiting and uncalled for. Is it because a non-negro added the flavor to the thread? Tell me, please, how do ya'll feel about how the representation in the video. Do they honor their race? Are they great parents? Do they make for a wholesome society? they were loud, embarassing, and immature and foul they gave great fodder to racists who would use them to represent a whole group, be it race, region, or whatever they are terrible role models for their kids they are a part of the society we have, where people have so many great 'freedoms' , including acting immature and being racist,,, Are you saying, the fat broad is racist for slingin' the n***** word at Security? If not, please, explain how racism works for us, please. I said she was foul if you dont know why ***** is offensive, its probably best to use some of the other thousands of words in the english language, or the persons name people in close circles can use terms that those outside the circle cannot,,,because of the context and history,,,, its probably taken different when joe bob calls his neighbor an sob for beating him at skeetshooting than it is if leroy from harlem comes to town and calls that same neigbor an sob,,,, |
|
|
|
people in close circles can use terms that those outside the circle cannot
It seems to me that you are using a double standard. Oh, well. You wouldn't be the first to do so. |
|
|
|
people in close circles can use terms that those outside the circle cannot
It seems to me that you are using a double standard. Oh, well. You wouldn't be the first to do so. On point. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 02/15/13 08:42 PM
|
|
people in close circles can use terms that those outside the circle cannot
It seems to me that you are using a double standard. Oh, well. You wouldn't be the first to do so. its not a double standard, its a thing called 'context', we learn in elementary how it can decide the meaning of a word,,,, its the same activity if a man has sex with his wife after both getting trashed as if he does with a stranger who has gotten trashedd,,,the SIMILARITY of the activity is there, but the appropriateness is decidedly different,,, the familiarity of the husband and wife makes it reasonable for him to assume her consent is there , the infamiliarity of the stranger makes it a crime for him to do the same, not a double standard, a reasonable assessment of the details and context,,,, my mother doesnt like us to call her by her name although strangers can ,the RELATIONSHIP changes the context and appropriateness.. and the list goes on strange to me that anyone would feel so,,,anxious, about not being 'able' to use those terms with complete strangers,,,,, what those in close circles have built a history allowing between each other, doesnt concern me in the least,,,, |
|
|
|
Then, there's no reason for panties to wad when I speak ghetto.
I don't need a pass, I make my on trail. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 02/16/13 08:02 AM
|
|
Then, there's no reason for panties to wad when I speak ghetto. I don't need a pass, I make my on trail. whoever said you needed a pass,,,? LOL,,, happens too many times in these threads to come to that conclusion if you belong to a close circle of 'ghetto' people,, thats your business , but this forum isnt that ghetto,, ,,,just a hint,,, its an entirely different circle,,, |
|
|
|
I will post as I feel fit. Hint.
I support others who say screw PC and wanna-be PC policia. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 02/16/13 11:19 AM
|
|
I will post as I feel fit. Hint. I support others who say screw PC and wanna-be PC policia. we all post as we feel I dont support ignorance, but I support the right of the ignorant to show their colors,,,and the right of others to point it out,,, |
|
|
|
Yep.
That video is slap full of ignorance, no? I am also, bi-lingual. I can speak Spanish, northern english, southern english and a little ghetto. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Ras427
on
Sat 02/16/13 03:48 PM
|
|
Yep. That video is slap full of ignorance, no? I am also, bi-lingual. I can speak Spanish, northern english, southern english and a little ghetto. |
|
|
|
Yep. That video is slap full of ignorance, no? I am also, bi-lingual. I can speak Spanish, northern english, southern english and a little ghetto. the video is full of ignorance, yes wasnt aware communication involved lowering oneself to the least common denominator though makes perfect sense Im guessing when we speak about the english, I should expect to see proper grammar and english to reflect that topic too? |
|
|
|
I've been told, when I am expecting others to do it my way, to expect in one hand and chit in the other. Get back to us the results of which one fills up first.
|
|
|
|
just making a point
I expect absolutely nothing but what I have seen over and over again,,,when someone shows me who they are,, I believe them,,, |
|
|
|
just making a point I expect absolutely nothing but what I have seen over and over again,,,when someone shows me who they are,, I believe them,,, I agree. There are thousands of this type of video that show them aping the same behavior. What is the answer? What can be done to house-break and tame the type of animal in the video? Electric shock shut her up. But, for how long? The fat broad was backin'-da-fk up as fast as she was slingin' slurs and her (adult) wanna-be bad boi wouldn't get too close to security. He already seen wut zappin' kin do. |
|
|