I'm reading where schools are considering allowing qualified teachers pack guns in schools.
I see pros and cons here.
Pros;
Better chances keeping kids safe. Studenrs in Ghetto schools won't know who's armed and just might learn some respect.
Couple of cons;
If I had a male teenaged child, he'd be endowed with some of my genes. That could make him vunerable at getting on a female teachers last nerve. She be having some PMS and he makes a comment on her looking swelled up could get him shot. Same thing with a menalpausal gal. Ya' never know when they could blow.

So, IMO, it would be best to only allow gualified (real) male teachers be the protectors of the flocks.

What ya'll think?

Myself I think that is a bunch of bs... and raciest against females.... Since I'm female and have been through the menopause situation.... I have known guys that did not need to have a gun due to they were so high strung they would blow in a minute...and more likely to shoot someone then a woman...

Myself I think they should hire ex military that can still pass a back ground check with no mental issues due to war...Due to they have more training with guns.....

Considering that most mass killings are by men and not women I think this theory of only men is far from right....

I still think it should be two heavily armed police on each campus. This is not Israel where we need to arm the teachers.

Male Police officer armed should be at each school. Make that at least 2 officers assigned to each school. And, paid for by that State it is in. No teacher should have a gun in schools. Some teachers do not need to have a gun.lol

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/28/16215255-arizona-sheriff-orders-armed-posse-to-patrol-schools?lite Hey . . . something effective, with a long track record of working.

Armed guards work. Volunteers are free.


. . . wait for it . . . . wait for it . . .I predict an incoming herd of people who will claim the volunteers will cause more harm than help all the while never showing any data at all to support that concept.


No one balks at someone suggesting having armed guards watch over stacks of gold, or money . . . but children . . . "outrageous"!


. . . must love your gold and money more than your kids . . .

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/23/16101856-nra-chief-if-putting-armed-police-in-schools-is-crazy-then-call-me-crazy?lite
Good question . . .

most tachers suck about teaching so idk if they would even man up or women up when the time comes. i dont think a teacher would mentally able enough in all the schools in usa. i think would be best to have a "fake teacher" posted up somewhere as an undercover security or something cause im sure most teachers would be sketched out knowing there is a teacher in the school thats down to cap someone, maybe could effect the teaching and school knowing one of there own has to make the choice

so lets just maybe hire these soldiers comming back with no job or something.... ?

Mark Cuban commented after the NRA response to new gun legislation that the Mayans probably had the NRA response in mind when they predicted the end.

Man that is stupid on so many levels, ahhh the stupid it burns.

I guarantee Mark Cuban has armed guards . . . but your children . . . naaa they dont need no guards.

Hmmm . . . I wonder.

MsTxsgal3333.
It's actually a sexist statement and meant as sarcasm towards all the ridiculous threads and posts from the anti-gun group.
My last ex could out shoot me and her other ex who taught her to shoot.
Many women are better shots and have a protective instinct about them.

As all sane and right minded folks know. Banning guns will only prove to strengthen the criminal and make them bolder.

That's sexist.
Aren't women cops just as qualified to guard schools?

Pure BS at its fullest.

This should be treated as the socalled war on terror.