Topic: UN asks Israel for Nuclear Transparacy | |
---|---|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.”
According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency |
|
|
|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.” According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency Israel isn't a Signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty! Besides,Resolutions in a Case like that ain't worth the Paper they are printed on! Absolutely non-binding,especially with non-Signatories! |
|
|
|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.” According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency Israel isn't a Signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty! Besides,Resolutions in a Case like that ain't worth the Paper they are printed on! Absolutely non-binding,especially with non-Signatories! Why does Israel refuse to sign the non proliferation treaty? Iran has. |
|
|
|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.” According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency Israel isn't a Signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty! Besides,Resolutions in a Case like that ain't worth the Paper they are printed on! Absolutely non-binding,especially with non-Signatories! Why does Israel refuse to sign the non proliferation treaty? Iran has. All they are doing is wasting Money! It don't mean a Thing! Wasting your Taxmoney! Enjoy! |
|
|
|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.” According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency Israel isn't a Signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty! Besides,Resolutions in a Case like that ain't worth the Paper they are printed on! Absolutely non-binding,especially with non-Signatories! Why does Israel refuse to sign the non proliferation treaty? Iran has. Right! And look where that has gone. Iran is "proliferating". |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Wed 12/05/12 12:54 AM
|
|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.” According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency Israel isn't a Signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty! Besides,Resolutions in a Case like that ain't worth the Paper they are printed on! Absolutely non-binding,especially with non-Signatories! Why does Israel refuse to sign the non proliferation treaty? Iran has. Right! And look where that has gone. Iran is "proliferating". They have every interest to get attention away from them! It's so lame! |
|
|
|
If I was Israel I would do exactly what they are doing, except that I might have already nuked Iran by now.
|
|
|
|
If I was Israel I would do exactly what they are doing, except that I might have already nuked Iran by now. |
|
|
|
Well Well... Israel being more and more isolated on the world stage... Double black eyes in a single week. If they don't play by international rules... The EU will sanction the chit out of them. About time I say!
I have a feeling that book of Esther offered to Obama will be shredded twice and sent back as fire starter. F Israel! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.” According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency Israel isn't a Signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty! Besides,Resolutions in a Case like that ain't worth the Paper they are printed on! Absolutely non-binding,especially with non-Signatories! exactly -some people need to get the facts straight. As I have said before Israel knows that many do not have her best interests at heart. Perhaps she'll be a signatory when Islam stops calling for her annihilation as their own reason to exist. |
|
|
|
Well Well... Israel being more and more isolated on the world stage... Double black eyes in a single week. If they don't play by international rules... The EU will sanction the chit out of them. About time I say! I have a feeling that book of Esther offered to Obama will be shredded twice and sent back as fire starter. F Israel! I think Israel has to stand up to bullies and in doing so that does require being unpopular sometimes. I am not sure why Israel did not sign the treaty, but it probably has to do with the nature of the neighborhood she's in... but you make a good point. Israel is armed to the teeth and not afraid to use it. BECAUSE she has taken her plot of ground and developed something productive and useful their in the way of an economy culture and nation state. she has BUILT something to protect, and when left alone she is a non agressor. None of that can be said for her neighbors excepts perhaps for having in interesting cultural history. She is also the best ally we have in the region (tho not totally obedient and she has no obligation to be) |
|
|
|
Edited by
JOHNN111
on
Wed 12/05/12 07:42 AM
|
|
They either sign the document or be side by side with Rogue states such as Pakistan, India and North Korea! The wheels ARE in motion! I'm good with that |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Wed 12/05/12 07:57 AM
|
|
They either sign the document or be side by side with Rogue states such as Pakistan, India and North Korea! The wheels ARE in motion! I'm good with that The UNGA Resolution has no Legal Standing at al! It's a Piece of Garbage! Guess India and Pakistan,both Members of the UN enjoy you calling them Rogue-Nations! |
|
|
|
Edited by
JOHNN111
on
Wed 12/05/12 08:00 AM
|
|
Guess India and Pakistan,both Members of the UN enjoy you calling them Rogue-Nations!
I don't care what they think... We're trying to contain North Koreas long range Nuclear program BECAUSE of Pakistan. IAEA Nuclear Inspections is a must! Deal with it Roguers! |
|
|
|
|
|
Guess India and Pakistan,both Members of the UN enjoy you calling them Rogue-Nations!
I don't care what they think... We're trying to contain North Koreas long range Nuclear program BECAUSE of Pakistan. IAEA Nuclear Inspections is a must! Deal with it Roguers! do you think the chinese will allow inspections? or the US? |
|
|
|
Guess India and Pakistan,both Members of the UN enjoy you calling them Rogue-Nations!
I don't care what they think... We're trying to contain North Koreas long range Nuclear program BECAUSE of Pakistan. IAEA Nuclear Inspections is a must! Deal with it Roguers! |
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Wed 12/05/12 08:06 AM
|
|
Here is my point with regard to the latest UN initiative.
This is a nonsense initiative aimed solely at deriding Israel based on rampant antisemitism and anti-Israel provocation led by groups of states in the UN opposed to Israel's existence. Let the idiotic and pointless Israel bashing begin! Brought to you by the Israel-hating body that sponsored the infamous Durban conferences on Human Rights which ignored horrific human rights violations all over the world and instead spent all their time bashing Israel despite the fact that Israel has a better human rights record than most of those countries that attended the ridiculous conferences!! The Durban Review Conference is the official name of the 2009 United Nations World Conference Against Racism (WCAR), also known as Durban II. The conference ran from Monday 20 April to Friday 24 April 2009, and took place at the United Nations Office in Geneva, Switzerland.[1] The conference was called under the mandate of United Nations General Assembly resolution 61/149 (passed in 2006) with a mandate to review the implementation of the The Durban Declaration and Programme of Action from the 2001 World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance which took place in Durban, South Africa. The conference was boycotted by Australia, Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, and the United States. The Czech Republic discontinued its attendance on the first day, and twenty-three other European Union countries sent low-level delegations. The western countries had expressed concerns that the conference would be used to promote anti-Semitism and laws against blasphemy perceived as contrary to the principles of free speech,[2][3][4][5][6] and that the conference would not deal with discrimination against homosexuals.[7] European countries also criticized the meeting for focusing on the West and ignoring problems of racism and intolerance in the developing world. Controversy surrounded the attendance of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the conference due to his past statements on Israel and the Holocaust. On the first day of the conference, Ahmadinejad, the only head of state to attend, made a speech condemning Israel as "totally racist"[8] and accusing the West of using the Holocaust as a "pretext" for aggression against Palestinians.[9] The distributed English version of the speech referred to the Holocaust as an "ambiguous and dubious question". When Ahmadinejad began to speak about Israel, all the European Union delegates left the conference room, while a number of the remaining delegates applauded the Iranian President.[10] UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon expressed dismay at both the boycotts and the speech.[11] Durban III, a follow-up conference that took place on 22 September 2011 in New York, was boycotted by the ten aforementioned countries (including the Czech Republic), along with Austria, Bulgaria, France and the United Kingdom. The big address at this joke of a conference was given by Iran's president and Holocaust denier Ahmadinejad who got the following reaction: Reactions to speech United Nations UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon expressed dismay at the incident, describing the words chosen by President Ahmadinejad as being those that are used "to accuse, divide and even incite".[11] Ban stated that he had asked Ahmadinejad in advance not to focus on "divisiveness" in his address and that "It is deeply regrettable that my plea to look to the future of unity was not heeded by the Iranian president. This is the opposite of what this conference seeks to achieve. This makes it significantly more difficult to build constructive solutions to the very real problem of racism," Ban said in a statement following Ahmadinejad's speech."[56] High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay condemned Ahmadinejad but objected to the walkout, saying "I condemn the use of a UN forum for political grandstanding. I find this totally objectionable... The best riposte for this type of event is to reply and correct, not to withdraw and boycott the conference."[77] Pillay also described Ahmadinejad as "somebody who traditionally makes obnoxious statements."[79] Iran At a later press conference, Ahmadinejad criticized the countries which boycotted or walked out of the summit as "arrogant and selfish," and asked of the walkout, "Why is it that the so-called advocates of freedom of information fear hearing other people's opinions?"[87] Israel Speaking at a state ceremony marking Holocaust Remembrance Day, Israeli President Shimon Peres called Ahmadinejad's appearance at the conference "a deplorable disgrace,"[88] commenting on his speech "Nazism has been crushed, but anti-Semitism is still alive. The gas has evaporated, but the poison remains."[89] In a letter to parliamentary counterparts abroad, Speaker of the Knesset Reuven Rivlin wrote "This time, Hitler has a beard and speaks Persian," and compared the conference to the 1936 Berlin Olympics, calling on legislators to take action against the Iranian president and not to ignore his anti-Israel pronouncements and threats.[90] Czech Republic The Czech Republic's Foreign Ministry, which held the European Union's rotating presidency at the time, announced shortly after the speech that it was breaking off its attendance at the conference in protest. A statement issued by the ministry described as unacceptable Ahmadinejad's description of the Israeli government as racist, stating that Prague therefore did not wish to lend weight to his "anti-Israeli attacks" by remaining present at the conference.[91] Norway Foreign Minister of Norway Jonas Gahr Store, who addressed the conference after Ahmadinejad's statements, said "Norway will not accept that the odd man out hijacks the collective efforts of many,"[92] adding the statements "run counter to the very spirit of dignity of the conference."[91] European Union The presidency of the European Union said in a statement: "The European Union rejects in strongest terms views expressed by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad labelling Israel as (a) racist regime." France French officials described it as a "hate speech".[11] (from the Wiki on the Durban Review Conference) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durban_Review_Conference Now while the UN watches Iran illegally enrich to weapons grade and threaten to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, the extremely alert and conscientious UN does what? Demands Israel to have their 50 year old nuclear installations inspected - although Israel has never threatened anyone! You can bet this will be taken seriously. |
|
|
|
he UN passes a resolution, calling on the Zionist regime to quickly open its nuclear program to inspection and join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay.” According to AP, the 193-member UN General Assembly on Monday passed the resolution 174 to six with six abstentions, urging Tel Aviv to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to have access to its nuclear facilities. Only the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau voted against the resolution that reflects international concern about suspicious Zionist regime’s nuclear activities. Zionist regime, the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, is widely known to have between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. The Israeli regime rejects all the regulatory international nuclear agreements -- the NPT in particular -- and refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspections. http://english.irib.ir/news/iran-a-iaea/item/102805-un-asks-zionist-regime-for-nuclear-transparency What Twoofers! |
|
|