Why I Do Not Like The Obamas
By: Mychal Massie


The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn’t like the Obama’s? Specifically I was asked: “I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama’s? It seems personal not policy related. You even dissed their Christmas family pic.” The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation.

I’ve made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don’t like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don’t hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.

I don’t hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America . They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagans made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?

Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama’s have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry and they display an animus for civility.

I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able too be proud of America . I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites, because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.

I have a saying, that “the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide.” No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed. And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother’s death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family . He has lied about his father’s military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nauseum.

He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He has fought for abortion procedures and opposed rulings that protected women and children, that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel.



His wife treats being the First Lady, as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement – as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.

I don’t like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies . We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.

Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin, it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies . And I have open scorn for their playing the race.

It is my intention to do all within my ability to ensure their reign is one term. I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.

As I wrote in a syndicated column titled “Nero In The White House” – “Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood…Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president , but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies , intimidation and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement – while America ’s people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.” (WND.com; 8/8/11)

Oh, and as for it being personal, you tell me how you would feel if a senator from Illinois sent you a personally signed card, intended to intimidate you and your family . Because you had written a syndicated column titled “Darth Democrat” that was critical of him. (WND.com 11/16/04)

Very good read. Yes it's opinion but hits the nail on the head.
http://m.mychal-massie.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmychal-massie.com%2Fpremium%2Fwhy-i-do-not-like-the-obamas%2F#2942

its well written

he sounds like a real crab ( ya know, hating to see others like him rise beyond him so much that he has to tear them down,,,,)


another perspective, from someone who doesnt take Massie seriously,,,,


http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2012/massieobama.html

,,,everyone is entitled to their opinion

So you do the same by calling him a crab and posting a link that has nothing to do with the piece in the OP.

the piece cites an author,, my post gives more information about the credibility of the author

and yes, I do realize and appreciate my entitlement to an opinion,,,

LOL so you use a blog to give info of the credibility of an opinion piece.

yep, a gave another PERSPECTIVE about the authors bias,,,,

even prequalified it as such before posting the link,,,

So the senior editor at media matters isn't anyway biased in his opinions about others?
Instead of trying to discredit an author by using a far left leaning "reporter"
Try discussing what is written in the piece originally posted.

who said?

all these pieces have BIAS

that is why it helps to have more than one perspective/bias,, on a topic

Go ahead and have a perspective on THE TOPIC
using a far left "journalists" opinion of who wrote the piece has nothing to do with THE TOPIC.
I could google Terry Krepels name and come up with several links to discredit him.

TJN

Good job.

MH

The strawman arguments appear endless. The OP sets the rules for his topic, not you.

thats cool, the piece is mostly hogwash

that he CONDEMNS and hates the obamas and revers Reagan is telling given his alledged reasons to condemn obama

one by one

1. "They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous"

that is contemptable huh

but this

from Raegan

'She has 80 names, 30 addresses, 12 Social Security cards and is collecting veteran's benefits on four non-existing deceased husbands. And she is collecting Social Security on her cards. She's got Medicaid, getting food stamps, and she is collecting welfare under each of her names.'


perpetuating an alleged 'welfare queen' that has yet to be proven to have ever existed,, made people feel 'good about themself?

HOGWASH


2. I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able too be proud of America .


'code speak'

could this be 'code speak' too,,,?

"Reagan arrived in Philadelphia, Mississippi. Speaking at the Neshoba County Fair, just a few miles from the earthen dam where the bodies of the three civil rights activists had been buried in 1964, Reagan reassured an enthusiastic audience of 10,000 people that "I believe in states' rights."33 Reagan promised, if elected, to "restore to states and local governments the power that belongs to them."34 During the 1950s and '60s, "States' rights" had been the mantra of southern segregationists who insisted the federal government had no right to intervene to force them to stop discriminating against black people. And "the power that belongs to local governments" had been used in Neshoba County to protect the murderers of civil rights activists. "


but Raegan was much more in love with AMERICA (all americans?) huh?

HOGWASH

3. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother’s death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family . He has lied about his father’s military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nauseum.



lying bothers him, but he admires Raegan?,,,lol ,, see above


MORE HOGWASH

4. His wife treats being the First Lady, as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement – as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.


he hates them for 'showing off',, why? do they come to his house and personally boast to him,, or is the medias choice of coverage now somehow the personal choice of those they decide to give coverage too,, INCLUDING the first family?

HOGWASH




5. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.


seriously? who is 'our' people exactly
and how do they disrespect them? (like calling them chimpanzees for instance as the AUTHOR has repeatedly done to the CIC)

disregard for congressonal authority? really, Is that why this president has issued TWO vetoes in four years against congress while REAGAN Issued 78 in eight years? but he reveres Reegan and holds contempt for OBama

HOGWASH

6. As I wrote in a syndicated column titled “Nero In The White House” – “Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood…Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president , but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies , intimidation and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement – while America ’s people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.” (WND.com; 8/8/11)


yes, never in his life has he witnessed it because he hasnt been looking so hard as he has since 'the first person of color' was elected,,,,

but the rest of us have seen plenty of these same allegations of 'contemptable' behaviors in presidents before, including his Revered Raegan


,,,I really dont like writing such long pieces, but since asked to discuss what was written,,, there you have it,,,

I thought MINGLE Set the rules,, I will make a note of it though,,,thanx,,,

Nice try. Mingle sets the rules for debate. The OP sets the rules for what is debated by defining the topic. Going off topic is a violation of mingle rules.

interesting, I have read terms of use and searched the phrase 'off topic',, nothing there

I am sure its a subjective standard (What is 'on topic' , that is)

to me, the title was about a SPECIFIC person (why I dislike the obamas)and why they specifically disliked OBAMA

my post was likewise about that SPECIFIC person , so not off topic to the title of the thread

in any case, its resolved, since I went back over the rather lengthy posting full of not alot of facts, and gave more specific reasons as to why I call hogwash,,,,

Hijacking threads is agin da' rules.

IM sure the mods are on the job,,,,

I tend to respond to posts sometimes without regarding the whole THREAD,,,,

if they see an issue, I will correct it, meantime, back on topic

HOGWASH!!

Ok you point several parts of the piece and then come up with responses about the Reagan's and call it hogwash? It makes ABSOLUTLY no sense in regards to what you picked out. The things about the Reagans you put in had nothing to do with the post. Do you know if he agrees with the few things you posted about the Reagans?
Now all you're doing is discreaditing the Reagans in your own opinion.

I always find it funny when those who are in the bag for Obama will change the subject to try and defend Obama.
Instead of proving what was written wrong. Obama did a good job of teaching distraction tactics.
Look over there a squirrel.

the author holds the REAGANS up as a postive example

'President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagans made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish.'

yet everything he charges the OBamas with to support his feelings against them, can be equally applied/alleged against the Raegans whom he obviously regards with esteem


see the hypocrisy/double standard/relevance now?

No I don't.
He used one example in one part about Reagans as an example.

"I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagans made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?

Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama’s have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry and they display an animus for civility. "
In your responses you are taking what he said out of context.
It's not about the Reagans.
It's about Obama.
Show where he's wrong about what he writes about his reasons.
Not your reasoning to try and discredit the author.

I addressed his 'reasons', the alleged reasons that are supposedly supporting his condemnation of one person dont apparently stop him from REVERING another

it is difficult to prove opinions 'right' or 'wrong'

but its easier to point out hypocrisy and inconsistency in those opinions,,,