So if cell phones work fine in Australian aircraft,then why do the airlines request passengers not to use them?

yea, we can send a drone after you.

Because there is a school of thought that believes they may interfere with communications and navigational equipment. It is much the same as warnings posted in hospitals, but such warnings are often ignored.

I feel like you already have.

If I simplified it, it is because the details only confuse you and you go off on some tangent.

So I HAVE to grossly over simplify my point.

As I have said before, what I have presented here is a mere tiny drop in the bucket of evidence and wrong doing where the 9/11 Commission is concerned and why I don't believe them.

But these small and simple points are not being understood or even taken seriously.

I am not making this stuff up.

You gloss over the details as if they mean nothing. In Investigating a crime of this magnitude, glossing over clues, omitting testimony and that sort of thing is gross negligence.

I could go into more detail but I see how useless it all is because you stand ready to dismiss everything and every point I make.

You have decided that you will never listen to anything I say so there is no point in saying it.

Good night.

A school of thought... I see.

In otherwords.... they don't "work fine."

So then if cell phones interfere with communications and navigational equipment, then that could be why flight UA 93 crashed.

Please stop making up lies. It convinces no-one.

I stated: ... there is a school of thought that believes they may interfere with communications and navigational equipment.

And you make it into: So then if cell phones interfere with communications and navigational equipment


This is the problem with most of your hypotheses and you seem unable to grasp this obvious flaw.

Ok, so I'm making up stories about receiving calls over New Zealand and on Flights from Sydney? You're are grasping at straws here and only making yourself look silly.

I think you should worry about making yourself look silly.

If they "work fine" then the airlines should not be telling people to shut off the phones as if it were a matter of life and death.

If you are not supposed to use them in airplanes and you are doing it anyway, and the school of thought is that they might interfere with communications and navigational equipment, then you are endangering the plane and passengers because you refuse to believe them, and you don't do as you are told.

The bottom line is you believe that on 9-11 people could have made cell phone calls from the hijacked planes.

I don't believe the cell phone calls in question were real.

That's the bottom line.

Try reading and comprehending. Note I said I received calls from people on aircraft.

But you have no evidence to support this, apart from your own suspicions based upon a preconceived hypothesis.

Let me try this again. I received calls from people on aircraft. I was on the ground. Do you understand this?

That is untrue. I explore a hypothesis based on the evidence and evaluate the hypothesis based on the said evidence. Standard Operational Procedure. This is how academics work. As a rule, they aren't driven by preconceived notions based on prejudice and bias.