100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd. of course it would be "absurd" to someone who can't/won't understand it... and they didn't fall straight down...close, but not straight... what is your theory on how/why they fell? just curious... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Mon 04/16/12 05:33 AM
|
|
the biggest thing in my mind is there is a strong possibility that cheney could have known about it, but did nothing to stop it... ... I agree with you. That poses a serious Question to the defenders of the official report. A vice President of America more than likely allowed 3000 Americans citizens to be murdered and there are people on here defending that without question and attack those that question. 
I bet you 2.3 Trillion Dollars that something smells about 911 
What is next? Tesla-Weapons that required about three times the total Output in electrical Power than the world could even generate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saying "the truthers" is way too vague. There are many ridiculous ideas about what happened on 9-11 and to bundle them all up together and tag them with pet like "truthers" name is just idiotic and dumb. It is propaganda at its finest though. However it is not good investigation. it is what it is, and your right, there are way to many ridiculous ideas about what happened on 9-11... the biggest thing in my mind is there is a strong possibility they cheney could have known about it, but did nothing to stop it... but to say him and bush manufactured all of this is just stupid, IMO... Well I don't think Bush or Cheney were smart enough to manufacture it themselves.
But I do think they were cogs in the wheel. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Mon 04/16/12 05:34 AM
|
|
the biggest thing in my mind is there is a strong possibility that cheney could have known about it, but did nothing to stop it... ... I agree with you. That poses a serious Question to the defenders of the official report. A vice President of America more than likely allowed 3000 Americans citizens to be murdered and there are people on here defending that without question and attack those that question.
I bet you 2.3 Trillion Dollars that something smells about 911
What is next? Tesla-Weapons that required about three times the total Output in electrical Power that the world could even generate? Lets cut the ****shite Do you Conrad accept the Official Report 100% Yes or No will suffice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Mon 04/16/12 05:38 AM
|
|
the biggest thing in my mind is there is a strong possibility that cheney could have known about it, but did nothing to stop it... ... I agree with you. That poses a serious Question to the defenders of the official report. A vice President of America more than likely allowed 3000 Americans citizens to be murdered and there are people on here defending that without question and attack those that question.
I bet you 2.3 Trillion Dollars that something smells about 911
What is next? Tesla-Weapons that required about three times the total Output in electrical Power that the world could even generate? Lets cut the ******** Do you Conrad accept the Official Report 100% Yes or No will suffice How may times have I told you that I do not answer Loaded Questions? Actually I am refuting the Guff of the Truthers,not looking what might be lacking in the Official version! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said
"If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". you know that is a false statement too... trying to get people to your way of thinking by giving an either/or situation is bogus... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". you know that is a false statement too... trying to get people to your way of thinking by giving an either/or situation is bogus... I already know that you have serious doubts about the Official Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". you know that is a false statement too... trying to get people to your way of thinking by giving an either/or situation is bogus... I already know that you have serious doubts about the Official Report i don't trust much of anything the government says, but that doesn't mean i think they had grand conspiracy on this... the government is the worse type of liar, mixing truth with lies. i believe that there are much worse conspiracies out there, like JFK and the Waco incident... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Mon 04/16/12 05:54 AM
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". you know that is a false statement too... trying to get people to your way of thinking by giving an either/or situation is bogus... I already know that you have serious doubts about the Official Report i don't trust much of anything the government says, but that doesn't mean i think they had grand conspiracy on this... the government is the worse type of liar, mixing truth with lies. i believe that there are much worse conspiracies out there, like JFK and the Waco incident... You and I are now on the same hymn sheet  
Now for the die-hard yes-men
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". That is classic internet troll logic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". That is classic internet troll logic. Good Morning Metalwing Do you metalwing agree 100% with the official 911 report A simple Yes or No will suffice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Jeanniebean said "If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously". That is classic internet troll logic. Good Morning Metalwing Do you metalwing agree 100% with the official 911 report A simple Yes or No will suffice I see you are entering the classic troll model of thinking. The logic goes something like this "If I can get someone to accept that ANY part of a series of events that I postulate as proof of my position, I win. In the real world, real people with real knowledge show people where real confirmation of real facts and knowledge exist. Like when I, at your request, sent you to the ASCE Structural website. Instead of coming back with verification of the veracity of the information and, maybe, learning a little about the topic, the troll ignores the factual source and continues along the line you are taking. So, I will ask again, what did you learn from the ASCE Structural site? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you cannot do a simple Yes or No that's fine with me.
It's not about winning..at least not with me it isn't. This is about truth, nothing more nothing less. I do not accept the official report as 100% True Next please
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you cannot do a simple Yes or No that's fine with me. It's not about winning..at least not with me it isn't. This is about truth, nothing more nothing less. I do not accept the official report as 100% True Next please
Yes, this is about the truth. Since you cannot describe a single thing you learned from the ASCE website, are you saying you are just another internet troll or that the information there in abundance is beyond your ability to understand? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd. of course it would be "absurd" to someone who can't/won't understand it... and they didn't fall straight down...close, but not straight... what is your theory on how/why they fell? just curious... No evidence suggests controlled demolition.. i have to agree, i have not seen any evidence of it... none what so ever... By evidence I believe they are referring to their lack of understanding in physics, material science, and structural engineering. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd. of course it would be "absurd" to someone who can't/won't understand it... and they didn't fall straight down...close, but not straight... what is your theory on how/why they fell? just curious... No evidence suggests controlled demolition.. i have to agree, i have not seen any evidence of it... none what so ever... By evidence I believe they are referring to their lack of understanding in physics, material science, and structural engineering. Good Morning Chazster Do you Chazster agree 100% with the 911 Official Report Yes or No will suffice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I never read the full report so I cant answer it. Thus i argue on what I know only.
|
|
|
|
|
