100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: winer | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sun 02/05/12 05:42 AM
|
|
Pakistan dosnt support aliban its just a perception and allegation....and its universal truth that LOSER ALWAY MAKE PRETENCE....LOL 
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB227/index.htm Pakistan: "The Taliban's Godfather"? Documents Detail Years of Pakistani Support for Taliban, Extremists Covert Policy Linked Taliban, Kashmiri Militants, Pakistan's Pashtun Troops Aid Encouraged Pro-Taliban Sympathies in Troubled Border Region and that's just the Tip of the Iceberg! But now they have started to turn around and are biting the Hand that feeds them! Besides,harboring the Top-Command of the Taliban and alQueda isn't Aiding and Abetting? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pakistan dosnt support aliban its just a perception and allegation....and its universal truth that LOSER ALWAY MAKE PRETENCE....LOL
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB227/index.htm and that's just the Tip of the Iceberg! But now they have started to turn around and are biting the Hand that feeds them! Besides,harboring the Top-Command of the Taliban and alQueda isn't Aiding and Abetting? And still they deny.... Morning/afternoon Con!!... 
I just read National Archive yesterday...Thought about posting and didn't...good stuff...just read it, twice!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pakistan dosnt support aliban its just a perception and allegation....and its universal truth that LOSER ALWAY MAKE PRETENCE....LOL
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB227/index.htm and that's just the Tip of the Iceberg! But now they have started to turn around and are biting the Hand that feeds them! Besides,harboring the Top-Command of the Taliban and alQueda isn't Aiding and Abetting? And still they deny.... Morning/afternoon Con!!...
I just read National Archive yesterday...Thought about posting and didn't...good stuff...just read it, twice!!!
Musharaf even had to concede that it took place and still is! They are still shielding the Taliban Top-Brass! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pakistan dosnt support aliban its just a perception and allegation....and its universal truth that LOSER ALWAY MAKE PRETENCE....LOL
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB227/index.htm and that's just the Tip of the Iceberg! But now they have started to turn around and are biting the Hand that feeds them! Besides,harboring the Top-Command of the Taliban and alQueda isn't Aiding and Abetting? And still they deny.... Morning/afternoon Con!!...
I just read National Archive yesterday...Thought about posting and didn't...good stuff...just read it, twice!!!
Musharaf even had to concede that it took place and still is! They are still shielding the Taliban Top-Brass!  And this is just the stuff we DO know.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was wondering when the-Con wud show up :).he always does,any time anybody shows doubt in the official version of things :) difficult to doubt rubble and death when it lays at your feet - the message is don't do it that simple our boys have no desire to be away from home so don't do it again simple |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
khan327
on
Sun 02/05/12 08:52 AM
|
|
Yes pak support taliban but in the past not yet..u say pak support terrorist in kashmir ok..in kashmir more then 3 lakh ppl killed by indian army more then 1 lakh women become widow children become orphan its not terrorism:|if dozen kashmiri youths fight for ther freedom its terrorism:oask from obama to solve kashmir problem according to united nation resolution.....who is the founder of taliban and alqaeda CIA.. who bring arab to kabul CIA..when usa were using taliban aganist rusia in those day they were not terrorist but now they are terroris what is it and now you are going to los the war pak responsible for it .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes pak support taliban but in the past not yet..u say pak support terrorist in kashmir ok..in kashmir more then 3 lakh ppl killed by indian army more then 1 lakh women become widow children become orphan its not terrorism:|if dozen kashmiri youths fight for ther freedom its terrorism:oask from obama to solve kashmir problem according to united nation resolution.....who is the founder of taliban and alqaeda CIA.. who bring arab to kabul CIA..when usa were using taliban aganist rusia in those day they were not terrorist but now they are terroris what is it and now you are going to los the war pak responsible for it ....... Can I ask you what "lakh" means? I am trying to understand your post. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sun 02/05/12 10:23 AM
|
|
Yes pak support taliban but in the past not yet..u say pak support terrorist in kashmir ok..in kashmir more then 3 lakh ppl killed by indian army more then 1 lakh women become widow children become orphan its not terrorism:|if dozen kashmiri youths fight for ther freedom its terrorism:oask from obama to solve kashmir problem according to united nation resolution.....who is the founder of taliban and alqaeda CIA.. who bring arab to kabul CIA..when usa were using taliban aganist rusia in those day they were not terrorist but now they are terroris what is it and now you are going to los the war pak responsible for it ....... Can I ask you what "lakh" means? I am trying to understand your post. I believe it means, 100,000. I kinda' understand what he's saying. Maybe, when Russia invaded Afghanistan, the Taliban were supported by the US. Now, the US calls them terrorists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes pak support taliban but in the past not yet..u say pak support terrorist in kashmir ok..in kashmir more then 3 lakh ppl killed by indian army more then 1 lakh women become widow children become orphan its not terrorism:|if dozen kashmiri youths fight for ther freedom its terrorism:oask from obama to solve kashmir problem according to united nation resolution.....who is the founder of taliban and alqaeda CIA.. who bring arab to kabul CIA..when usa were using taliban aganist rusia in those day they were not terrorist but now they are terroris what is it and now you are going to los the war pak responsible for it ....... Can I ask you what "lakh" means? I am trying to understand your post. Okay thanks Willing I looked it up was trying to find the translation.....Anyways, honestly I don't believe the US should be involved in the wars and affairs of others.....It truly saddens me the loss of like in wars, as well as, famine and families torn asunder....I believe RP is correct we need to bring our military home and stop meddling in others affairs......Let them fight amongst themselves and hash it out without support from the US.....Its time the US minds its own business..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes pak support taliban but in the past not yet..u say pak support terrorist in kashmir ok..in kashmir more then 3 lakh ppl killed by indian army more then 1 lakh women become widow children become orphan its not terrorism:|if dozen kashmiri youths fight for ther freedom its terrorism:oask from obama to solve kashmir problem according to united nation resolution.....who is the founder of taliban and alqaeda CIA.. who bring arab to kabul CIA..when usa were using taliban aganist rusia in those day they were not terrorist but now they are terroris what is it and now you are going to los the war pak responsible for it ....... Can I ask you what "lakh" means? I am trying to understand your post. Okay thanks Willing I looked it up was trying to find the translation.....Anyways, honestly I don't believe the US should be involved in the wars and affairs of others.....It truly saddens me the loss of like in wars, as well as, famine and families torn asunder....I believe RP is correct we need to bring our military home and stop meddling in others affairs......Let them fight amongst themselves and hash it out without support from the US.....Its time the US minds its own business..... Over in east Asia, they been warrin' each other since before Christ was a shingle weaver. You right. We have no business, except oil business, there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syria next......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syria next...... You reckon Barry will go against the nay votes of Russia and China? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syria next...... You reckon Barry will go against the nay votes of Russia and China? Everything Possible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
smart2009
on
Sun 02/05/12 11:00 AM
|
|
Syria next...... You reckon Barry will go against the nay votes of Russia and China? H. Clinton wants war with Syria.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U dont believe that US start the war.....then who start the war an afgan and iraq?????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U dont believe that US start the war.....then who start the war an afgan and iraq????? Taliban and alQueda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U dont believe that US start the war.....then who start the war an afgan and iraq????? There has been war in those regions for centuries.....the US shouldn't help India, Israel, or anyone or support any war from any faction. No, I don't believe the US started it......I do believe however, than many allies wanted it......I don't believe the US military should be anywhere but in the US. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U dont believe that US start the war.....then who start the war an afgan and iraq????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U dont believe that US start the war.....then who start the war an afgan and iraq?????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes pak support taliban but in the past not yet..u say pak support terrorist in kashmir ok..in kashmir more then 3 lakh ppl killed by indian army more then 1 lakh women become widow children become orphan its not terrorism:|if dozen kashmiri youths fight for ther freedom its terrorism:oask from obama to solve kashmir problem according to united nation resolution.....who is the founder of taliban and alqaeda CIA.. who bring arab to kabul CIA..when usa were using taliban aganist rusia in those day they were not terrorist but now they are terroris what is it and now you are going to los the war pak responsible for it ....... Can I ask you what "lakh" means? I am trying to understand your post. I believe it means, 100,000. I kinda' understand what he's saying. Maybe, when Russia invaded Afghanistan, the Taliban were supported by the US. Now, the US calls them terrorists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban |
|
|
|
|
