100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: The Problem With Evolution? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
No, I didn't. Jeez. POSTED BY Sin and Sorrow
God needs them to walk; yes. you always claim that God didn't have needs ....my aim was to make you say that he did have needs ....not that I've done that....it's time for me to move on BECAUSE WALKING REQUIRES LEGS. You are only hearing what you want. It's sad. Truly. Answer this. What can 'walk' without legs? God WANTED to walk. Walking NEEDS legs. Again you are doing it again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, I didn't. Jeez. POSTED BY Sin and Sorrow
God needs them to walk; yes. you always claim that God didn't have needs ....my aim was to make you say that he did have needs ....not that I've done that....it's time for me to move on BECAUSE WALKING REQUIRES LEGS. You are only hearing what you want. It's sad. Truly. Answer this. What can 'walk' without legs? God WANTED to walk. Walking NEEDS legs. Again you are doing it again. Exactly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Cowboy understands it.
I'm sure you must. Of course, that's also probably why you are now silent. When debating God, no matter what the aspect of it, you cannot humanize Him because he isn't human. Just because other living things may or may not have evolved from something, it doesn't mean that God did, merely because not everything evolves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy doesn't even understand even the very simple
basics of the bible.....he doesn't even undersrtand that God is ONE SUPREME BEING (One Entity). Yet he continues to preach his false gosepel on here... 
Funches finally wisened up and moved on.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy doesn't even understand even the very simple basics of the bible.....he doesn't even undersrtand that God is ONE SUPREME BEING (One Entity). Yet he continues to preach his false gosepel on here...
Funches finally wisened up and moved on.... ...started off fine, but you ended on a horrid note. 'Wisened up'? Ha! ..yet, at the same time.. Who are you to say his belief is wrong? (Not that I know what you are actually speaking of.) Just because you believe one way; doesn't make his interpretation wrong. Granted, Cowboy confuses me a lot with his explanations and what not; still, he is entitled to his won version, own set of beliefs. In fact, that's what Christianity is all about. Perception. However, perception is irrelevant when you are, in fact, praying to the same entity. Whether one, three, or a thousand like the ancient Romans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy doesn't even understand even the very simple basics of the bible.....he doesn't even undersrtand that God is ONE SUPREME BEING (One Entity). Yet he continues to preach his false gosepel on here...
Funches finally wisened up and moved on.... no I meant moved on about God having needs ....I had to push them into a conversation in which they had no choice but to admit that God has needs that's the only way to teach and enlighten |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy doesn't even understand even the very simple basics of the bible.....he doesn't even undersrtand that God is ONE SUPREME BEING (One Entity). Yet he continues to preach his false gosepel on here...
Funches finally wisened up and moved on.... when Cowboy says something...simply ask him which denomination of Christianity follow what he is talking about .....the only one he will be able to name are the ones that follow "Cowboy-anity" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy doesn't even understand even the very simple basics of the bible.....he doesn't even undersrtand that God is ONE SUPREME BEING (One Entity). Yet he continues to preach his false gosepel on here...
Funches finally wisened up and moved on.... They are one God, this much is true. But they could not possibly be one "entity". The scriptures would not make specific statements on what the specific "entity" has said or done. If they were the same entity, they would use the same title for each and every one of them. Would just say for instance "God did this, God did that, God said this, God said that" ect. Would not say the LORD God did this, the LORD God did that. There would be no "Father" no "Son" if they were one entity. The father could not have said "This is my son in whom I'm well pleased" if they were one entity. For the father would be speaking of himself in third person and would be in fact a lie. For someone can not be the father of themselves or the child of themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy doesn't even understand even the very simple basics of the bible.....he doesn't even undersrtand that God is ONE SUPREME BEING (One Entity). Yet he continues to preach his false gosepel on here...
Funches finally wisened up and moved on.... no I meant moved on about God having needs ....I had to push them into a conversation in which they had no choice but to admit that God has needs that's the only way to teach and enlighten God has no needs. God doesn't even need us. He created us cause he wants us, not because he needed to. God does what he does not because he has to but because he loves us and wants to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy doesn't even understand even the very simple basics of the bible.....he doesn't even undersrtand that God is ONE SUPREME BEING (One Entity). Yet he continues to preach his false gosepel on here...
Funches finally wisened up and moved on.... when Cowboy says something...simply ask him which denomination of Christianity follow what he is talking about .....the only one he will be able to name are the ones that follow "Cowboy-anity" Call it what you wish. I spread what the scriptures teach/say, not what "Christianity" teaches or any other title you wish to give it. I have been in fault, not saying I'm perfect and know it 100% absolute compact. But all I ask is if I am incorrect to be shown the correct. And to give absolute on me being incorrect, not just because one thinks me to be in the wrong. Then when that is done we can further investigate it and find out which one is truly in the error. That's all I've asked for this entire time. But when I "see it differently" people see that as arguing and just shut up, then it's left at that. Neither one has been shown their error and nothing is gained. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's the only way to teach and enlighten ...so when is this going to happen then? Cause you've yet to do that. Teach or enlighten that is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's the only way to teach and enlighten ...so when is this going to happen then? Cause you've yet to do that. Teach or enlighten that is. POSTED BY Sin and Sorrow
God needs them to walk; yes. all I had to do is to get you to admit that God has "needs' ...I've done that .....and you have been enlighten |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's the only way to teach and enlighten ...so when is this going to happen then? Cause you've yet to do that. Teach or enlighten that is. POSTED BY Sin and Sorrow
God needs them to walk; yes. all I had to do is to get you to admit that God has "needs' ...I've done that .....and you have been enlighten But God doesn't need to walk, therefore he has no need for the legs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's the only way to teach and enlighten ...so when is this going to happen then? Cause you've yet to do that. Teach or enlighten that is. POSTED BY Sin and Sorrow
God needs them to walk; yes. all I had to do is to get you to admit that God has "needs' ...I've done that .....and you have been enlighten No, I didn't. No, I haven't. That doesn't state he needed legs. That states he would need them to walk. Walking requires legs. Not God. So, you've been enlighten, for the 60th time. Again, you refuse to accept it. I've schooled you so much. I should charge. Last free lesson, I swear. Want more details for this? Scroll up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But God doesn't need to walk, therefore he has no need for the legs. THANK YOU! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's the only way to teach and enlighten ...so when is this going to happen then? Cause you've yet to do that. Teach or enlighten that is. POSTED BY Sin and Sorrow
God needs them to walk; yes. all I had to do is to get you to admit that God has "needs' ...I've done that .....and you have been enlighten But God doesn't need to walk, therefore he has no need for the legs. according to the bible he does... according to Cowboy-anity he don't |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sin_and_Sorrow
on
Thu 02/09/12 02:25 PM
|
|
that's the only way to teach and enlighten ...so when is this going to happen then? Cause you've yet to do that. Teach or enlighten that is. POSTED BY Sin and Sorrow
God needs them to walk; yes. all I had to do is to get you to admit that God has "needs' ...I've done that .....and you have been enlighten But God doesn't need to walk, therefore he has no need for the legs. according to the bible he does... according to Cowboy-anity he don't No, according to physics. Bible doesn't say he NEEDED to walk or else he would have died; now does it? No. Therefore, he wanted to. Better yet. Read to me exactly what and where you are getting this 'need' from in the Bible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
funches
on
Thu 02/09/12 02:25 PM
|
|
But God doesn't need to walk, therefore he has no need for the legs. THANK YOU! no thank me...for enlightening you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But God doesn't need to walk, therefore he has no need for the legs. THANK YOU! no thank me...for enlightening you ..but you haven't. Seriously. You've done no such thing. False praising of self.. ..sounds to me like another Bible may be in the workings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH,
for the first time I meet a person who lies himself and abuse the religion as badly as no one of the enemy of it do or done it you CowboyGH not only have shown us your arrogant way of abusing religion but you are doing the same to all of the forumers by trying to underrate their intelligence you CowboyGH you have no idea what are you doing and/or talking about and you show that you are not knowledgeable about the bible or your faith but only with internet copy and paste quotes and non of them at the right time or place CowboyGH , waiting for your apologize abt what you lie here : ====================================================== Shows Jesus' father is his God. But that does not mean there are two Gods. Shows that Jesus is our God. ====================================================== But hey CowboyGH , I wont cry and care if you don't do it ... Guess why .... So CowboyGH .... by your words above what is true ? 1. there is one god or many gods ? 2. if God is the only creator then who created 'on a lower level then world wide, there are many gods ' ? 3. If God is 'ONE supreme being' then Jesus is that 'ONE supreme being' ? Luke 4:12 12And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God Shows that Jesus is our God. -------- Matthew 27:45-46 45Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour. 46And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Shows Jesus' father is his God. But that does not mean there are two Gods. Again "God" is purely for showing authority over another, it is not some mystical, magical, fantasy. That is why Jesus is our God, for he is our lord, he is the one that will judge us, he is the one that created us, he is the one in charge of us. Jesus referred to his father as "God" because his father is the authority over him. So with the Father have authority over the son and or the father being the God of the son, that would mean the father is our God as well. We get to the father through Jesus Christ. We worship the father through Jesus Christ. We worship one God, one authority. They may be two different "persons" but they are one God, they are one authority over us. EG., "The father and I are one". |
|
|
|
|
