if you have read ANY of my postings over the years, you would know I absolutely dont agree with the 'by association' mindset....

you have either done it or you havent, I Dont believe people should be accountable for what someone else did,,,

Yet.......with other things you have no problems with it. Make up your mind, can't have it both ways.

And either way, you put yourself in a dangerous situation, you own the consequences.

Sounds to me like the accomplice had plenty of time to say "WTF?" and leave....which he apparently did not until after the shooting.

TEEN MOM CALLS 9-1-1 FOR PERMISSION TO SHOOT INTRUDERS BEFORE KILLING ONE USING 12-GAUGE SHOTGUN


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/mom-calls-9-1-1-asking-for-permission-to-shoot-intruders-before-killing-one-using-12-ga-shotgun/


Eighteen-year-old Sarah McKinley and her 3-month-old son were unharmed when two intruders tried to break into their home outside of Oklahoma City on New Year’s Eve. Her husband had died from lung cancer on Christmas Day, and when she realized intruders were attempting to break into her home she had nothing to do but grab her 12-gauge shotgun and pistol, and call 911.

She spoke with the operator for 21 minutes, making sure she had the right to shoot if the men forced their way in.

“I can’t tell you that you can do that, but you do what you have to do to protect your baby,” the dispatcher told her as she held the infant with a bottle, according to KOCO.

She ultimately pulled the trigger.


One of the men, 24-year-old Justin Martin, McKinley is believed to have been stalking her since her husband’s death. ABC news reports that McKinley barricaded herself in her bedroom with the baby and guns. When Martin kicked down the bedroom door, McKinley’s maternal instincts kicked in:

“When Martin kicked in the door and came after her with the knife, the teen mom shot and killed the 24-year-old. Police are calling the shooting justified.

‘You’re allowed to shoot an unauthorized person that is in your home. The law provides you the remedy, and sanctions the use of deadly force; Det. Dan Huff of the Blanchard police said.”

Martin died and the second suspect, Dustin Stewart, currently sits in jail. Investigators are searching Martin’s car for evidence that the home invasion was premeditated, KFOR-TV reported.

“I wouldn’t have done it, but it was my son,” McKinley told KOCO. “It’s not an easy decision to make, but it was either going to be him or my son. And it wasn’t going to be my son. There’s nothing more dangerous than a woman with a child.”
Amen.

in what other things do I support 'guilt by association'?


I agree, you own consequences to YOURSELF when you are in a dangerous situation,,,not what happens to SOMEONE with you because of THEIR choices,,

Hmm let's see.......original sin.......supporting the idea that because of what ONE person does to others, everyone else has to sacrifice some of their rights because of it........need I go on?

They were BOTH looking for the same thing, no sympathy from me.

Adults have choices...he made his....the wrong one!

I dont know what they 'both' were looking for. The article mentioned only of ONE having a weapon or breaking in a door.


what was the responsibility and consequence of the first TWO, is another story from what our responsibilities are as a world full of people

Twist it how you want but the idea remains the same.

That's what courts used to be for....before the NDAA our fearless leader signed as a new years gift to us!

He can now be called a terrorist!

not really, the same idea would be if the tree was cursed for being there when original sin took place


there is a real consquence that befalls our children because of OUR choices, the first two parents passed on the consequence of their action

Don't doubt it...enough bleeding hearts appeal to the right source....instant terrorist!

That's what the NDAA is!

They need an example set..... perfect agenda!

NDAA does not replace or supercede US LAW which defines terrorism as

(From U.S. Code Title 22, Ch.38, Para. 2656f(d)

(d) Definitions
As used in this section—
(1) the term “international terrorism” means terrorism involving citizens or the territory of more than 1 country;
(2) the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;
(3) the term “terrorist group” means any group, or which has significant subgroups which practice, international terrorism


unless they can stretch a stalker/assault situation into a 'politically motivated violence'

I doubt anyone will be considered a terrorist in this situaiton

(2) the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;