Topic: Looney Ron Paul Cant Answer Question | |
---|---|
Paul should be excused for his inability to answer important questions. There are many real-world questions that religions like libertarianism simply have no answer for. Not to mention he starts to stutter when he gets frusterated and the other candidates show people who he really is. |
|
|
|
I think Cain would be an awesome President.
You thought MIchelle Bachman was "awesome". |
|
|
|
But there is not one story about him on their website...strange. I guess he doesn't fit their agenda. Actually the only reason I went to FOX was the link you posted........I rarely go there. News is too biased. What would we do for information without the internet? I disagree. There is news about Ron Paul all over the place. ITs not on LOCAL news in most places that dont have a relation to Ron Paul though. But it IS on news like Fox, CBS, ABC, USA, as well as written media like the Post, the Times, Wall STreet Journal, Chicago Tribune go to a search engine that searches news sources, there are about 10000 entries,,, of course you disagree, your watching through rose colored glasses |
|
|
|
Libertarianism believes that everyone should be a big girl or boy and solve their own problems.....that is the solution to solve your own problems....what a novelty...ehhh? A real-world answer to the real-world questions.
Somalia is a Libertarian paradise. Everybody there is a big boy and girl and has absolute, complete freedom to solve their own problems. No thanks. |
|
|
|
Paul should be excused for his inability to answer important questions. There are many real-world questions that religions like libertarianism simply have no answer for. and what are those questions? still not going to answer this? make a silly statement then just ignore the answer? |
|
|
|
Libertarianism believes that everyone should be a big girl or boy and solve their own problems.....that is the solution to solve your own problems....what a novelty...ehhh? A real-world answer to the real-world questions.
Somalia is a Libertarian paradise. Everybody there is a big boy and girl and has absolute, complete freedom to solve their own problems. No thanks. I understand some people arent capable of handling the freedoms the United States were built on, or arent capable of being a big boy or girl.....therefore they are only to happy to be controlled by the governement of which they ***** about....hey more power to them....but then again their say goes out the window too..... |
|
|
|
Libertarianism believes that everyone should be a big girl or boy and solve their own problems.....that is the solution to solve your own problems....what a novelty...ehhh? A real-world answer to the real-world questions.
Somalia is a Libertarian paradise. Everybody there is a big boy and girl and has absolute, complete freedom to solve their own problems. No thanks. I understand some people arent capable of handling the freedoms the United States were built on, or arent capable of being a big boy or girl.....therefore they are only to happy to be controlled by the governement of which they ***** about....hey more power to them....but then again their say goes out the window too..... democrats live for controlling other people, he's just following his nature... having someone do their own problems doesn't register with dems, they need to control everything. |
|
|
|
and what are those questions? Cmon Moe. I'm back online for 30 seconds and you're badgering me to pay attention to your question first? Kinda rude, doncha think?
What questions? Well, Whos's gong to build your roads? Who's going to teach the children of people who have no money? Who's going to see to clean air, clean water, safe energy, safe food? How do we prevent monopolies so that we have choices in the marketplace? How do we keep the Koch Brothers from running the world? How do we ensure choice in our election systems? How do we prevent America from becoming like Somalia? How do we ensure that there will be a middle class? How do we prevent the Corporatocracy from cornering the market on things like air and water, or do we want to? Are we to have our entire transportation system consist of privatized toll roads? Should our National Parks become private Disneylands? How many plane crashes do we need before we decide that we need an FAA? Is it OK to have a two-tiered class system? A rich elite and a working poor? Is it OK to have a police state to keep people who don't like this kind of a world in line? Should every news medium become a propaganda machine exclusively for the ruling bureaucracy? How shall we ensure that the Supreme Court does not become completely owned by the Koch Brothers? How many of these questions do you want me to come up with? Perhaps you could attempt some answers on your own. |
|
|
|
But there is not one story about him on their website...strange. I guess he doesn't fit their agenda. Actually the only reason I went to FOX was the link you posted........I rarely go there. News is too biased. What would we do for information without the internet? I disagree. There is news about Ron Paul all over the place. ITs not on LOCAL news in most places that dont have a relation to Ron Paul though. But it IS on news like Fox, CBS, ABC, USA, as well as written media like the Post, the Times, Wall STreet Journal, Chicago Tribune go to a search engine that searches news sources, there are about 10000 entries,,, of course you disagree, your watching through rose colored glasses Well, its a personal perception. Just like some dont agree with me when I perceive this president to be more highly scrutinized than others. I dont agree that Ron Paul has any more or less media attention than any other in his political status. |
|
|
|
well, if anyone cares, cain just won florida, with about 37% of the votes....straw poll, that is....
http://news.yahoo.com/rick-perry-hopes-florida-straw-poll-victory-181609435.html |
|
|
|
But there is not one story about him on their website...strange. I guess he doesn't fit their agenda. Actually the only reason I went to FOX was the link you posted........I rarely go there. News is too biased. What would we do for information without the internet? I disagree. There is news about Ron Paul all over the place. ITs not on LOCAL news in most places that dont have a relation to Ron Paul though. But it IS on news like Fox, CBS, ABC, USA, as well as written media like the Post, the Times, Wall STreet Journal, Chicago Tribune go to a search engine that searches news sources, there are about 10000 entries,,, of course you disagree, your watching through rose colored glasses Well, its a personal perception. Just like some dont agree with me when I perceive this president to be more highly scrutinized than others. I dont agree that Ron Paul has any more or less media attention than any other in his political status. |
|
|
|
Paul should be excused for his inability to answer important questions. There are many real-world questions that religions like libertarianism simply have no answer for. Not to mention he starts to stutter when he gets frusterated and the other candidates show people who he really is. 2008 Presidential Debates, Giuliani made hm stutter. |
|
|
|
I think Cain would be an awesome President.
You thought MIchelle Bachman was "awesome". I still do. I would still like to see her in office but I dont think she is electable. I would have no problem voting for Perry, Bachmann, Cain or Gingrich over Obama. I would still vote Romney over Obama but wouldn't be happy about it and I would definately vote Obama over Ron Paul and I know a lot of other Republicans who hate Obama but would vote for him over Paul as well. |
|
|
|
But there is not one story about him on their website...strange. I guess he doesn't fit their agenda. Actually the only reason I went to FOX was the link you posted........I rarely go there. News is too biased. What would we do for information without the internet? I disagree. There is news about Ron Paul all over the place. ITs not on LOCAL news in most places that dont have a relation to Ron Paul though. But it IS on news like Fox, CBS, ABC, USA, as well as written media like the Post, the Times, Wall STreet Journal, Chicago Tribune go to a search engine that searches news sources, there are about 10000 entries,,, of course you disagree, your watching through rose colored glasses Well, its a personal perception. Just like some dont agree with me when I perceive this president to be more highly scrutinized than others. I dont agree that Ron Paul has any more or less media attention than any other in his political status. the first place person and the third place person were mentioned WHERE? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Kleisto
on
Sun 09/25/11 03:21 AM
|
|
Here's one example.
http://news.yahoo.com/poll-romney-leads-hampshire-huntsman-third-perry-fourth-150212964.html Note the headline, and note who is missing. |
|
|
|
This is a friendly reminder to keep all attacks off the forums. If post are missing there is a reason for that, most likely due to the responses within them. Keep to the Topic within a debate form do not direct your responses towards others directly.
Site Mod Kristi |
|
|
|
the first place person and the third place person were mentioned WHERE? Here's one example. http://news.yahoo.com/poll-romney-leads-hampshire-huntsman-third-perry-fourth-150212964.html Note the headline, and note who is missing. Ummmm..............there, thanks Kliesto |
|
|
|
page not found,
but for what its worth, there are a million news sources out there, and if I wanted to show evidence of inaccurate, incomplete, or full out illegible reporting, I would use Yahoo news as well. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Peccy
on
Sun 09/25/11 08:56 AM
|
|
Poll: Romney leads New Hampshire, Huntsman in third, Perry in fourth
Mitt Romney still holds a commanding lead in New Hampshire, a state where Perry has barely broken through, according to a poll released Thursday. The Suffolk University/7News poll found Romney leading with 41 percent of the vote from independents and Republicans. His closest competition is Ron Paul, with 14 percent, followed by Jon Huntsman with an uncharacteristically high 10 percent. Perry, who has topped most national polls since announcing his candidacy, does not even break double digits, getting just 8 percent of the primary vote. Romney continues to have high popularity in the state, with 69 percent saying they hold a favorable opinion of him and just 20 percent saying they hold an unfavorable opinion. Voters are still much more ambiguous when it comes to Huntsman: Twenty-six percent say they have a favorable opinion of him, and 24 percent hold an unfavorable one. Another 24 percent have never heard of him, and 26 percent have yet to form an opinion. Approximately one-third of New Hampshire primary voters have either not heard of Perry or have yet to decide what they think of him. Among the remaining voters, 36 percent say they have a favorable opinion of him, while 32 percent say they have an unfavorable opinion. In New Hampshire, Romney is still seen as the favorite to win the election, with 28 percent saying they expect him to be the next president. Twenty-two percent expect Obama to win re-election, and 12 percent say Perry will be the next president. Thirty-two percent are undecided. In the 400-person sample of likely New Hampshire primary voters, 50 percent say they are Republicans, 42 percent unenrolled or independent, and 6 percent Democrats. Ideologically, 49 percent describe themselves as conservative, 42 percent as moderate, and 7 percent as liberal. That demographic breakdown has some New Hampshire strategists dismissing the results. “It’s crap,” emailed Patrick Hynes, a national Republican strategist who lives in New Hampshire. “Way too many independents (42-ish percent) sampled and way too many self identified liberals/moderates (49 percent).” “The numbers don’t make too much sense,” emailed New Hampshire Republican strategist Mike Dennehy. “Their sample includes 42 percent independents — should be 30 percent — and 49 percent are moderates/liberals which is WAY off — should be 35 at most. That’s why Romney is so high and explains Huntsman at 10.” Perry’s results seem somewhat low, given the 27 endorsements from state representatives he announced Wednesday. Dennehy said the numbers were probably somewhat off for Perry, given that conservatives — the demographic with which he gets the highest support in other polls — were underrepresented in the sample, but noted that the Texas governor has yet to make a major play in New Hampshire. “I believe Perry is at about 15 when you factor in more conservatives voters. Either way, Perry hasn’t been here too much and he hasn’t had any town hall style meetings. When he spends more time and campaigns the way he needs to I think he can do well. But New Hampshire is still Mitt’s to lose and he is extremely strong. And with respect to Huntsman, it’s important to note as many people dislike him as actually like him, which is a very unenviable place to be. That being said, he still has an opportunity but he’s going to need to spend a substantial amount of money to build a positive image.” Uh, for what it's worth, YAHOO didn't write the story. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 09/25/11 09:28 AM
|
|
Yahoo regularly posts pieces from a website called 'The Daily Caller'
The website is fairly new (under two years old) and their writing leaves much to be desired, judging by the many OTHER stories yahoo has posted (And copyrighted) from them. One of the founders was Dick Cheneys assistant. Yahoo did PRINT this story, and I question most the stories they PRINT , judging by my own perception of their poor choices in the past. |
|
|