Chazster Seriously, I'm curious. How much of the official story do you believe? All of it?

Look at the beams in these pictures. Does it look like they just "fell over?"

They turned to dust.

Looks to be falling to me. You can see the lower left pole seperate and fall more to the left from the first to second picture. The tallest post you can see drop down as it is falling farther down. That being said you also cant tell what kind of material is there. I assume some of it is concrete and that is where the dust is coming from. Steal doesn't turn to dust.

Infititly more than I believe anything you have posted. I believe airplanes hit the towers and the pentagon and that they were hijacked. I believe the towers fell due to structural damages and they fell according to physics.

More questions, for Chaster:

How do you know that we don't have the technology for those kind of high energy beam weapons?

Does the Military or government send you a memo about all their top secret weapons projects?

What do you suppose all this top secret stuff is about? If the government tells everyone everything then there should be no need for any "top secrets."

Why do you believe that?

Common sense. You think the government would spend billions of dollars on boeings laser plane if we had technology that far surpassed that? We dont have a power source to generate the kind of power that would be required to have a laser to take down a building. If we did it would be powering out country in a non military application.

Yes I used to work on military weapons and yes I have a security clearance fyi.

Also there is physics. Where is this device they are firing? They would have to have line of sight with nothing in the way. There would be residual heat. Windows would have been melting off. How would a weapon even work to collapse a building like that? Please describe how you think this so called weapon would work to take down a building.

Windows were melted off of many vehicles including a fire truck. You have not been looking at Dr. Wood's sight enough.

You are only 26 years old according to your profile. I find it very difficult to believe that you used to work on military weapons or that you have a "security clearance." Anyway there are many levels of security clearances.

I just don't believe you. Sorry.

Also, you have no way of knowing what kind of weapons we or anyone else has available.

But if we don't have them available, then who do you think would?

Aliens? Russians? China? Islamic terrorists?

Common sense tells me and anyone with common sense knows that 1400 cars were not burned to a crisp and melted by a plane hitting a tower on the 94th floor.

I could care less if you believe me. I worked for Lockheed Martin and have a security clearance. Defense contractors hire lots of young engineers. Melted windows on a car is different then on the building. They would have been melting off before the building collapse as the heat would have to penetrate from the outside. Please explain how this so called weapon is supposed to work and I can better explain how you are wrong.

Windows were melted off of many vehicles including a fire truck. You have not been looking at Dr. Wood's sight enough.

You are only 26 years old according to your profile. I find it very difficult to believe that you used to work on military weapons or that you have a "security clearance." Anyway there are many levels of security clearances.

I just don't believe you. Sorry.

There is no way a laser weapon is going to cause a building to collapse.

The Ranets E is a High Power Microwave (HPM) weapon system intended to produce electrically lethal damage or disruption and dysfunction in opposing airborne systems, be they aircraft or guided munitions in flight. The system was first disclosed by Rosoboronexport in 2001, but little technical detail has been disclosed since then.

The weapon uses an X-band pulsed 500 MegaWatt HPM source, generating 10 to 20 nanosecond pulses at a 500 Hz PRF, and average output power of 2.5 to 5 kiloWatts. The antenna is large enough to provide a gain of 45 to 50 dB in the X-band, for a total weapon weight of 5 tonnes. The weapon has been described as a "radio-frequency cannon" and Russian sources credit it with a lethal range of 20 miles against the electronic guidance systems of PGMs and aircraft avionic systems.

I don't think I ever specified what kind of weapon may have been used. I don't know.

But if I had to pick between what was available in 2001 I might pick something like Ranets E High Power Microwave Directed Energy Weapon. Or something similar.



But I don't know much about what technology was available then or how many different weapons they might be testing. I imagine they don't tell us everything.

They even have a brochure.

Okay if this weapon can disrupt and take down a plane, and a plane can disrupt and take down two towers, I think we have a winner.

Are you serious? Do you understand what that does? Its basically an EMP cannon. Think like the Matrix when they used the EMP to disable the machines. Its lethal to an aircraft because if its power is shot it falls from the sky. It wont do anything to a building.