You are correct, no one has ever proven it. Oh, I'm sure he's guilty of a few racist remarks in his life time, but show me someone who says they haven't and I'll show you a liar.

Not only that but if you look at this voting record, it backs up everything he has stated. He's not one of those who will say one thing and then vote another. How many politicians do you know who do that? If I had to guess, not very many.

Not when he bring in his supporters from other counties and states to vote in the straw poll's. None of the straw polls he has ever won have been accurate because of that fact and his Presidential election results over the years prove that.

Fortunately, not a lot of research is necessary. Paul makes it easy. One only needs to listen to his own words. Paul is right on a few issues. The wars, the Federal Reserve, drug laws, prostitution and some others. The vast majority of his credo is boiler-plate social Darwinist Libertarian. Can't work, wouldn't work, willl never work for anybody but the top-predator few.

and sell out Obama is doing so much better.........Yes We Can! he just left out the "destroy this country" part.

like you know what will work or not work... where did you take your economics and poly sci at?

Do you really mean to ask that? Have you ever heard of a Masters in Business Administration? You study lots of Economics in that program. Where did you take your economics and poly sci at? (We'll ignore ending our sentences with a preposition).

What kind of economics did you study? Not all economics is the same. Most economics departments in American Universities teach Keynesian economics. The Keyensians have never been accurate, and do not understand the business cycle or what causes it. They are good at creating mathematical models that don't reflect reality, though.

The Austrian school and Salamaca school have been the most accurate historically. These schools of economic though also incorporate praxaeology (the study of human action). Ron Paul personally knew and learned from the founder of the Austrian School, Ludwig Von Mises.

Nope it is in fact NOT racist. He also allowed them to use that footage, he was being trolled and took it well IMHO.

He is the most notable, honorable and intelligent candidate in years.

The more I research, the more I am inclined to absolutely agree. It would do well for the people that make outlandish and unsupported claims about the man to do so also. You might be surprised to find that his voting record backs what he says. If he weren't ruffling someone's feathers high-up, the news media wouldn't avoid mentioning him on purpose. And yes, in that straw poll they mentioned who came in first and who came in third. No mention of RP who came in 2nd by only a few hundred votes.

taking classes now to get an associate in business, not that it matters, i'm not the one making those definitive statements...

we all have things we don't like about of people, and being gay is not a race issue... but that is about the only thing i can say for sure about him, I think the dumbocrats were up to their tricks again.

Believe it or not, I also believe that Paul is an honorable man with integrity. Most of all, I believe he is honest. That racist material in his newsletter can be explained away easily. Paul has some very racist towns in his district, and it could well be that he has some wealthy, racist constituents that he doesn't want to offend. Nobody has accredited the remarks to anybody.

This does not change his hardcore Libertarian religion. Nor does it mitigate the same religion for his son.

what racist towns are those? can you be specific, please? since i live right next to it, i am interested

queer is bigoted language, not racist

unless we are going to move to make homosexuals a new race,,,

We talked about this a long time ago. Beaumont and Vidor came upin those talks.

i remember talking about pearland, being a very rich part of his district, but the coastal towns are tourist traps, not very racist. The basketball player Marcus Camby was arrested there today, on weed charges
(in Pearland)

Maybe I'm wrong about that, then. Maybe those racist remarks in Paul's newsletter can't be so easily explained away.