He's not MY President. I don't claim the jack@##. Never have I been this disgusted and ashamed of a President of the United States since Carter.

I know you're a hardcore "I hate Obama" conservative, but even you has to know that fox isn't the most trusted news source. Nor is it fair and balanced. Come on, man, use a little common sense.

You're not an American and living in the US? If you are, he's your President, no matter how much you hate him.

That isn't what you were asked or even what was said to you.

*Sigh*

However, several weeks later, in the wake of the North Korean Missile Crisis and the 2006 Lebanon War, Fox saw a surge in viewership and remained the #1 rated cable news channel. Fox still held eight of the ten most-watched nightly cable news shows, with The O'Reilly Factor and Hannity & Colmes coming in first and second places, respectively.

FNC ranked #8 for all cable channels in 2006 and #6 in 2007. The news channel surged to #1 during the week of Barack Obama's election (November 3–9) in 2008 and reached the top spot again in January 2010 during the week of the special Senate election in Massachusetts. Comparing Fox to its 24-hour news channel competitors, for the month of May 2010 the channel drew an average daily prime time audience of 1.8 million versus 747 000 for MSNBC and 595 000 for CNN.

As of January 2011, the Democratic Party-affiliated Public Policy Polling reports that Fox News Channel is the second-most trusted television news network in the country, with 42% of respondents reporting they trust the network, compared to other major news channels (behind PBS which stands at 50%, and ahead of NBC at 41%, CNN at 40%, CBS at 36%, and ABC at 35%). It was the first for the past few years because PBS(Local News) wasn't on the poll.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_news#Ratings_and_reception

This statement alone tells all we need to know about your respect for, not only the office, but the way in which we elect the people that hold it. I hate to ask you to open your eyes here, but if you truly believe in our system of government and the principals by which it was founded, you would never cast a remark such as this.

Having read you and your views, (As well as many of the things you copy and paste from fox news reports. They should have you on their payroll by now, btw.) for some time now, I do understand and forgive you for your ignorance.

/what 'situation' are we in? people are 'planning' terrible things? and this is some new 'situation'?


interesting


we arent in a 'situation', there is chatter and they are on it as best they can be

just like the BUSH administration was prior to 9/11

but lets hope this 'situation' doesnt end as badly..

No surprises here, more fear tactics to scare the masses as always.

If something happens, it'll be a terrorist that did it alright, but it will be the terrorist within. I personally think if they were gonna do anything, now would be the time. You got a lot of symbology here, 10 year anniversary, and also the date 9-11-11. They deal big time in numbers and numerology so would be something to think about here.

I fully expect for several to ignore and ridicule this of course, but I stand by it.

Two things, these idiots were CLEARLY on the governments radar for over a month. The CIA lost them, they dropped the ball big time, but don't think any operative can ok three terrorists to get into the country, I doubt the director of the CIA can even give that ok, he would have to come from your boy Obama.

SECOND, we have an awesome director of the CIA right now, the best we have had since dumbell took office a couple years ago BUT we don't have a President with the guts to give the order to him get these jerks BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY like the previous President did.

That's it, keep drinking the kool-aid.........

and how do we have information on what orders the President gives from day to day, and which he doesnt, when it comes to 'security'?

or how much 'control' he has over how well others PERFORM their jobs or CARRY OUT those orders?

Not...lol

Really? You think that a typical Agency Operative making $25,000 a year can authorize three people who are on the radar and have been identified as potential threats to enter the country? You are so blinded by your love of Obama.

It doesn't matter, either way he doesn't have the guts to handle this situation right. We sould turn all informants over to the Mossad and they will ummmmmm, question them properly.

rushing to action doesnt suit all situations,, sometimes you actually do catch HIGHER UPS and larger groups when you dont RUSH in in a fit of testesterone overload

and as I said,, I dont know what the president authorizes or doesnt from day to day and doubt anyone here has the clearance to claim they do either,,,

You obviously dont understand how terrorist cells work.

no more or less than anyone else, and I also dont know what orders the president gives from day to day , or doesnt,, when it comes to homeland security,,,,,(which was my original point)

would it be if u agreed with it? I guess what I am wondering here is whether the source is unreliable because you do not like what they say, or are they really not reliable?

I'm jsut asking as I really have no clue

I listen to NPR everyday, if I read it's reuters or der spiegel and pay no attention to the rest

and haven't heard anything about these threats yet on NPR...but I may have missed the reports as I jsut listen on my commute

ID say NPR is one of the more dependable because they dont really make the 'profit' that mainstream does off of big corporations, lobbies, advertisors,,etc,,,


Youtube is a spot where anyone can post and edit whatever they like however they like with no type of restrictions or guidelines(except perhaps copyright laws)

Somebody said the truth doesn’t hurt but that’s not true with you.