100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Biggest Applause Line | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. And the more populous the more food plants and animals need to feed said populous the more land clearing and killing of tree and the oxygen they support reduces yet again |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And use more steriods causing more diseases and problems like autism tell me how that is better when better becomes a problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. You are talking only the US. Asia already builds up. You end up living in a shoe box too. We soon will have to choose space for people or space for animals and crops. Eventually our population will surpass our technology. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. You are talking only the US. Asia already builds up. You end up living in a shoe box too. We soon will have to choose space for people or space for animals and crops. Eventually our population will surpass our technology. I dont see it happening anytime soon,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. You are talking only the US. Asia already builds up. You end up living in a shoe box too. We soon will have to choose space for people or space for animals and crops. Eventually our population will surpass our technology. I dont see it happening anytime soon,,, Just because it won't happen in the US anytime soon doesn't mean we should propel it to happen in an eventuality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. You are talking only the US. Asia already builds up. You end up living in a shoe box too. We soon will have to choose space for people or space for animals and crops. Eventually our population will surpass our technology. I dont see it happening anytime soon,,, Just because it won't happen in the US anytime soon doesn't mean we should propel it to happen in an eventuality I agree, hence the sharing more and using less but that doesnt fit the gluttonous reality that we have become accustomed to its not so much the earth not sustaining, so much as us demanding more than is needed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. You are talking only the US. Asia already builds up. You end up living in a shoe box too. We soon will have to choose space for people or space for animals and crops. Eventually our population will surpass our technology. I dont see it happening anytime soon,,, Just because it won't happen in the US anytime soon doesn't mean we should propel it to happen in an eventuality I agree, hence the sharing more and using less but that doesnt fit the gluttonous reality that we have become accustomed to its not so much the earth not sustaining, so much as us demanding more than is needed Then maybe the gluttonous ones you refer to that have caused their own health issues and won't change their habits should not have healthcare available to eliminate the ones that hinder the futre reducing gluttony and the populous? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony wrote:
diseases are also living matter....by interfering in that order you create an imbalance to the natural order....creating mass chaos......but yes it is the destiny that people die from disease the plague was defeated.....cancer has been around as long as species has and after the plague came aids.....we have west nile virus......again disease will come we won't defeat it......it won't happen the more we cure the worse and harder they because nature wishes it to be that way..... Okay and?? Diseases feed off hosts passing from one host to another making them a viable living entity?? Just trying to understand ur point here Hey you do have a point. In 1700 the population of the world was 610 million. A little over 300 years later it is over 6 billion. 10 times more in 300 years. So whats next? 60 billion in 2300? Maybe more with medical advances and people living longer etc. The continuing rise in population will eventually lead to a global war for resources unless we devise a way to build some kind of space colonies and make almost limitless resources. Then again we will all be dead before then... well probably. or,, we could adjust our lifestyles to share more and use less,, but you are probably right wars will be much more likely, and immediately 'economical' Can't really use less when it comes to things like food and land space. The earth can only sustain a limited amount of life. I think we can use less while building smarter. There is currently 115 per square mile, but we build TALLER, and that initial square footage of LAND AREA< becomes less relevant. We also find better ways to produce food and increase harvests and supplies. You are talking only the US. Asia already builds up. You end up living in a shoe box too. We soon will have to choose space for people or space for animals and crops. Eventually our population will surpass our technology. I dont see it happening anytime soon,,, Just because it won't happen in the US anytime soon doesn't mean we should propel it to happen in an eventuality I agree, hence the sharing more and using less but that doesnt fit the gluttonous reality that we have become accustomed to its not so much the earth not sustaining, so much as us demanding more than is needed Then maybe the gluttonous ones you refer to that have caused their own health issues and won't change their habits should not have healthcare available to eliminate the ones that hinder the futre reducing gluttony and the populous? I dont think I could single out gluttonous 'ones', I think we have a gluttonous CULTURE, and yet I still wouldnt encourage letting people DIE because of their financial situations which is much more of the reason they would die than how GLUTTONOUS they are, being that plenty of people with healthcare are likewise gluttonous, and plenty of wealthy are too.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Earth had a sustainable human population of around 2 billion. We now have over 6 billion. All of the rest of the Earth's bio systems are headed downhill... some very quickly. One third of the Earth's human population relies on fish for protein and ninety percent of predator the fish are gone from the oceans. We have greatly reduce the prey fish also and now they are disappearing too.
Brazil is cutting down rainforest to make croplands. Micronesia is dynamiting coral reefs to catch fish. Thirty percent of the Earth's coral reefs are dead or gone. Anyone that thinks we can build higher or smarter as our population expands is unaware of what is going on. We are rapidly killing the planet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdn1RpqKziE&NR=1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If its true, we are killing OURSELF,, perhaps natures way,, huh?
the planet will be fine, it may change or evolve to something HUMANS cant thrive on,, but it will still be fine(With or without us) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If its true, we are killing OURSELF,, perhaps natures way,, huh? the planet will be fine, it may change or evolve to something HUMANS cant thrive on,, but it will still be fine(With or without us) In the context of this thread and most similar written arenas, the use of the word "Earth" is not the rocks and lava. It is the life on the planet. We have already wiped out about a third of the species. Almost all of it depends upon the health of the oceans and they are in dire condition. It is not "nature's way". "If its true" ... speaks volumes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 09/15/11 01:32 PM
|
|
If its true, we are killing OURSELF,, perhaps natures way,, huh? the planet will be fine, it may change or evolve to something HUMANS cant thrive on,, but it will still be fine(With or without us) In the context of this thread and most similar written arenas, the use of the word "Earth" is not the rocks and lava. It is the life on the planet. We have already wiped out about a third of the species. Almost all of it depends upon the health of the oceans and they are in dire condition. It is not "nature's way". "If its true" ... speaks volumes. If its true speaks to how I dont always just take information from a public forum as valid or verified,,,,but that I consider it might be And in the context of life on planet earth, that is a more apt description of what is endangered although it still qualifies which life is significant, as there will most likely always be some form of 'life' on the planet,,, until nature decides otherwise,, because we need nature to survive, and if we get into a situation where the resources we need are not ENOUGH, we will die off, but those remaining resources will still be there,, |
|
|
|
|
