100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Get Destroyed | |
|---|---|
|
|
There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary! It's more like the other way around I'm afraid. al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence. The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!! No he did not admit it. They even admitted that it was an old tape. Pay attention! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded Clearly the are fakes. Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda?? I don't see anything clearly fake there and I recognize the voice of the guy narrating and he is a conspiracy nut that has his own radio show. He says its clearly a cartoon etc. The video isn't even high enough quality to look like a cartoon. Get a video specialists with no history of following conspiracies to do an analysis and if he can show with science reasons to think its fake I will believe him. I give no credit to radio hosts though. I don't like that guy either, but there are plenty more videos and opinions. I have yet to see a Bin laden video that is not really bad or fake. So where is YOUR proof that Osama Bin Laden admitted responsibility on any video tape? Where is it? Show me your proof. The burden of proof is on you people who make the claim. No you are making a claim that it is fake. I also think that the fact that he was in hiding and made no claims that it wasn't him point to the story being true. He knew people were hunting for him. Don't you think he is smart enough to try to claim innocence if he really was innocent? Sending information to other countries in the UN would be my first step if I were him. He had 10 years to claim innocence and didnt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No way this guy looks like Osama. I knew that was fake first time I saw it. geeze you people will believe anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eVwHAbmRI&feature=related Now THAT'S funny!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chazster said: That doesnt mean the government itself did not have access to the footage does it? I mean if people want to believe they are so powerful they planned it themselves I wouldn't think they would have a hard time getting footage before anyone else. Yes it does. How would the government itself have access to footage of the first plane hitting the tower? Its not like people normally sit around with their camera's trained on tall buildings waiting for something to happen. Also, even if some tourist did happen to film the first plane hit the tower there is no way it could have gotten into the hands of the President's security people a few minutes after the fact. No way. The only way the government would even have video of the first plane hitting the tower is if they filmed it them self and knew about it in advance. The only other explanation is that Bush was just making up stories as he went along as he often did. But how can you trust a president that lies so easily and so often that he can't keep things strait from what he is supposed to say and what he isn't supposed to say? At approximately 8:48 a.m. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first pictures of the burning World Trade Center were broadcast on live television. They were not videos of the FIRST plane hitting the tower. If Bush saw anything, that is what he had to have seen. But THIS IS WHAT HE SAID: "I SAW AN AIRPLANE HIT THE TOWER." Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-h4Zc57QKg So the official report about when Bush learned about the attack is a lie if he saw a video of a plane hitting the tower before he went into the class room. The official report is that he was told about the second plane when he was in the class room. There are other reports about when Bush heard about it also: Two accounts explicitly state Bush was told while in the motorcade. “The President was on Highway 301, just north of Main Street… [when] he received the news that a plane had crashed in New York City.” So what are they hiding? Why the lies about when they told Bush about the attack? Also this report says that there may have been an assassination attempt on Bush that morning: http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday Conclusion: If Bush did see a plane hit the tower on television, and it was not the first plane, then they are lying about when he was informed about the attack. What is going on? Why would the government not tell the President right away about what is going on???? Probably because the people who run this country don't inform the president of much at all. The president is just a figurehead and a puppet? Or is it because our government and security is just completely incompetent? Or he could have just been mistaken and thought what he saw on tv was the first plane hitting. People are not perfect and in fact mny people claim Bush isn't smart. Thus if you think he isn't intelligent it is easy to believe he was mistaken on what he thought he saw on tv. Yes and I covered that possibility and I asked why was the official story about when they informed the President about what was going on a lie? Why does the government tell us what they want us to hear rather than the truth? THEY ALWAYS LIE. The are covering up something if they think they always have to LIE. Again he could have saw the news and the tower but not remembered he didn't actually see the crash only the aftermath and then saw it the next day or saw the second crash the same day. Its not that hard to imagine. This doesn't mean an intentional lie he could just be mistaken about what he actually saw. I would argue if it was a cover up they would have drilled him more on the official story so he wouldn't say things like that in public. The fact he did say that leads one to believe that it is more of a memory problem then proof of a coverup. where is the footage of the plane with wings hitting the pentagon? i cant find it. why did they take out tons of insurance polices for terrorism 2 months ahead of the attack and then want payed twice as much for 2 separate attacks? why would the oil companys suppress hho gas if there was an oil shortage? why is there a shortage of phosphorous in the fertilizer? you need this to grow food why is everybody that witnessed ground zero first hand dead? what happened to john todd? why were there bigger bombs hidden inside oklahoma city when timothy mcveigh blew it up why wasnt our nsa,fbi,cia investigating the twin towers after the first bombing happened? why is there an owl on the front of our dollar bill? what is bohemian groove? since we killed bin laden why isnt the war over? why is there really fluoride in the water?msg in all the food? why is there aspartame,saccharine and sucralose in all our food? why are they putting from many come one on our coins? just to start with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so the new tvs are 240+ frames per second and the pentagon 1 frame per second.
what century are you living in? so if i drive more that 1 frame per second they wont see me? i guess they only have 1 camera too? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No way this guy looks like Osama. I knew that was fake first time I saw it. geeze you people will believe anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eVwHAbmRI&feature=related Now THAT'S funny!
Before Osama became such a well known terrorist, I drew a picture of him. I know his face extremely well. He was a very good looking man. I have seen a number of fake pictures and videos of a guy with a beard that I'm sure were not him but was claimed to be him. Just because a guy has a beard and a turban that does not mean it looks like Osama Bin Laden. After I do a portrait of a person, I know his face very well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No way this guy looks like Osama. I knew that was fake first time I saw it. geeze you people will believe anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eVwHAbmRI&feature=related geez, if we are that dumb and believe anything as you claim, then why don't we believe the truthers? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No way this guy looks like Osama. I knew that was fake first time I saw it. geeze you people will believe anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eVwHAbmRI&feature=related geez, if we are that dumb and believe anything as you claim, then why don't we believe the truthers? because the news told you 1000 times the terrorist are going to do it then when it happened you already had the answer now they are in the process of setting up the homegrown terrorist(you) so lets kill the christians |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No way this guy looks like Osama. I knew that was fake first time I saw it. geeze you people will believe anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eVwHAbmRI&feature=related geez, if we are that dumb and believe anything as you claim, then why don't we believe the truthers? because the news told you 1000 times the terrorist are going to do it then when it happened you already had the answer now they are in the process of setting up the homegrown terrorist(you) so lets kill the christians maybe yall should stop drinking the kool-aid now, it really isn't that good for you...the government lies, the people in the government lie, obama lies, bush lied, even my kids lied to me... but to believe everything is a conspiracy? what do you not consider a conspiracy? imean, come on - all the wars, tsa, the jews, underground bunkers, the devil, god, 9/11, the Illuminati, the masons, does the conspiracy theories ever just stop? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
maybe i tuned in late that day but i didnt see the first impact until later.sure i saw the aftermath.how would they of gotten footage of the first impact? but i have yet to see any proof that a plane hit the pentagon.the rockafellers had a front row seat of the whole event.they rented rooms facing the towers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xorR2Yo84Jo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoJQJN1jOlc&feature=related 911 was a satanic ritual sacrifice. this is just to set up the nwo and the mark of the beast 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary! It's more like the other way around I'm afraid. al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence. If you want it bad enough you can find it, I won't do your work for you, especially if you're just gonna take a crap on it. No point. I have better things to do than waste time on someone who isn't gonna listen.  That's because you know it doesn't exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chazster said: That doesnt mean the government itself did not have access to the footage does it? I mean if people want to believe they are so powerful they planned it themselves I wouldn't think they would have a hard time getting footage before anyone else. Yes it does. How would the government itself have access to footage of the first plane hitting the tower? Its not like people normally sit around with their camera's trained on tall buildings waiting for something to happen. Also, even if some tourist did happen to film the first plane hit the tower there is no way it could have gotten into the hands of the President's security people a few minutes after the fact. No way. The only way the government would even have video of the first plane hitting the tower is if they filmed it them self and knew about it in advance. The only other explanation is that Bush was just making up stories as he went along as he often did. But how can you trust a president that lies so easily and so often that he can't keep things strait from what he is supposed to say and what he isn't supposed to say? At approximately 8:48 a.m. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first pictures of the burning World Trade Center were broadcast on live television. They were not videos of the FIRST plane hitting the tower. If Bush saw anything, that is what he had to have seen. But THIS IS WHAT HE SAID: "I SAW AN AIRPLANE HIT THE TOWER." Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-h4Zc57QKg So the official report about when Bush learned about the attack is a lie if he saw a video of a plane hitting the tower before he went into the class room. The official report is that he was told about the second plane when he was in the class room. There are other reports about when Bush heard about it also: Two accounts explicitly state Bush was told while in the motorcade. “The President was on Highway 301, just north of Main Street… [when] he received the news that a plane had crashed in New York City.” So what are they hiding? Why the lies about when they told Bush about the attack? Also this report says that there may have been an assassination attempt on Bush that morning: http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday Conclusion: If Bush did see a plane hit the tower on television, and it was not the first plane, then they are lying about when he was informed about the attack. What is going on? Why would the government not tell the President right away about what is going on???? Probably because the people who run this country don't inform the president of much at all. The president is just a figurehead and a puppet? Or is it because our government and security is just completely incompetent? *Sign* start reading what people post, this is the second time i've posted this. Jules Clément Naudet and Thomas Gédéon Naudet are French filmmakers. The brothers, residents of the United States since 1989, were in New York City at the time of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Jules captured footage of American Airlines Flight 11(The first plane) hitting the North tower of the World Trade Center. On the morning of 9/11, Jules was taping as firefighters examined a reported gas leak when American Airlines Flight 11 flew right over him and slammed head-on into the North Tower. Although in the footage, the plane is not seen until the impact is about to happen, the sound of the jet's engines can be heard clearly beforehand as well as the firefighter's reaction to it. The Naudet video footage thus became some of the most comprehensive on-site coverage of the 9/11 attacks in New York. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_and_Gedeon_Naudet This was supplied to law enforcement immediately. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary! It's more like the other way around I'm afraid. al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence. The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!! No he did not admit it. They even admitted that it was an old tape. Pay attention! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded Clearly they are fakes. Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda?? Old tapes talking about current world events?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary! It's more like the other way around I'm afraid. al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence. The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!! No he did not admit it. They even admitted that it was an old tape. Pay attention! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded Clearly the are fakes. Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda?? I don't see anything clearly fake there and I recognize the voice of the guy narrating and he is a conspiracy nut that has his own radio show. He says its clearly a cartoon etc. The video isn't even high enough quality to look like a cartoon. Get a video specialists with no history of following conspiracies to do an analysis and if he can show with science reasons to think its fake I will believe him. I give no credit to radio hosts though. I don't like that guy either, but there are plenty more videos and opinions. I have yet to see a Bin laden video that is not really bad or fake. So where is YOUR proof that Osama Bin Laden admitted responsibility on any video tape? Where is it? Show me your proof. The burden of proof is on you people who make the claim. The guy didn't goto the Los Angeles Film School and had Radio Shack dinosaur camera's, of course the videos are going to be bad. What are you expecting, a Speilberg masterpiece?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chazster said: That doesnt mean the government itself did not have access to the footage does it? I mean if people want to believe they are so powerful they planned it themselves I wouldn't think they would have a hard time getting footage before anyone else. Yes it does. How would the government itself have access to footage of the first plane hitting the tower? Its not like people normally sit around with their camera's trained on tall buildings waiting for something to happen. Also, even if some tourist did happen to film the first plane hit the tower there is no way it could have gotten into the hands of the President's security people a few minutes after the fact. No way. The only way the government would even have video of the first plane hitting the tower is if they filmed it them self and knew about it in advance. The only other explanation is that Bush was just making up stories as he went along as he often did. But how can you trust a president that lies so easily and so often that he can't keep things strait from what he is supposed to say and what he isn't supposed to say? At approximately 8:48 a.m. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first pictures of the burning World Trade Center were broadcast on live television. They were not videos of the FIRST plane hitting the tower. If Bush saw anything, that is what he had to have seen. But THIS IS WHAT HE SAID: "I SAW AN AIRPLANE HIT THE TOWER." Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-h4Zc57QKg So the official report about when Bush learned about the attack is a lie if he saw a video of a plane hitting the tower before he went into the class room. The official report is that he was told about the second plane when he was in the class room. There are other reports about when Bush heard about it also: Two accounts explicitly state Bush was told while in the motorcade. “The President was on Highway 301, just north of Main Street… [when] he received the news that a plane had crashed in New York City.” So what are they hiding? Why the lies about when they told Bush about the attack? Also this report says that there may have been an assassination attempt on Bush that morning: http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday Conclusion: If Bush did see a plane hit the tower on television, and it was not the first plane, then they are lying about when he was informed about the attack. What is going on? Why would the government not tell the President right away about what is going on???? Probably because the people who run this country don't inform the president of much at all. The president is just a figurehead and a puppet? Or is it because our government and security is just completely incompetent? *Sign* start reading what people post, this is the second time i've posted this. Jules Clément Naudet and Thomas Gédéon Naudet are French filmmakers. The brothers, residents of the United States since 1989, were in New York City at the time of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Jules captured footage of American Airlines Flight 11(The first plane) hitting the North tower of the World Trade Center. On the morning of 9/11, Jules was taping as firefighters examined a reported gas leak when American Airlines Flight 11 flew right over him and slammed head-on into the North Tower. Although in the footage, the plane is not seen until the impact is about to happen, the sound of the jet's engines can be heard clearly beforehand as well as the firefighter's reaction to it. The Naudet video footage thus became some of the most comprehensive on-site coverage of the 9/11 attacks in New York. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_and_Gedeon_Naudet This was supplied to law enforcement immediately. i posted that footage, along with a live feed on cnn that showed the first plane hitting the tower, but, as usual, they didn't even bother to watch it... they want to keep saying they didn't show it till the next day, which we all know is a false statement... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No way this guy looks like Osama. I knew that was fake first time I saw it. geeze you people will believe anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eVwHAbmRI&feature=related geez, if we are that dumb and believe anything as you claim, then why don't we believe the truthers? because the news told you 1000 times the terrorist are going to do it then when it happened you already had the answer now they are in the process of setting up the homegrown terrorist(you) so lets kill the christians maybe yall should stop drinking the kool-aid now, it really isn't that good for you...the government lies, the people in the government lie, obama lies, bush lied, even my kids lied to me... but to believe everything is a conspiracy? what do you not consider a conspiracy? imean, come on - all the wars, tsa, the jews, underground bunkers, the devil, god, 9/11, the Illuminati, the masons, does the conspiracy theories ever just stop? You left out faking the moon landing! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No way this guy looks like Osama. I knew that was fake first time I saw it. geeze you people will believe anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eVwHAbmRI&feature=related geez, if we are that dumb and believe anything as you claim, then why don't we believe the truthers? because the news told you 1000 times the terrorist are going to do it then when it happened you already had the answer now they are in the process of setting up the homegrown terrorist(you) so lets kill the christians maybe yall should stop drinking the kool-aid now, it really isn't that good for you...the government lies, the people in the government lie, obama lies, bush lied, even my kids lied to me... but to believe everything is a conspiracy? what do you not consider a conspiracy? imean, come on - all the wars, tsa, the jews, underground bunkers, the devil, god, 9/11, the Illuminati, the masons, does the conspiracy theories ever just stop? You left out faking the moon landing! lol, i was just thinking recent events, but that too... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Thu 08/04/11 12:10 PM
|
|
There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary! It's more like the other way around I'm afraid. al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence. The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!! No he did not admit it. They even admitted that it was an old tape. Pay attention! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded Clearly the are fakes. Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda?? I don't see anything clearly fake there and I recognize the voice of the guy narrating and he is a conspiracy nut that has his own radio show. He says its clearly a cartoon etc. The video isn't even high enough quality to look like a cartoon. Get a video specialists with no history of following conspiracies to do an analysis and if he can show with science reasons to think its fake I will believe him. I give no credit to radio hosts though. I don't like that guy either, but there are plenty more videos and opinions. I have yet to see a Bin laden video that is not really bad or fake. So where is YOUR proof that Osama Bin Laden admitted responsibility on any video tape? Where is it? Show me your proof. The burden of proof is on you people who make the claim. The guy didn't goto the Los Angeles Film School and had Radio Shack dinosaur camera's, of course the videos are going to be bad. What are you expecting, a Speilberg masterpiece?
Well if they have the smarts to plan and execute 9-11 and crash huge planes into the twin towers... (not easy to do by the way) then yes I expect a better video. They are fake. Also the one they claim Osama took credit for 9-11 was NOT in English and the names he mentioned in that video were NOT the same people who were accused of high -jacking the planes. Not to mention that the man was NOT Osama Bin laden. The date nor the twin towers were ever mentioned in the video. Just a bunch of generalities that could have bee about any terrorist attack. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chazster said: That doesnt mean the government itself did not have access to the footage does it? I mean if people want to believe they are so powerful they planned it themselves I wouldn't think they would have a hard time getting footage before anyone else. Yes it does. How would the government itself have access to footage of the first plane hitting the tower? Its not like people normally sit around with their camera's trained on tall buildings waiting for something to happen. Also, even if some tourist did happen to film the first plane hit the tower there is no way it could have gotten into the hands of the President's security people a few minutes after the fact. No way. The only way the government would even have video of the first plane hitting the tower is if they filmed it them self and knew about it in advance. The only other explanation is that Bush was just making up stories as he went along as he often did. But how can you trust a president that lies so easily and so often that he can't keep things strait from what he is supposed to say and what he isn't supposed to say? At approximately 8:48 a.m. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first pictures of the burning World Trade Center were broadcast on live television. They were not videos of the FIRST plane hitting the tower. If Bush saw anything, that is what he had to have seen. But THIS IS WHAT HE SAID: "I SAW AN AIRPLANE HIT THE TOWER." Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-h4Zc57QKg So the official report about when Bush learned about the attack is a lie if he saw a video of a plane hitting the tower before he went into the class room. The official report is that he was told about the second plane when he was in the class room. There are other reports about when Bush heard about it also: Two accounts explicitly state Bush was told while in the motorcade. “The President was on Highway 301, just north of Main Street… [when] he received the news that a plane had crashed in New York City.” So what are they hiding? Why the lies about when they told Bush about the attack? Also this report says that there may have been an assassination attempt on Bush that morning: http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday Conclusion: If Bush did see a plane hit the tower on television, and it was not the first plane, then they are lying about when he was informed about the attack. What is going on? Why would the government not tell the President right away about what is going on???? Probably because the people who run this country don't inform the president of much at all. The president is just a figurehead and a puppet? Or is it because our government and security is just completely incompetent? *Sign* start reading what people post, this is the second time i've posted this. Jules Clément Naudet and Thomas Gédéon Naudet are French filmmakers. The brothers, residents of the United States since 1989, were in New York City at the time of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Jules captured footage of American Airlines Flight 11(The first plane) hitting the North tower of the World Trade Center. On the morning of 9/11, Jules was taping as firefighters examined a reported gas leak when American Airlines Flight 11 flew right over him and slammed head-on into the North Tower. Although in the footage, the plane is not seen until the impact is about to happen, the sound of the jet's engines can be heard clearly beforehand as well as the firefighter's reaction to it. The Naudet video footage thus became some of the most comprehensive on-site coverage of the 9/11 attacks in New York. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_and_Gedeon_Naudet This was supplied to law enforcement immediately. i posted that footage, along with a live feed on cnn that showed the first plane hitting the tower, but, as usual, they didn't even bother to watch it... they want to keep saying they didn't show it till the next day, which we all know is a false statement... That video was shown in the evening, not that morning right after it happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary! It's more like the other way around I'm afraid. al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence. The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!! No he did not admit it. They even admitted that it was an old tape. Pay attention! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded Clearly the are fakes. Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda?? I don't see anything clearly fake there and I recognize the voice of the guy narrating and he is a conspiracy nut that has his own radio show. He says its clearly a cartoon etc. The video isn't even high enough quality to look like a cartoon. Get a video specialists with no history of following conspiracies to do an analysis and if he can show with science reasons to think its fake I will believe him. I give no credit to radio hosts though. I don't like that guy either, but there are plenty more videos and opinions. I have yet to see a Bin laden video that is not really bad or fake. So where is YOUR proof that Osama Bin Laden admitted responsibility on any video tape? Where is it? Show me your proof. The burden of proof is on you people who make the claim. The guy didn't goto the Los Angeles Film School and had Radio Shack dinosaur camera's, of course the videos are going to be bad. What are you expecting, a Speilberg masterpiece?
Well if they have the smarts to plan and execute 9-11 and crash huge planes into the twin towers... (not easy to do by the way) then yes I expect a better video. They are fake. Also the one they claim Osama took credit for 9-11 was NOT in English and the names he mentioned in that video were NOT the same people who were accused of high -jacking the planes. Not to mention that the man was NOT Osama Bin laden. The date nor the twin towers were ever mentioned in the video. Just a bunch of generalities that could have bee about any terrorist attack. they are all against you, JB....they knew that you knew that they should have better cameras and better quality equipment, so they didn't buy the good stuff, like you would expect... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary! It's more like the other way around I'm afraid. al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence. The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!! No he did not admit it. They even admitted that it was an old tape. Pay attention! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded Clearly the are fakes. Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda?? I don't see anything clearly fake there and I recognize the voice of the guy narrating and he is a conspiracy nut that has his own radio show. He says its clearly a cartoon etc. The video isn't even high enough quality to look like a cartoon. Get a video specialists with no history of following conspiracies to do an analysis and if he can show with science reasons to think its fake I will believe him. I give no credit to radio hosts though. I don't like that guy either, but there are plenty more videos and opinions. I have yet to see a Bin laden video that is not really bad or fake. So where is YOUR proof that Osama Bin Laden admitted responsibility on any video tape? Where is it? Show me your proof. The burden of proof is on you people who make the claim. The guy didn't goto the Los Angeles Film School and had Radio Shack dinosaur camera's, of course the videos are going to be bad. What are you expecting, a Speilberg masterpiece?
Well if they have the smarts to plan and execute 9-11 and crash huge planes into the twin towers... (not easy to do by the way) then yes I expect a better video. They are fake. Also the one they claim Osama took credit for 9-11 was NOT in English and the names he mentioned in that video were NOT the same people who were accused of high -jacking the planes. Not to mention that the man was NOT Osama Bin laden. The date nor the twin towers were ever mentioned in the video. Just a bunch of generalities that could have bee about any terrorist attack. Why would you expect better? They wern't trying to win an oscar just get their twisted message out there. |
|
|
|
|
