Ummmmmm, he did.

That's the sad thing, she only looks at the party affiliation on the ballot and not the name.

He's definately a lunatic............. Racist I personally think so, but if not he has allowed racist ideology to be published in his mmaterials, which raises questions.

Yikes! This girl I have been talking to and getting to know voted for Obama. I asked her why and she said "Because he is black, the same reason everyone else I know voted for him."

That's why were in this mess. I wish people wern't that ignorant.

I knew a guy who voted for Bush over Kerry because his dad was paying him $100 to do so. I also knew a girl three years ago who was voting for McCain because her dad was a Republican and told her in every election who she should vote for. It happens everywhere and for every candidate, not just Obama.

Voting for someone based on skin color is racist, just as voting against someone because of skin color is racist. That should not be a factor. There were more people voting for Obama because of his skin color in this last election then in every election combined on people getting paid by a friend for their vote or parents telling kids who to vote for.

Don't get me wrong, I agree that its still racism to vote for color, whether for or against ... and I knew several people who voted against for that reason.

What I'm saying is that many people vote based on any number of superficial reasons rather than real issues in every election. How is voting race much different than on the basis of sex (Hilary Clinton, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann)? What about faithfully voting Republican or Democrat even if you agree with the message from the other side (how many times I heard 'I like John Kerry, but I have to vote Republican' back in 2004 ...)?

And now you ... stating that Ron Paul is "looney" without highlighting any reason why you think so leaves me to guess you don't like him because the rest of the GOP tells you you shouldn't ... making that just as superficial a reason as any.

So, hopefully this brings us back to the topic YOU STARTED and you can tell us exactly why you think Ron Paul is loony ... or was that just your way of attempting to discredit a valid candidate so you can advocate Michelle Bachmann?

It's not different then voting for sex, but it is different then voting down the Party line since you are voting for the ideals of the party the candidate is affiliated with. It's a lot different then voting just based on skin color, sex, hair color, having two penises etc.

I have said in this thread and many other threads why I think he is looney. His views make no sense, he just babbles and when confronted he stutters and is incoherant. He is so far out there it's scary.

So still nothing specific against Dr Paul? You posted a very good article by him, can you refute anything he said with more than slurs?

All I see is people making baseless accusations.

What a dip shyte, I wouldn't brag about talking to her.

LOL

Denial is bliss I heard.

hell, looking at pictures of old ugly men when i walk into a va health clinc is beginning to wear a little thin. next time around i'm voting for the prettiest lady candidate. doesn't much matter whose in the white house. my candidates lose sometimes, my cadidates win sometimes, but nothing ever changes anyway. so i may as well look at a pretty face next time i see my cardiologist.

You have made not a single argument to refute. I am waiting for anything what so ever????

I suppose it really is unrealistic to expect you to come up with something since your opinion is irrational.

There has been none, just more political ankle biting. Freedom has never been so trampled in US history and all we the people can do is play at highschool name calling and he said she said BS.

This is a GOOD reason to NOT vote for the status quo.

Ron Paul is a real American Hero, he is the only person willing to stand up against the greedy corporate lobbyist, the misuse of wars to prop up the rich. The fed whose fingers are in every market and artificially support wall streets greed.

WAKE UP AMERICA.

Many Democrats are now supporting Paul, do you think Obama has the will to end the war on drugs? NO, he is just towing the line, do you think he will stand up to the corporate interests? No, do you really think he is about transparency? No..

You wanna talk about irrational, Obama won a peace award, and has done NOTHING to promote peace, he has consistently continued the policies of Bush.

His approval rating among Muslims was high 3 years ago when he was campaigning because he made promises to end the disastrous foreign policies that have spent trillions on wars. His approval rating among Muslims now is lower than Bushes when he left office, why, becuase they have seen the promise and seen the reality of it not being fulfilled.

I voted for Obama, I believed in his charge, and he has failed to deliver, I am as certain I exist as I am certain that neither of the entrenched candidates of either party will ever be for real change.

The only reason Paul is running as a republican is becuase to not run as either a demo repub leads nowhere. We have created an ivory tower of reality TV where we want pretty faces and prettier lies to make us feel good, but do not want to take our time away from Iron Chef to really dig into the real problems facing America.

i was always under the impression that's why you voted and like berry so much...

Again denial is bliss I guess because you are staying there.

He is a lunatic and racist to boot.

The lunacy is obvious if you listen to him talk or read what he writes.

You really don't need any more proof of it....lol

Poly want a cracker?

You want to support your assertions? You cant can you?

Do you want the war on drugs to continue?
Do you want us to continue to spend trillions to bribe, maim and kill other people across the world pretending this brings up security?

I think you just want a nice cozy lie to wrap yourself in till we all end up as puppets of the nanny state.

I can say the same of you.

I do know that Paul is not the answer to this countries problems, he would actually take us back to worse times of more racial bias and even more uncontrollable corporate problems. Along with class/economic status warfare.

As to stopping the wars, he wouldn't succeed any better then Obama did with an uncooperative congress.

He's right, you know. I have actually respected what you have to say in some of threads because you often actually back it up with sound reasoning ... I may not always agree, but I respect. However, here, you sound like my grandmother's bird. "Ron Paul is bad. Squawk! Ron Paul is bad." "Why?" "Squawk! Ron Paul is bad."

Saying "if you just read what he says, its obvious" is the exact same as the religions saying the same about the Bible. Back up your opinion, or be no better than they are.

Why?

LOL we all know you haven't got one thing right when it comes to me so no surprise here....lol