Topic: Western countries step up security after bin Laden | |
---|---|
Western countries step up security after bin Laden killing
May 3, 2011, 14:51 GMT Berlin - Several Western countries on Tuesday announced increased security measures at potential terrorist targets after US forces this week killed al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in a raid in Pakistan. The United States announced it was halting public services at its embassy and consulates in the Pakistani cities of Peshawar, Lahore and Karachi, though a spokesman said the offices would remain open for other business, including emergency support of US citizens. Spain was boosting security at its embassies in North Africa, the Sahel region, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Interior Minister Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba said. Madrid would also advise Spanish aid workers and companies operating in those regions to step up security measures, the minister said. http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/usa/news/article_1636781.php/Western-countries-step-up-security-after-bin-Laden-killing __________________________________________________________________ Now, that said, why is our Southern Border still wide open? IMO,it is the most vulnerable and BHOsama ignores it. Is our National Security not worth his effort or is the Latino vote more important to him? |
|
|
|
I think we'll just let our southern border open and let'em walk in. Or do what they do to us Americans when we go to Mexico, get raped, killed, and held hostage. I said to to hell with'em. Wall it up!!
|
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else.
None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. |
|
|
|
do you live in LA????
MOVE!!!!!!!! on a serious note... *** `em. ding dong the witch is dead ect ect... |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. Look up SPP while you're at it also. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIW-BZ8oLrk&feature=player_embedded |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() leonard peltier j edgar hoover taxation without representation the committee on unamerican activities blackballing chicago 7 miranda our country has been at war with itself since the New Deal. Under the guise of internal security. almost anyone who speaks the truth publicly or takes on organized crime in a political arena comes to a bad end john f kennedy martin luther king jr bobby ![]() |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home texas won't secede, we've talking about that since the 70's and it's no further along now than it was then...everything Canada has, we have our own, we don't really need any of their resources... I'm not talking bad about canada, it's s good country, along the lines as good place to live, but as a world resource, i guess they have plenty of wood...and Mexico, what resources do they have that we would even think about needing?... cheap labor? is that it? |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... Well the Mexicans do give us some good food........(ducks) ![]() The whole point of it though as I understand it, would be consolidating the world even further down, setting the stage for a one world government. The European Union sort of took the lead towards going in that direction when it was formed. A North American one would be the next step I suppose. |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... Well the Mexicans do give us some good food........(ducks) ![]() The whole point of it though as I understand it, would be consolidating the world even further down, setting the stage for a one world government. The European Union sort of took the lead towards going in that direction when it was formed. A North American one would be the next step I suppose. i would agree with you more if it was all the America's, central and south too... but just North America sounds more like a power play by the US... The EU seems like it is dying out, once the countries saw what it really is... |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home texas won't secede, we've talking about that since the 70's and it's no further along now than it was then...everything Canada has, we have our own, we don't really need any of their resources... I'm not talking bad about canada, it's s good country, along the lines as good place to live, but as a world resource, i guess they have plenty of wood...and Mexico, what resources do they have that we would even think about needing?... cheap labor? is that it? with Mexico the only really thing there is agrandizement of the border with Canada another frontier to ruin. fortunately I doubt they'd let us besides as some point the whole notion loses merit - best friends should not always marry. We are prolly better off as allies than trying to become a single function |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... Well the Mexicans do give us some good food........(ducks) ![]() The whole point of it though as I understand it, would be consolidating the world even further down, setting the stage for a one world government. The European Union sort of took the lead towards going in that direction when it was formed. A North American one would be the next step I suppose. i would agree with you more if it was all the America's, central and south too... but just North America sounds more like a power play by the US... The EU seems like it is dying out, once the countries saw what it really is... Is it? I hadn't really given that too much thought. Understand too, that something like this much like with all the other stuff they have pulled on the people over the years, is a gradual process. It kinda has to be, because if they were to try it all at once, there's no way they'd get away with it. It's like the frog in a pot of boiling water, you put it in when the water is real hot, it'll jump right out. But if you put it in room temperature water, and slowly increase the heat to where it's boiling, by the time the frog knows what is happening it'll be too late. Know what I mean? |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home texas won't secede, we've talking about that since the 70's and it's no further along now than it was then...everything Canada has, we have our own, we don't really need any of their resources... I'm not talking bad about canada, it's s good country, along the lines as good place to live, but as a world resource, i guess they have plenty of wood...and Mexico, what resources do they have that we would even think about needing?... cheap labor? is that it? with Mexico the only really thing there is agrandizement of the border with Canada another frontier to ruin. fortunately I doubt they'd let us besides as some point the whole notion loses merit - best friends should not always marry. We are prolly better off as allies than trying to become a single function makes sense, i agree with that |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home texas won't secede, we've talking about that since the 70's and it's no further along now than it was then...everything Canada has, we have our own, we don't really need any of their resources... I'm not talking bad about canada, it's s good country, along the lines as good place to live, but as a world resource, i guess they have plenty of wood...and Mexico, what resources do they have that we would even think about needing?... cheap labor? is that it? with Mexico the only really thing there is agrandizement of the border with Canada another frontier to ruin. fortunately I doubt they'd let us besides as some point the whole notion loses merit - best friends should not always marry. We are prolly better off as allies than trying to become a single function makes sense, i agree with that as far as resources the Canadians have vast untouched waterways, land and mineral resources that prolly should remain untouched mexico has a tourism industry, natural resources, land that could really be improved upon but corruption is evident when what should be a thriving economy is a struggling one. Someone is stealing & cheating and doin' wrong there |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home texas won't secede, we've talking about that since the 70's and it's no further along now than it was then...everything Canada has, we have our own, we don't really need any of their resources... I'm not talking bad about canada, it's s good country, along the lines as good place to live, but as a world resource, i guess they have plenty of wood...and Mexico, what resources do they have that we would even think about needing?... cheap labor? is that it? with Mexico the only really thing there is agrandizement of the border with Canada another frontier to ruin. fortunately I doubt they'd let us besides as some point the whole notion loses merit - best friends should not always marry. We are prolly better off as allies than trying to become a single function makes sense, i agree with that as far as resources the Canadians have vast untouched waterways, land and mineral resources that prolly should remain untouched mexico has a tourism industry, natural resources, land that could really be improved upon but corruption is evident when what should be a thriving economy is a struggling one. Someone is stealing & cheating and doin' wrong there Mexico uses it own oil and gas. Pemex is Gov. owned. |
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Sun 05/15/11 10:22 AM
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home texas won't secede, we've talking about that since the 70's and it's no further along now than it was then...everything Canada has, we have our own, we don't really need any of their resources... I'm not talking bad about canada, it's s good country, along the lines as good place to live, but as a world resource, i guess they have plenty of wood...and Mexico, what resources do they have that we would even think about needing?... cheap labor? is that it? with Mexico the only really thing there is agrandizement of the border with Canada another frontier to ruin. fortunately I doubt they'd let us besides as some point the whole notion loses merit - best friends should not always marry. We are prolly better off as allies than trying to become a single function makes sense, i agree with that as far as resources the Canadians have vast untouched waterways, land and mineral resources that prolly should remain untouched mexico has a tourism industry, natural resources, land that could really be improved upon but corruption is evident when what should be a thriving economy is a struggling one. Someone is stealing & cheating and doin' wrong there Mexico uses it own oil and gas. Pemex is Gov. owned. and obama gave them a billion dollars about 6 months ago, for something to do with oil, deep water drilling in the gulf i think ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Because they don't intend to actually close it, why else. None of the things going on are for real safety, but rather the illusion of it while they justify more and more invasions of our rights and privacy. agreed...been saying that since before you were born... ![]() ![]() Curious Moe, do you believe in the idea of the NAU, or North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico? I have contended for a while that that's part of why the border remains open as well, meaning that it's in essence a sign of things to come. i'm not sure...i hate unions period... what does mexico do for us? what do they bring to the plate? same with canada... i seen no reason for us to even be friendly with them, much less have a union with with them... seems like a lopsided deal, with the US being on the short side again... I doubt the Canadians would go for it because of what we cannot bring to the table, Moe they would be wise to be concerned about our possible intentions to despoil their natural resources and with Arizona and Texas ready to secede, we have bigger fish to fry at home texas won't secede, we've talking about that since the 70's and it's no further along now than it was then...everything Canada has, we have our own, we don't really need any of their resources... I'm not talking bad about canada, it's s good country, along the lines as good place to live, but as a world resource, i guess they have plenty of wood...and Mexico, what resources do they have that we would even think about needing?... cheap labor? is that it? with Mexico the only really thing there is agrandizement of the border with Canada another frontier to ruin. fortunately I doubt they'd let us besides as some point the whole notion loses merit - best friends should not always marry. We are prolly better off as allies than trying to become a single function makes sense, i agree with that as far as resources the Canadians have vast untouched waterways, land and mineral resources that prolly should remain untouched mexico has a tourism industry, natural resources, land that could really be improved upon but corruption is evident when what should be a thriving economy is a struggling one. Someone is stealing & cheating and doin' wrong there Mexico uses it own oil and gas. Pemex is Gov. owned. and obama gave them a billion dollars about 6 months ago, for something to do with oil, deep water drilling in the gulf i think ![]() ![]() ![]() gee, he could give me a couple hundred thou and not even miss it then |
|
|