100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Aren't we all AMERICANS | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Eric Holder: Black Panther case focus demeans 'my people'
http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/0311/Eric_Holder_Black_Panther_case_focus_demeans_my_people.html Yes we need to remember the past, and the trials that we have been through as a country. But that doesn't excuse upholding the law! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the modern Black panthers are a mockery of what they were all about in the 60's. They can kiss my white azz fer sure!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Holder: Black Panther case focus demeans 'my people' http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/0311/Eric_Holder_Black_Panther_case_focus_demeans_my_people.html Yes we need to remember the past, and the trials that we have been through as a country. But that doesn't excuse upholding the law! we must uphold the law, I think they did uphold the law, to continue to use that incident as evidence of any norm or to compare it to the LEGALLY JUSTIFIED and ENCOURAGED discrimination of the past,, is a bit farfetched and , I can imagine, would be insulting to anyone who had lived through such times |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure the article is complete for a true understanding of the issue....the last paragraph states this particular incident was singled out...there were other issues concerning intimidations at voting sites?
intimidation at or around voting sites should be against the law no matter what the reasons...the point of having rights is to establish the common peoples ability to think for themselves and subsequently have a voice in their governing its almost laughable at this point to think the common people need any intimidation to be swayed in their vote...give them enough propaganda and the motivation to go...they do pretty much what they are told.. unfortunately, the common people, don't think for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure the article is complete for a true understanding of the issue....the last paragraph states this particular incident was singled out...there were other issues concerning intimidations at voting sites? intimidation at or around voting sites should be against the law no matter what the reasons...the point of having rights is to establish the common peoples ability to think for themselves and subsequently have a voice in their governing its almost laughable at this point to think the common people need any intimidation to be swayed in their vote...give them enough propaganda and the motivation to go...they do pretty much what they are told.. unfortunately, the common people, don't think for themselves. 
Many buy what MSN feeds 'em. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure the article is complete for a true understanding of the issue....the last paragraph states this particular incident was singled out...there were other issues concerning intimidations at voting sites? intimidation at or around voting sites should be against the law no matter what the reasons...the point of having rights is to establish the common peoples ability to think for themselves and subsequently have a voice in their governing its almost laughable at this point to think the common people need any intimidation to be swayed in their vote...give them enough propaganda and the motivation to go...they do pretty much what they are told.. unfortunately, the common people, don't think for themselves. Fortunatly there is nothing 'common' about the people that make up the population of the United States. They think for themselves allright... The vast majority just don't get into politics and therefore miss all the little games that take place... However the games have gotton so large that it 'wakes' the people from their personal path... That group the Japanese once called the 'sleeping giant'... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In an interview, he was asked why he didn't pursue legal action against the obvious voter intimidation from the new black panthers, he actually said he wouldn't because it would demean "his" people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In an interview, he was asked why he didn't pursue legal action against the obvious voter intimidation from the new black panthers, he actually said he wouldn't because it would demean "his" people. Ignorant fool!  
DUOH! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any chance there is evidence of this statement in anything but a he/said , she /said source
something that has been validated somehow and not just repeated...? |
|
|
|
|
