Topic: Do you think that.... | |
---|---|
Although I feel you are being overly defensive Cowboy, I agree to some extent. I avoid him for the crimes against me I am very uncomfortable plus he is still sexually excited by me which would not be a good situation if he tried it now but I do not wish harm on him. I just hope that no other girls have had to suffer at his hands.
|
|
|
|
How did we get on this anyway?
I am done reminiscing now Back to the restrictive nature of religion in people's lives, because that is what the OP was really about. |
|
|
|
It can be. Has been. Still is. However, we should not always be so quick to conclude that it is the religion.
|
|
|
|
How did we get on this anyway? I am done reminiscing now Back to the restrictive nature of religion in people's lives, because that is what the OP was really about. "In actuality the source of morality isn't really a part of this discussion" ?????????????????????? |
|
|
|
#8
#9 |
|
|
|
Dragoness,
There are numerous scriptures which clearly advise against being friends with sinners, eating with them, and things of that nature. Are these the kinds of things that you're referring to? I mean it causes one to choose between, right? Assuming one takes the verses literally. |
|
|
|
I disagree. If Christianity were about life, reward would not come after death, Reward doesn't come after death, only the grand prize. Ask and ye shall receive our father tells us. Ask and ye shall receive... bible quote... Therefore written by men using tools of man. Our Father in re god does not apply. God wrote it not. |
|
|
|
How did we get on this anyway? I am done reminiscing now Back to the restrictive nature of religion in people's lives, because that is what the OP was really about. "In actuality the source of morality isn't really a part of this discussion" ?????????????????????? Not in the OP |
|
|
|
Dragoness, There are numerous scriptures which clearly advise against being friends with sinners, eating with them, and things of that nature. Are these the kinds of things that you're referring to? I mean it causes one to choose between, right? Assuming one takes the verses literally. Correct. |
|
|
|
AB...
How ya doin' bruddah? Eloquent concise and accurate response. Excellent. |
|
|
|
It does certainly seem like should one hold that those words are true, and that they should follow them, then there must be some sort of conflict. It would alter one's behavior.
|
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. One of our new residents who is gay is finding acceptance from some where I work. He is very flamboyant and some can just can't handle it. I was at one of my AA meetings the other day and one of our members told me, "Don't worry you won't catch it and its not contagious." It was pertinent to one of our topics of disease. Of course, in our meetings you can find people from all walks of life. One of the ways we look at 'disease' is through the symptoms that a 'disease' can manifest itself. Some would even say that religion itself is a disease. Depending on which member you would talk to. That is why some are more agreeable to the term 'spirituality' than the term 'religion'. It goes right along with our 'attraction rather than promotion' tradition. Of course, when I first came to meetings everything was against my religion. But then I fit into the 'Some are sicker than others' category at that time. I mean I am still sick and don't want to lose my disease because otherwise at some point in time I might go back to that old stinking thinking that I am just normal as any other person and that just wouldn't do for me at all. I worked long and hard to get my disease and without my disease I would be all alone in this cruel and unforgiving world some refer to as the 'real' world. In the words of Morpheus, "Welcome to the real world." |
|
|
|
I am off for a while. Thanks Creative for your participation and for bringing it back to what I was originally trying to say.
Have a good night |
|
|
|
AB... How ya doin' bruddah? Eloquent concise and accurate response. Excellent. I thought that was you. I am still me. a rose in the wildnerness, wafting forth my still small fragrance though the sands receive not comfort from it. ty |
|
|
|
Although I feel you are being overly defensive Cowboy, I agree to some extent. I avoid him for the crimes against me I am very uncomfortable plus he is still sexually excited by me which would not be a good situation if he tried it now but I do not wish harm on him. I just hope that no other girls have had to suffer at his hands. Have you ever sat down with him and discussed this action he did upon you? Asked why he did as such? Searched deep inside of him to see exactly what was wrong in hopes that you could possibly bring hope to him and show him of his error? If not, why not? |
|
|
|
How did we get on this anyway? I am done reminiscing now Back to the restrictive nature of religion in people's lives, because that is what the OP was really about. "In actuality the source of morality isn't really a part of this discussion" ?????????????????????? Not in the OP That's good, so you do not claim that a person gets their morals from religion, right? |
|
|
|
It does certainly seem like should one hold that those words are true, and that they should follow them, then there must be some sort of conflict. It would alter one's behavior. understandable, yet it seems to me that a CHRISTIAN, is following the example of christ who not only BEFRIENDED sinners(of which he states we all are) but laid down his life for them,,, Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. John 15:13 I think it is a matter of seperating sin from sinner loving the person without pretending to love everything or even accept everything they do and say |
|
|
|
Guess it depends upon which part you read?
What about when one part conflicts with another? |
|
|
|
Guess it depends upon which part you read? What about when one part conflicts with another? I was always taught to dig deeper, due to translation issues, similar words are translated similarly although they actually have alternate meanings that are better suited to the context |
|
|
|
Dragoness, There are numerous scriptures which clearly advise against being friends with sinners, eating with them, and things of that nature. Are these the kinds of things that you're referring to? I mean it causes one to choose between, right? Assuming one takes the verses literally. Can you quote those numerous scriptures? |
|
|