100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Video Obama DOESN'T WANT YOU TO SEE! pt. 1 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What they left out is his business dealings, including his house transaction that involved Saddam's illegal arms dealer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 10/17/10 11:29 AM
|
|
lol,
1st chapter: why shouldnt she accept pay for a job she is doing,, she has taken low pay when she could have been making big bucks before she was first lady (btw, it wasnt her choice to be first lady, and as first lady she has tremendous expectation and responsibility added to her life) 2nd chapter: she didnt set not for profit policy by sitting on the board 3rd chapter: since when does anyone care that lawyers have million dollar homes 4th chapter: is the clip implying that his statement to walmart employees is insincere because a company on which Michele sits on some board paid their ceo crazy money (more guilt by association, I doubt Michele set the wages there or signed the checks) basically another minimal fact / personal interpretation piece using far fetched correlations but thats whats great about media,, its entertainment from which everyone can take what they 'need' this is too easy for people to do,, I can give you an example a certain person told expressed outrage on an internet site over vp biden suggesting in public that he might strangle republicans, even going so far as to suggest charges should be dropped what he DIDNT say, is that when speaking about his disagreement to mutilating a flag, he actually suggested not only doing HARM to the person who might do such a thing but making sure it went unprosecuted as well... see what I mean? more fluff,, wont find a person who has reached late forties and cant have different occasions in their life used as example of some inconsistency, even more likely if using the actions and words of all they worked with, purchased from, or spoke to as well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, 1st it wasnt her choice to be first lady 2nd she didnt set not for profit policy 3rd since when does anyone care that lawyers have million dollar homes 4th is the clip implying that his statement to walmart employees is insincere because a company on which Michele sits on some board paid their ceo crazy money (more guilt by association, I doubt Michele set the wages there or signed the checks) basically another minimal fact / personal interpretation piece using far fetched correlations but thats whats great about media,, its entertainment from which everyone can take what they 'need' No, it's all MAJOR ethics nono's, and she is very much running for office just as much as her husband is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign. of course, that was why I Stated that as first lady she has ALOT of responsibility laid at her shoulders and serving on a board of a company in no way makes her the reason or even accomplice to the companies pre existing policies,,, Im sure if one looked up the company they could find plenty of LEGITIMATE details about what it does and how it does it that wont exactly correlate to the fluff asserted here,,(mostly off the backs of immigrant workers,,,where is the proof of such a statement?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle Obama is a racist hypocrite too! Yep, change here folks. Now we got a Black Woman selling us out like Hillary Clinton did with her husband Slick Willy!
Do you understand what is wrong with a Not for Profit making a profit? Illegal? UMMMMMM! FOX IN THE HEN HOUSE! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign. of course, that was why I Stated that as first lady she has ALOT of responsibility laid at her shoulders and serving on a board of a company in no way makes her the reason or even accomplice to the companies pre existing policies,,, Im sure if one looked up the company they could find plenty of LEGITIMATE details about what it does and how it does it that wont exactly correlate to the fluff asserted here,,(mostly off the backs of immigrant workers,,,where is the proof of such a statement?) What about screwing minorities? I guess that's ok too? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle Obama is a racist hypocrite too! Yep, change here folks. Now we got a Black Woman selling us out like Hillary Clinton did with her husband Slick Willy! Do you understand what is wrong with a Not for Profit making a profit? Illegal? UMMMMMM! FOX IN THE HEN HOUSE! At least Obama is faithful(As far as we know). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign. of course, that was why I Stated that as first lady she has ALOT of responsibility laid at her shoulders and serving on a board of a company in no way makes her the reason or even accomplice to the companies pre existing policies,,, Im sure if one looked up the company they could find plenty of LEGITIMATE details about what it does and how it does it that wont exactly correlate to the fluff asserted here,,(mostly off the backs of immigrant workers,,,where is the proof of such a statement?) What about screwing minorities? I guess that's ok too? what does the First Lady have to do with screwing minorities? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle Obama is a racist hypocrite too! Yep, change here folks. Now we got a Black Woman selling us out like Hillary Clinton did with her husband Slick Willy! Do you understand what is wrong with a Not for Profit making a profit? Illegal? UMMMMMM! FOX IN THE HEN HOUSE! no, what is wrong with a not for profit making a profit,,, as long as the profit is not its GOAL? from http://business-law.freeadvice.com/corporations/non_profit_corporation.htm A "not for profit" corporation is one specifically formed for purposes other than operating a profit seeking business, such as a charitable, religious, education, or scientific purpose. There is, however, a mistaken belief that all "non-profits" cannot make money. It can -- either from its own charitable activities or from ways unrelated to the non-profit purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROSE COLORED GLASSES ARE ON! ROSE COLORED GLASSES ARE ON!
Not-for-profit means they operate as a NON PROFIT. Tax law BABY! Read it if you can understand it! Openly profiteering with a Not For Profit is ILLEGAL! Germany operates Insurance and Health Care as Not-For Profit operation and they do not go around making huge profits either. Also do some math, Wal Mart is how big and the CEO gets $10 Million. Michelle's company is smaller by more than half yet she gets $26 Million? Can you not see the disparity? Oh, but then her screwing minorities doesn't matter either? You need to remove your blinders! Tunnel Vision is not a good thing. Since when is handing out corporate officers $100 Million in Dividends "NOT PROFITING?" they did not give that money away. They gave it to themselves. Geyah! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign. of course, that was why I Stated that as first lady she has ALOT of responsibility laid at her shoulders and serving on a board of a company in no way makes her the reason or even accomplice to the companies pre existing policies,,, Im sure if one looked up the company they could find plenty of LEGITIMATE details about what it does and how it does it that wont exactly correlate to the fluff asserted here,,(mostly off the backs of immigrant workers,,,where is the proof of such a statement?) What about screwing minorities? I guess that's ok too? what does the First Lady have to do with screwing minorities? Watch the video and see what SHE approved of doing to minorities while in charge of the hospital. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, 1st it wasnt her choice to be first lady 2nd she didnt set not for profit policy 3rd since when does anyone care that lawyers have million dollar homes 4th is the clip implying that his statement to walmart employees is insincere because a company on which Michele sits on some board paid their ceo crazy money (more guilt by association, I doubt Michele set the wages there or signed the checks) basically another minimal fact / personal interpretation piece using far fetched correlations but thats whats great about media,, its entertainment from which everyone can take what they 'need' No, it's all MAJOR ethics nono's, and she is very much running for office just as much as her husband is. what is the ethical no no, and whose ethics will count to define them? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign. of course, that was why I Stated that as first lady she has ALOT of responsibility laid at her shoulders and serving on a board of a company in no way makes her the reason or even accomplice to the companies pre existing policies,,, Im sure if one looked up the company they could find plenty of LEGITIMATE details about what it does and how it does it that wont exactly correlate to the fluff asserted here,,(mostly off the backs of immigrant workers,,,where is the proof of such a statement?) What about screwing minorities? I guess that's ok too? what does the First Lady have to do with screwing minorities? Watch the video and see what SHE approved of doing to minorities while in charge of the hospital. I watched it, four chapters of questionable and unverifed facts mixed in with the editors personal inferences about what those 'facts' mean,,, as I said,, fluff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign. of course, that was why I Stated that as first lady she has ALOT of responsibility laid at her shoulders and serving on a board of a company in no way makes her the reason or even accomplice to the companies pre existing policies,,, Im sure if one looked up the company they could find plenty of LEGITIMATE details about what it does and how it does it that wont exactly correlate to the fluff asserted here,,(mostly off the backs of immigrant workers,,,where is the proof of such a statement?) What about screwing minorities? I guess that's ok too? what does the First Lady have to do with screwing minorities? Watch the video and see what SHE approved of doing to minorities while in charge of the hospital. I watched it, four chapters of questionable and unverifed facts mixed in with the editors personal inferences about what those 'facts' mean,,, as I said,, fluff Unverified? So your saying she they didn't buy their neighboring homes the same time the Rezko's did then Rezko sold half his property to Obama, making his property worthless? (He was\is one of the most corrupt political fixers in the Nations history). Michelle never served on non profits or hospital boards and took out rageous saleries? Wow. Every part of that video has been verified time and time again. What it failed to mention is that Saddam's illegal arms dealer financed the sale of both the homes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should read about Obama's father.He is a real work of art.He was married to 4 different women and had children by all of them.He skipped out and abandon 3 of his wives and their kids.Was a alcoholic who killed a man in a drunk driving accident.A second drunk driving accident cost him both of his legs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I guess you think the actions of spouses don't effect elections? Look at Betty Ford who was a falling down drunk in the White House. That sure didn't help her husbands campaign. of course, that was why I Stated that as first lady she has ALOT of responsibility laid at her shoulders and serving on a board of a company in no way makes her the reason or even accomplice to the companies pre existing policies,,, Im sure if one looked up the company they could find plenty of LEGITIMATE details about what it does and how it does it that wont exactly correlate to the fluff asserted here,,(mostly off the backs of immigrant workers,,,where is the proof of such a statement?) What about screwing minorities? I guess that's ok too? what does the First Lady have to do with screwing minorities? Watch the video and see what SHE approved of doing to minorities while in charge of the hospital. I watched it, four chapters of questionable and unverifed facts mixed in with the editors personal inferences about what those 'facts' mean,,, as I said,, fluff Unverified? So your saying she they didn't buy their neighboring homes the same time the Rezko's did then Rezko sold half his property to Obama, making his property worthless? (He was\is one of the most corrupt political fixers in the Nations history). Michelle never served on non profits or hospital boards and took out rageous saleries? Wow. Every part of that video has been verified time and time again. What it failed to mention is that Saddam's illegal arms dealer financed the sale of both the homes. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/rezko_reality.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should read about Obama's father.He is a real work of art.He was married to 4 different women and had children by all of them.He skipped out and abandon 3 of his wives and their kids.Was a alcoholic who killed a man in a drunk driving accident.A second drunk driving accident cost him both of his legs. unfortunately, we dont get to choose our parents fortunately, he left OBamas life pretty early on,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever I read or watch the likes of the proposed 'youtube' for this thread, laced with a messy cocktail of confused, juvenile, 'half baked', calumnious and uninspired waste of incoherent synapses...
... I ALWAYS WONDER ABOUT 'MOTIVE' !!! I mean these poor propaganda butchers waste of lot time and money in these primitive character assassinations, typical of evangelical crusades. FOLLOWING THE MONEY TRAIL... is always a good start in helping to straighten out what would otherwise be nothing but a pile of 'ill digested table remains'. If you want to know why this BS doesn't make it to main stream news, not even the 'FOG fuse', just follow the FACTUAL trail at ... http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4677602 ... which very simply establishes the calumnious pyromaniacs' motives... ... obamatruth.org smear site = www.fairnessfoundation.org = www.hospitalvictims.org = REPUBLICANLEADERSHIP.ORG = medicalsavings.com... These 'GOONS'... responsible for the insipid attacks on anything 'democrat', ... stood to make $billions$ through medical insurance scams under just about any republican administration. Obama won't participate in their little boys' club scams, so they don't like anything Obama. Nothing new here, and obviously nothing true! |
|
|
|
|
