100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: French First Lady a Prostitute cuz she condemns stoning? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Some 2,000 years ago a woman was convicted to stoning for screwin' around outside of wedlock.
Oh, wait, it was just the other day. I thought Muslims only stoned folks in ancient times. Mah bad. 
Suppose Iran will stop its MSM from advertising their stonings now? 
Iran seeks to distance itself from newspaper's insult of France's first lady Associated Press Last update: August 31, 2010 - 4:15 AM TEHRAN, Iran - Iran has sought to distance itself from harsh remarks by a hard-line newspaper, which called France's first lady a "prostitute" for condemning the stoning sentence against an Iranian woman convicted of adultery. In comments Tuesday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast says "insulting" foreign dignitaries like Carla Bruni-Sarkozy is incorrect and not sanctioned by the government. The Kayhan daily first called Bruni-Sarkozy a "prostitute" Saturday. It repeated the criticism Tuesday. Like the Iranian woman, it said, she too deserves to die. Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, whose sentence has been temporarily suspended, could still face execution after a final review of her case. The case has prompted an international outcry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some 2,000 years ago a woman was convicted to stoning for screwin' around outside of wedlock. Oh, wait, it was just the other day. I thought Muslims only stoned folks in ancient times. Mah bad.
Suppose Iran will stop its MSM from advertising their stonings now?
Iran seeks to distance itself from newspaper's insult of France's first lady Associated Press Last update: August 31, 2010 - 4:15 AM TEHRAN, Iran - Iran has sought to distance itself from harsh remarks by a hard-line newspaper, which called France's first lady a "prostitute" for condemning the stoning sentence against an Iranian woman convicted of adultery. In comments Tuesday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast says "insulting" foreign dignitaries like Carla Bruni-Sarkozy is incorrect and not sanctioned by the government. The Kayhan daily first called Bruni-Sarkozy a "prostitute" Saturday. It repeated the criticism Tuesday. Like the Iranian woman, it said, she too deserves to die. Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, whose sentence has been temporarily suspended, could still face execution after a final review of her case. The case has prompted an international outcry. the older clerics in iran have way to much control. once they are gone, iran will get better |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess in Iranianspeak, calling someone a 'prostitute' when they denounce your barbaric Seventh-Century (BC) 'justice' and / or 'legal system' is more effective than (a) changing the system to reflect entry into the Twenty-first Century or, (b) joining the human race. I mean, there's this whole system out there that uses stuff like words 'n logic 'n language and symbolic reasoning and critical analysis and semantics 'n stuff ... it helps that 'communication and understanding' thing move along, y' know ... but that's obviously beyond the reach of the Seventh-Century (BC) mindset ... as is the word 'liar'. They could at least show they're a bit civilized by changing 'prostitute' to 'whore' ... besides, it has fewer letters, so they'd prolly even spell it right ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She's a Fox!
Hey Moe. I'd do 'er!   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Kings_Knight
on
Tue 08/31/10 08:10 AM
|
|
Dat's why all them horny ol' 'cleric' bastids are jealous ... they all want a li'l 'sump'm - sump'm' and know they can't git none o' dat ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Tue 08/31/10 08:15 AM
|
|
Dat's why all them horny ol' 'cleric' bastids are jealous ... they all want a li'l 'sump'm - sump'm' and know they can't git none o' dat ... She's about 40 years too old for 'em. 
They wouldn't know what to do with those lumps on her chest.
I do fear, after all the attention dies down, the gal will get her stoning. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dat's why all them horny ol' 'cleric' bastids are jealous ... they all want a li'l 'sump'm - sump'm' and know they can't git none o' dat ... She's about 40 years too old for 'em.
They wouldn't know what to do with those lumps on her chest.
thats ok, cause i sure do!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too
not like I havent heard people here wishing death upon others,,,or jumping to conclusions sane folks might question(like someone being muslim because they vacation during ramadan) looking at her history , she was a model and took nude photos,, that would be enough for some orthodox christians to call her a prostitute too...... its a nice distraction from the issue of stoning,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,, Doesn't sanction what? The stoning? They issued the order.
She's got class. Too bad we don't have a first lady like her. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Kings_Knight
on
Tue 08/31/10 08:49 AM
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 08/31/10 08:57 AM
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some 2,000 years ago a woman was convicted to stoning for screwin' around outside of wedlock. Oh, wait, it was just the other day. I thought Muslims only stoned folks in ancient times. Mah bad.
Suppose Iran will stop its MSM from advertising their stonings now?
Iran seeks to distance itself from newspaper's insult of France's first lady Associated Press Last update: August 31, 2010 - 4:15 AM TEHRAN, Iran - Iran has sought to distance itself from harsh remarks by a hard-line newspaper, which called France's first lady a "prostitute" for condemning the stoning sentence against an Iranian woman convicted of adultery. In comments Tuesday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast says "insulting" foreign dignitaries like Carla Bruni-Sarkozy is incorrect and not sanctioned by the government. The Kayhan daily first called Bruni-Sarkozy a "prostitute" Saturday. It repeated the criticism Tuesday. Like the Iranian woman, it said, she too deserves to die. Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, whose sentence has been temporarily suspended, could still face execution after a final review of her case. The case has prompted an international outcry. Not to mention she hasn't been seen or heard from since Friday........ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. exactly why I dont play the blame game,, of course someone always has PRIMARY responsibility(blame) , but rarely have others not played a part by their choices,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. exactly why I dont play the blame game,, of course someone always has PRIMARY responsibility(blame) , but rarely have others not played a part by their choices,,,, |
|
|
|
|
