100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Boycott Mexifornia | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
What gets me is that not ONE of the people who are screaming racism and racial profiling can point to ONE SENTENCE of that law that shows any of it. They just keep repeating the " talking points " and figure reading the law and making a coherent argument is completely unnecessary. here is the controversial sentence(s): B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO 24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, what would REASONABLE SUSPICION of non documentation be exactly? they have since amended it to be more specific and states that this SUSPICION cannot be based solely upon race,, and that request of proof is only permitted in the execution of some ACTUAL violation which is being investigated... if I , having attended mere state colleges, could see the potential for profiling in such vague wording,, its not odd to me that a Harvard Grad and constitutional law teacher may see it too... Perhaps. Too bad your favorite Harvard Grad never read it before he started running his mouth and siccing the lapdogs.I don't really believe he actually read it. After all...even his Attorney General didn't read it until just a couple of days ago.same thing he did with that cop case a while back. He made a knee jerk statement without knowing the facts. And do you think he's read it since then?? Or is he too busy chewing out the BP execs? But hey. Obama is beyond reproach, right?? Everything he does is perfectly excusable and if not....why they'll just skirt the issues and find ways to soften the edges from the things he does. It isn't possible to think he flat out screwed up. Even with that case I mentioned...he didn't actually do anything wrong. Right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What gets me is that not ONE of the people who are screaming racism and racial profiling can point to ONE SENTENCE of that law that shows any of it. They just keep repeating the " talking points " and figure reading the law and making a coherent argument is completely unnecessary. here is the controversial sentence(s): B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO 24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, what would REASONABLE SUSPICION of non documentation be exactly? they have since amended it to be more specific and states that this SUSPICION cannot be based solely upon race,, and that request of proof is only permitted in the execution of some ACTUAL violation which is being investigated... if I , having attended mere state colleges, could see the potential for profiling in such vague wording,, its not odd to me that a Harvard Grad and constitutional law teacher may see it too... Perhaps. Too bad your favorite Harvard Grad never read it before he started running his mouth and siccing the lapdogs.I don't really believe he actually read it. After all...even his Attorney General didn't read it until just a couple of days ago.same thing he did with that cop case a while back. He made a knee jerk statement without knowing the facts. And do you think he's read it since then?? Or is he too busy chewing out the BP execs? But hey. Obama is beyond reproach, right?? Everything he does is perfectly excusable and if not....why they'll just skirt the issues and find ways to soften the edges from the things he does. It isn't possible to think he flat out screwed up. Even with that case I mentioned...he didn't actually do anything wrong. Right? If it's anything having to do with getting the Illegals out, he's automatically against it. He's said he's Pro-Amnesty all along. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What gets me is that not ONE of the people who are screaming racism and racial profiling can point to ONE SENTENCE of that law that shows any of it. They just keep repeating the " talking points " and figure reading the law and making a coherent argument is completely unnecessary. here is the controversial sentence(s): B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO 24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, what would REASONABLE SUSPICION of non documentation be exactly? they have since amended it to be more specific and states that this SUSPICION cannot be based solely upon race,, and that request of proof is only permitted in the execution of some ACTUAL violation which is being investigated... if I , having attended mere state colleges, could see the potential for profiling in such vague wording,, its not odd to me that a Harvard Grad and constitutional law teacher may see it too... Perhaps. Too bad your favorite Harvard Grad never read it before he started running his mouth and siccing the lapdogs.I don't really believe he actually read it. After all...even his Attorney General didn't read it until just a couple of days ago.same thing he did with that cop case a while back. He made a knee jerk statement without knowing the facts. And do you think he's read it since then?? Or is he too busy chewing out the BP execs? But hey. Obama is beyond reproach, right?? Everything he does is perfectly excusable and if not....why they'll just skirt the issues and find ways to soften the edges from the things he does. It isn't possible to think he flat out screwed up. Even with that case I mentioned...he didn't actually do anything wrong. Right? wow,,actually, I would imagine he read it before commenting on it,,,,but I guess noone knows but HIM (and whomever may have been there if and when he read it) and no,, he isnt beyond making mistakes , he could have screwed up,, but on this I doubt it |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Lpdon
on
Sun 05/16/10 02:54 AM
|
|
What gets me is that not ONE of the people who are screaming racism and racial profiling can point to ONE SENTENCE of that law that shows any of it. They just keep repeating the " talking points " and figure reading the law and making a coherent argument is completely unnecessary. here is the controversial sentence(s): B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO 24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, what would REASONABLE SUSPICION of non documentation be exactly? they have since amended it to be more specific and states that this SUSPICION cannot be based solely upon race,, and that request of proof is only permitted in the execution of some ACTUAL violation which is being investigated... if I , having attended mere state colleges, could see the potential for profiling in such vague wording,, its not odd to me that a Harvard Grad and constitutional law teacher may see it too... Perhaps. Too bad your favorite Harvard Grad never read it before he started running his mouth and siccing the lapdogs.I don't really believe he actually read it. After all...even his Attorney General didn't read it until just a couple of days ago.same thing he did with that cop case a while back. He made a knee jerk statement without knowing the facts. And do you think he's read it since then?? Or is he too busy chewing out the BP execs? But hey. Obama is beyond reproach, right?? Everything he does is perfectly excusable and if not....why they'll just skirt the issues and find ways to soften the edges from the things he does. It isn't possible to think he flat out screwed up. Even with that case I mentioned...he didn't actually do anything wrong. Right? wow,,actually, I would imagine he read it before commenting on it,,,,but I guess noone knows but HIM (and whomever may have been there if and when he read it) and no,, he isnt beyond making mistakes , he could have screwed up,, but on this I doubt it He isn't beyond making mistakes?  Anyways. You Libbo's could of fooled us, the way you worship him and all. Hell I am still waiting to watch him turn my cup of water into a wine, feed my entire family with a small loaf of bread or even walk across my swimming pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What gets me is that not ONE of the people who are screaming racism and racial profiling can point to ONE SENTENCE of that law that shows any of it. They just keep repeating the " talking points " and figure reading the law and making a coherent argument is completely unnecessary. here is the controversial sentence(s): B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO 24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, what would REASONABLE SUSPICION of non documentation be exactly? they have since amended it to be more specific and states that this SUSPICION cannot be based solely upon race,, and that request of proof is only permitted in the execution of some ACTUAL violation which is being investigated... if I , having attended mere state colleges, could see the potential for profiling in such vague wording,, its not odd to me that a Harvard Grad and constitutional law teacher may see it too... Perhaps. Too bad your favorite Harvard Grad never read it before he started running his mouth and siccing the lapdogs.I don't really believe he actually read it. After all...even his Attorney General didn't read it until just a couple of days ago.same thing he did with that cop case a while back. He made a knee jerk statement without knowing the facts. And do you think he's read it since then?? Or is he too busy chewing out the BP execs? But hey. Obama is beyond reproach, right?? Everything he does is perfectly excusable and if not....why they'll just skirt the issues and find ways to soften the edges from the things he does. It isn't possible to think he flat out screwed up. Even with that case I mentioned...he didn't actually do anything wrong. Right? wow,,actually, I would imagine he read it before commenting on it,,,,but I guess noone knows but HIM (and whomever may have been there if and when he read it) and no,, he isnt beyond making mistakes , he could have screwed up,, but on this I doubt it He isn't beyond making mistakes? Anyways. You Libbo's could of fooled us, the way you worship him and all. Hell I am still waiting to watch him turn my cup of water into a wine, feed my entire family with a small loaf of bread or even walk across my swimming pool.
who worships him? I respect him and it makes me proud to watch the entire OBama family,,,but worship is a bit strong of a word to describe respect I respect his intelligence, his class, his diplomacy, and the way he and Michele have raised and structured their family I believe he relates to all classes and works for the better of the country, although I dont always approve of every decision he makes to do it,,,,,,, i believe he went through the scrutiny and paycut and intrusion on privacy for noble reasons because i dont see any other reason for it,,,,and I respect that brave and noble decision,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sun 05/16/10 06:41 AM
|
|
What gets me is that not ONE of the people who are screaming racism and racial profiling can point to ONE SENTENCE of that law that shows any of it. They just keep repeating the " talking points " and figure reading the law and making a coherent argument is completely unnecessary. here is the controversial sentence(s): B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO 24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, what would REASONABLE SUSPICION of non documentation be exactly? they have since amended it to be more specific and states that this SUSPICION cannot be based solely upon race,, and that request of proof is only permitted in the execution of some ACTUAL violation which is being investigated... if I , having attended mere state colleges, could see the potential for profiling in such vague wording,, its not odd to me that a Harvard Grad and constitutional law teacher may see it too... Perhaps. Too bad your favorite Harvard Grad never read it before he started running his mouth and siccing the lapdogs.I don't really believe he actually read it. After all...even his Attorney General didn't read it until just a couple of days ago.same thing he did with that cop case a while back. He made a knee jerk statement without knowing the facts. And do you think he's read it since then?? Or is he too busy chewing out the BP execs? But hey. Obama is beyond reproach, right?? Everything he does is perfectly excusable and if not....why they'll just skirt the issues and find ways to soften the edges from the things he does. It isn't possible to think he flat out screwed up. Even with that case I mentioned...he didn't actually do anything wrong. Right? wow,,actually, I would imagine he read it before commenting on it,,,,but I guess noone knows but HIM (and whomever may have been there if and when he read it) and no,, he isnt beyond making mistakes , he could have screwed up,, but on this I doubt it He isn't beyond making mistakes? Anyways. You Libbo's could of fooled us, the way you worship him and all. Hell I am still waiting to watch him turn my cup of water into a wine, feed my entire family with a small loaf of bread or even walk across my swimming pool.
who worships him? I respect him and it makes me proud to watch the entire OBama family,,,but worship is a bit strong of a word to describe respect I respect his intelligence, his class, his diplomacy, and the way he and Michele have raised and structured their family I believe he relates to all classes and works for the better of the country, although I dont always approve of every decision he makes to do it,,,,,,, i believe he went through the scrutiny and paycut and intrusion on privacy for noble reasons because i dont see any other reason for it,,,,and I respect that brave and noble decision,,, I see one great big beni. which, if it were up to me, would cease to exist. After he's done screwin' up this perfectly good nation, he gets 24/7 body guards, free 100% health care, (and not the BS plan he got passed for us), and welfare-for-life. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What gets me is that not ONE of the people who are screaming racism and racial profiling can point to ONE SENTENCE of that law that shows any of it. They just keep repeating the " talking points " and figure reading the law and making a coherent argument is completely unnecessary. here is the controversial sentence(s): B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW 22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO 24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, what would REASONABLE SUSPICION of non documentation be exactly? they have since amended it to be more specific and states that this SUSPICION cannot be based solely upon race,, and that request of proof is only permitted in the execution of some ACTUAL violation which is being investigated... if I , having attended mere state colleges, could see the potential for profiling in such vague wording,, its not odd to me that a Harvard Grad and constitutional law teacher may see it too... Perhaps. Too bad your favorite Harvard Grad never read it before he started running his mouth and siccing the lapdogs.I don't really believe he actually read it. After all...even his Attorney General didn't read it until just a couple of days ago.same thing he did with that cop case a while back. He made a knee jerk statement without knowing the facts. And do you think he's read it since then?? Or is he too busy chewing out the BP execs? But hey. Obama is beyond reproach, right?? Everything he does is perfectly excusable and if not....why they'll just skirt the issues and find ways to soften the edges from the things he does. It isn't possible to think he flat out screwed up. Even with that case I mentioned...he didn't actually do anything wrong. Right? wow,,actually, I would imagine he read it before commenting on it,,,,but I guess noone knows but HIM (and whomever may have been there if and when he read it) and no,, he isnt beyond making mistakes , he could have screwed up,, but on this I doubt it He isn't beyond making mistakes? Anyways. You Libbo's could of fooled us, the way you worship him and all. Hell I am still waiting to watch him turn my cup of water into a wine, feed my entire family with a small loaf of bread or even walk across my swimming pool.
who worships him? I respect him and it makes me proud to watch the entire OBama family,,,but worship is a bit strong of a word to describe respect I respect his intelligence, his class, his diplomacy, and the way he and Michele have raised and structured their family I believe he relates to all classes and works for the better of the country, although I dont always approve of every decision he makes to do it,,,,,,, i believe he went through the scrutiny and paycut and intrusion on privacy for noble reasons because i dont see any other reason for it,,,,and I respect that brave and noble decision,,, I see one great big beni. which, if it were up to me, would cease to exist. After he's done screwin' up this perfectly good nation, he gets 24/7 body guards, free 100% health care, (and not the BS plan he got passed for us), and welfare-for-life.
respectively,, we both have the rights to our own perceptions and opinions,,, |
|
|
|
|
