Topic: Who pulls the strings?. | |
---|---|
China says no...? To Australians in Australia, about who to have tea
with? From BBC news... Last Updated: Wednesday, 13 June 2007, 10:53 GMT 11:53 UK Australia backs Dalai Lama visit By Phil Mercer BBC News, Sydney Dalai Lama in Melbourne The Dalai Lama has been in exile from Tibet since 1959 Australia has brushed off criticism from China over a visit by the exiled Tibetan Buddhist leader the Dalai Lama. Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said Beijing should respect Australia's democratic system. He said the Dalai Lama would always be welcome in Australia, where he was regarded as a religious figure and not a politician. On Tuesday, China warned Australia that the visit could damage relations between the two countries. China is Australia's biggest trading partner, and Prime Minister John Howard has been keen to stress that his government acknowledges Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. But China believes that its strong views on this very sensitive issue have been ignored by the Australians. A spokesman in Beijing said the Dalai Lama was not simply a religious figurehead, but a political exile who was engaging in separatism and the sabotage of Chinese unity. Controversial meetings China is likely to feel even more aggrieved later this week when Mr Howard is scheduled to meet the 71-year-old monk. The Dalai Lama has already held discussions with a group of parliamentarians in Canberra and the leader of the federal opposition, Kevin Rudd. The spiritual leader has been urging countries like Australia to use its economic muscle to pressure Beijing on human rights. Thousands of Australians have attended events and rallies during his tour. A large crowd gathered to hear him talk about the environment at a zoo in Queensland, which is run by the widow of the crocodile hunter, Steve Irwin, who died last year and had strong ties to a local Buddhist monastery. The Dalai Lama, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, went into exile in 1959 after a failed uprising against Communist rule in Tibet. |
|
|
|
Dalai Lama warns against China containment
Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:52 PM IST148 By Rob Taylor CANBERRA (Reuters) - The Dalai Lama warned major nations on Tuesday not to try to contain China's economic and military rise, but urged countries like Australia to use their trading clout to pressure Beijing on human rights. The exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, speaking in Canberra, said he shared concerns about growing strategic and trade ties between the United States, India, Japan and Australia, which Beijing has interpreted as moves towards encirclement. "It is absolutely wrong to isolate China and also contain China. It's wrong, morally also wrong," the Dalai Lama told the Australian National Press Club. "China must be brought into the mainstream of the world community, and now fortunately China themselves want to join the world community. Most welcome. Very good. "However ... while you are making good relations, genuine friendship with China, certain principles such as human rights and also democracy, rule of law, free press, these things you should stand firm. That means you are a true friend of China." The United States, Japan and Australia have said their growing defence ties are not aimed at containing China, even though India last month joined the three in security talks. Australian Prime Minister John Howard and pro-China opposition leader Kevin Rudd said on Tuesday they would ignore pressure from Beijing's Canberra embassy not to meet the Tibetan Buddhist leader, despite vague warnings of repercussions. After weeks of diary searching Howard found he could make time to meet the visitor on Friday in Sydney. Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd, a Mandarin-speaking former diplomat, went back on an earlier refusal and met him on Tuesday at a Canberra hotel. The Australia Tibet Council urged Rudd, who is riding high in the polls, to support greater autonomy for Tibet if he won power in a general election later this year. "I would like Kevin Rudd to say ... 'we will use whatever influence we have to raise the issue of Tibet with the Chinese'," chairman George Farley told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio. China has overtaken Japan as Australia's biggest trading partner, although Canberra's strategic interests remain closely allied with those of Washington. Australia's statistics office said in May that the nation's trade with China had hit A$52.7 billion ($44.3 billion) in the year to March, slightly surpassing bilateral exchanges with Japan as energy-hungry China's demand for Australian resources continued. The Dalai Lama, whom Beijing considers a separatist, admitted China's fast-growing world influence was hampering his access to some world leaders to press demands for greater autonomy, not independence, for his predominantly Buddhist homeland. But support for an autonomous Tibet was growing in the United States and some small European nations, he said, although some nations were understandably reluctant to cross China. "I think the more serious concern, I think the public sympathy, public concern, it seems like it's increasing," the Dalai Lama said, adding that he was unconcerned if he did not secure a meeting with Howard. "In my mind it's not that serious, but in their mind it seems very, very serious," he said. |
|
|
|
Thanks Lee! A post about something other than America! You are soooooo
hot!!!! |
|
|
|
Hi,Lee!
Interesting. The Dalai Lama comes to the US fairly often and I have not heard any mention of a Chinese protest to the US. I wonder if it doesn't happen, or the media does not report it. How popular has the Dalai Lama become in Australia? Is there a Tibetan Buddhist movement? Local monasteries/nunneries? Oceans |
|
|
|
Thanks Steve,
from ABC Radio.. Last Updated 13/06/2007, 21:29:36 Australia's Foreign Minister, Alexander Downer, says the country's relationship with China won't be impacted by the visit by Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama. Ben Worsley reports the argument erupts every time the Dalai Lama visits. China is angry the Prime Minister's meeting the Dalai Lama on Friday. It's warned its relationship with Australia could be harmed and it wants future visits banned. Alexander Downer says that's not going to happen. He's says the visit isn't political. "The Dalai Lama is not using Australia as a platform to argue for an independent Tibet." Mr Downer says Australia's relationship with China is strong and based on mutual benefit. |
|
|
|
Hi,Lee!
Interesting. The Dalai Lama comes to the US fairly often and I have not heard any mention of a Chinese protest to the US. I wonder if it doesn't happen, or the media does not report it. How popular has the Dalai Lama become in Australia? Is there a Tibetan Buddhist movement? Local monasteries/nunneries? Oceans |
|
|
|
Yes there are a number of tibetan buddhist monasteries, (retreats)
throughout Australia, Oceans, and the one referred to, in the second post, close to Australia Zoo, is called Chenrezig. |
|
|
|
Oooops...my server is a bit cranky -- big storm moving through.
|
|
|
|
I can understand the Dalai Lama, not finding it that important to speak
with John Howard the Australian Prime Minister, as we have a Federal election later this year... And as with other parts of the world, support for the war in Iraq has waned dramatically, and this Prime Minister placed us in it... (I don't expect him to be re-elected, and perhaps, pure conjecture here, neither does the Dalai Lama) |
|
|
|
I know it is simplistic but I make no apologies. Freedom of religion. It
does make the news when the Dalai Lama visits. Not sure why the Chinese don't complain other than the probability that nobody here would care if they did. |
|
|
|
Let the Dali Lama come here as a political and religious figure, too
many things in my house say 'made in _______ (not America' |
|
|
|
i am just learrning the computer so if you dont hear from me for a few
days dont be alarmed its just my brain hasnt kicked in yet. i would like to say hello to all that has visited my site and thank you for leaving me with your mail |
|
|
|
Thank you Lee....
The only comment that I have to make...is that americans that do not believe in American policy...there are just as many chinese ...if not more...that do not believe in the policy of the Chinese government....and I as an American.....care Again...thank you Lee |
|
|
|
Oh!! JJ, i hope this thread doesn't imply I am lumping the people, the
population of China, in with the politics...it is not my intent. I just found it very interesting that a trade partner can attempt to dictate their political agendas to other countries... It seems to be the way, of recent years...and I wonder how free we really are, whose government makes the decisions for the country we live in? Hence, the who pulls the strings question.. |
|
|
|
Not at all Lee...I was also posting to another that had made a
comment...I felt no negativity from you...goodness sakes...I appreciate the thread... |
|
|
|
JJ, my comment was aimed at the Chinese government, not its people.
Without going into it in depth, government bad, people good. |
|
|
|
Thank you Zap...appreciate the clarification...I must have taken it
wrong |
|
|
|
But I would like to make a comment as I have a little first hand
knowledge here...that although the citizens may not like the government policies, they also have little knowledge of the world around them and how their country is percieved. The vast majority of the news very sensored here...I myself get very little news of the outside world as the Great Firewall of china exists...I get more knowlege here in these threads than anywhere... |
|
|
|
While I have no malice for the Chinese or any other peoples for that
matter, I directed a comment toward a government and not its people. Maybe others (you out there Fred? ) are commenting on the American government and we are mis....... aw crap! I can't seem to explain my thoughts. Too tired. Hope someone can smell what I'm stepping in and run with it. |
|
|
|
Hey Zap...
Perhaps one day all the 'people' around the world will tell there goverments to toe the line. People have far more power than a government does. Ever seen a flock of birds drive of a falcon? That falcon may have all the weapons and the predetors instinct but he ain't no match for a simple flock of sparrows. |
|
|