Topic: can anybody prove to me a GOD?? | |
---|---|
I don't know why I'm surprised but I can't believe this is still going lol
No one can prove it either way, this is a no win debate as there is no 100% absolute proof either way. I figure live life and enjoy it, be kind and caring, regardless of being religious or nonreligious. Let life takes it course and at the end of the road, you will have your proof. |
|
|
|
the original poster set up a unique circumstance ...he asked for proof of God beyond what's written in the bible or other religious scriptures ...
a book can give any character an existence such as "Spiderman" but is there any proof that Spiderman exist beyond the book without using the comic book as a reference this thread only points out that all anyone think they know about God is not because of the grace of God but because of what they read in a book ..in other words ..."this I know for the bible tells me so" |
|
|
|
the original poster set up a unique circumstance ...he asked for proof of God beyond what's written in the bible or other religious scriptures ... a book can give any character an existence such as "Spiderman" but is there any proof that Spiderman exist beyond the book without using the comic book as a reference this thread only points out that all anyone think they know about God is not because of the grace of God but because of what they read in a book ..in other words ..."this I know for the bible tells me so" The responding poster set up a unique circumstance. He is shown proof that is NOT from the Bible or religious scriptures... Sources include: Respected scholars' works, biographies of rulers, court documents and even written works from the detracters of Christ and God. Historical documents can give proof of a character's existense WITHOUT using scriptures. This poster only uses circular logic, ad hominem attacks, fallacies, lies and a children's song as a rebutal while refusing to read or acknowledge the evidence shown and them claiming none was presented. |
|
|
|
the original poster set up a unique circumstance ...he asked for proof of God beyond what's written in the bible or other religious scriptures ... a book can give any character an existence such as "Spiderman" but is there any proof that Spiderman exist beyond the book without using the comic book as a reference this thread only points out that all anyone think they know about God is not because of the grace of God but because of what they read in a book ..in other words ..."this I know for the bible tells me so" The responding poster set up a unique circumstance. He is shown proof that is NOT from the Bible or religious scriptures... Sources include: Respected scholars' works, biographies of rulers, court documents and even written works from the detracters of Christ and God. Historical documents can give proof of a character's existense WITHOUT using scriptures. This poster only uses circular logic, ad hominem attacks, fallacies, lies and a children's song as a rebutal while refusing to read or acknowledge the evidence shown and them claiming none was presented. Peter_Pan ...court documents? ...did someone take God to court....and did he show up? ...or did they claim since he is omnipresent that he was in the court somewhere .... don't you have any direct evidence ...for example.....have you personally heard voices that you think is God or the holy ghost talking to you |
|
|
|
the original poster set up a unique circumstance ...he asked for proof of God beyond what's written in the bible or other religious scriptures ... a book can give any character an existence such as "Spiderman" but is there any proof that Spiderman exist beyond the book without using the comic book as a reference this thread only points out that all anyone think they know about God is not because of the grace of God but because of what they read in a book ..in other words ..."this I know for the bible tells me so" The responding poster set up a unique circumstance. He is shown proof that is NOT from the Bible or religious scriptures... Sources include: Respected scholars' works, biographies of rulers, court documents and even written works from the detracters of Christ and God. Historical documents can give proof of a character's existense WITHOUT using scriptures. This poster only uses circular logic, ad hominem attacks, fallacies, lies and a children's song as a rebutal while refusing to read or acknowledge the evidence shown and them claiming none was presented. Peter_Pan ...court documents? ...did someone take God to court....and did he show up? ...or did they claim since he is omnipresent that he was in the court somewhere .... don't you have any direct evidence ...for example.....have you personally heard voices that you think is God or the holy ghost talking to you Hmmm, how do I put this.... I told you I love merry-go-rounds... |
|
|
|
Edited by
funches
on
Tue 12/15/09 07:35 AM
|
|
don't you have any direct evidence ...for example.....have you personally heard voices that you think is God or the holy ghost talking to you Hmmm, how do I put this.... is it so hard to just say yes or no ..... the religious will sometimes make claims to each other that God have spoke to them.......the bible is even written by those that have claim God spoke to them .... Peter_Pan.....this is why I asked you if you heard voices that you believe was God talking to you ...are you saying that everyone that claim that God has talked to them are lying ....oops I meant hallucinating |
|
|
|
Edited by
Peter_Pan69
on
Tue 12/15/09 07:58 AM
|
|
is it so hard to just say yes or no ..... the religious will sometimes make claims to each other that God have spoke to them.......the bible is even written by those that have claim God spoke to them .... Peter_Pan.....this is why I asked you if you heard voices that you believe was God talking to you ...are you saying that everyone that claim that God has talked to them are lying ....oops I meant hallucinating If you want to debate, you must respond... If you don't repond, neither will I. Now, you have been shown evidence, now go read it and IF you can convince me you've read it, I'll answer one question from you. Then you one from me and so on... If you lie or attack anyone, you'll get the standard response from me. P.S. while you reading the evidence, check out this site too: http://www.logicalfallacies.info/ That should explain why I don't really bother debating you. |
|
|
|
If you want to debate, you must respond... Peter_Pan ...reading links to webpages is not a debate .....it's googling ....clearly you must have read that webpage..is the webpage so beyond your comprehension that it's impossible for you to condense it using your own thoughts and present the proof here without resorting to "google cut and paste" why do you need others to provide proof for you of God ...is that an indication that you never met God and/or do not have God in your heart or heard the voices of God that you have to run to others for proof.....and that is why you have no proof beyond faith |
|
|
|
If you want to debate, you must respond... Peter_Pan ...reading links to webpages is not a debate .....it's googling ....clearly you must have read that webpage..is the webpage so beyond your comprehension that it's impossible for you to condense it using your own thoughts and present the proof here without resorting to "google cut and paste" why do you need others to provide proof for you of God ...is that an indication that you never met God and/or do not have God in your heart or heard the voices of God that you have to run to others for proof.....and that is why you have no proof beyond faith |
|
|
|
If you want to debate, you must respond... Peter_Pan ...reading links to webpages is not a debate .....it's googling ....clearly you must have read that webpage..is the webpage so beyond your comprehension that it's impossible for you to condense it using your own thoughts and present the proof here without resorting to "google cut and paste" why do you need others to provide proof for you of God ...is that an indication that you never met God and/or do not have God in your heart or heard the voices of God that you have to run to others for proof.....and that is why you have no proof beyond faith I guess asking you if you personally have any dealing with God would be funny ....perhaps I should have said Satan |
|
|
|
Edited by
PyroDeerHunter
on
Wed 12/23/09 01:58 AM
|
|
No matter what anyone will say or show, people like this will NEVER believe. It's pretty much a waste of time to "debate" with people like that. What you should do is study up on the belief so you don't look ill informed if you ever get into a religious debate.
Just to clarify, THERE IS NO PROOF OR DISPROOF OF GOD'S EXISTENCE. Reason being you believe by FAITH. If you have questions, want to maturely debate, etc, message me. I don't push my beliefs onto people. Have the respect to do the same. |
|
|
|
nobody knows, nobody can prove it or disprove it, theres no evidence that there is or isnt one,its as simple as that.
|
|
|
|
the debate is not about disproving God....it simply ask if there is anyone that has any undisputable proof of God's existence beyond what they read in the bible ....
it's a question design to pop people back into reality and make them realize that the only answer that can be given is ....no ... |
|
|
|
this thread hasn't died yet?
|
|
|
|
this thread hasn't died yet? it was resurrected .. |
|
|
|
without quoting scripture or the bible, ++ I am serious>, ty ted No, no more than anyone here can prove to you a Christopher Columbus or a MichaelAngelo, the work lives on but WHO really did it can never be proven. There are writings, but we cant PROVE who wrote them as we were not there. We can only go by what is documented and our faith that it is accurate. |
|
|
|
I still think it all boils down to whether or not a disbeliever assumes or takes on faith that matter appeared out of nothing.
If that's their stance, then they MUST believe in magic or miracles.... which leads us back to "God"... |
|
|
|
without quoting scripture or the bible, ++ I am serious>, ty ted No, no more than anyone here can prove to you a Christopher Columbus or a MichaelAngelo, the work lives on but WHO really did it can never be proven. There are writings, but we cant PROVE who wrote them as we were not there. We can only go by what is documented and our faith that it is accurate. Christopher Columbus and MichaelAngelo were humans and there is no dispute if humans existed the debate is about providing proof of an existence of a God also some claim that what is documented in the bible consist of metaphors and parables and claiming faith can not make a metaphor or a parable accurate this is why the thread asks for proof beyond the bible...clearly if God is supposedly omnipresent this task should be simple |
|
|
|
without quoting scripture or the bible, ++ I am serious>, ty ted No, no more than anyone here can prove to you a Christopher Columbus or a MichaelAngelo, the work lives on but WHO really did it can never be proven. There are writings, but we cant PROVE who wrote them as we were not there. We can only go by what is documented and our faith that it is accurate. Christopher Columbus and MichaelAngelo were humans and there is no dispute if humans existed the debate is about providing proof of an existence of a God also some claim that what is documented in the bible consist of metaphors and parables and claiming faith can not make a metaphor or a parable accurate this is why the thread asks for proof beyond the bible...clearly if God is supposedly omnipresent this task should be simple humans exist, the question was about whether a SPECIFICALLY named person existed and whether their specific existence can be proven. Some force existed that created the earth and life, the SPECIFIC source or name for that source can , likewise, not be PROVEN by anyone on this thread either. We believe the documents and the theories of our choice. |
|
|
|
without quoting scripture or the bible, ++ I am serious>, ty ted No, no more than anyone here can prove to you a Christopher Columbus or a MichaelAngelo, the work lives on but WHO really did it can never be proven. There are writings, but we cant PROVE who wrote them as we were not there. We can only go by what is documented and our faith that it is accurate. Christopher Columbus and MichaelAngelo were humans and there is no dispute if humans existed the debate is about providing proof of an existence of a God also some claim that what is documented in the bible consist of metaphors and parables and claiming faith can not make a metaphor or a parable accurate this is why the thread asks for proof beyond the bible...clearly if God is supposedly omnipresent this task should be simple humans exist, the question was about whether a SPECIFICALLY named person existed and whether their specific existence can be proven. Some force existed that created the earth and life, the SPECIFIC source or name for that source can , likewise, not be PROVEN by anyone on this thread either. We believe the documents and the theories of our choice. in others words you have no proof of the existence of a God beyond what you read in the bible |
|
|