Previous 1 3
Topic: U.S. attempting to regulate the Internet
Atlantis75's photo
Sat 10/24/09 11:59 AM
I know, I know, someone will come and comment that "youtube is not a reliable source but anyway

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy_Gxtvfsnk


Here is related:

New rules on Net neutrality could mean loss of jobs

In recent months, The Star has reported extensively on the down economy and resulting job losses. We had hoped that the worst days were behind us, but now the Federal Communications Commission is considering putting new regulations on the Internet that could kill jobs in Indiana and across the country.

The FCC is debating an issue this month that many people call Net neutrality, and it is something that we all need to watch closely.


Ultimately, the FCC wants to regulate the Internet and we are concerned that the agency's actions could bring new investment in broadband networks to a halt. When the telecom companies are investing, it means more work for skilled labor. And even during this down economy, the telecom companies have been investing billions of dollars in new infrastructure. That's good news for the Communications Workers of America because investment in wired and wireless broadband means jobs.

We think that Net neutrality is a bad idea. The Internet is working fine. Telecom companies are investing and the CWA is building the networks that are the future of the Internet. New regulations are not needed.

Tim Strong

President, CWA Local 4900

http://www.indystar.com/article/20091024/OPINION01/910240325/1002/OPINION/New+rules+on+Net+neutrality+could+mean+loss+of+jobs




boredinaz06's photo
Sat 10/24/09 12:05 PM


Fox reported on this a few weeks ago! Another reason obama will be an epic failure in 2012.

prisoner's photo
Sat 10/24/09 12:14 PM
I am no fan of technology and I realize there are plenty of loons online,but Government regulation of The Internet is too 'Big Brother' for me. be seeing you

Italy0219's photo
Sat 10/24/09 12:39 PM
Yeah, somehow "they" will ruin it, they gotta have there sticky fingers in everything, and F it up, just for the greed.....nothing is sacred...

jrbogie's photo
Sat 10/24/09 01:51 PM
hahahaa. folks, the internet is already regulated. just post child pornography and see if you aren't quickly regulated off to jail. laugh

MirrorMirror's photo
Sat 10/24/09 02:33 PM

hahahaa. folks, the internet is already regulated. just post child pornography and see if you aren't quickly regulated off to jail. laugh
laugh That's right:thumbsup:

MirrorMirror's photo
Sat 10/24/09 02:39 PM
:smile: The cops regulate the internet right now:smile:

Dragoness's photo
Sat 10/24/09 02:41 PM

hahahaa. folks, the internet is already regulated. just post child pornography and see if you aren't quickly regulated off to jail. laugh


Bush started it as part of his "homeland security" thing also. So it has been around since at least 2001.

prisoner's photo
Sat 10/24/09 02:46 PM
Child porn is against The Law,and anyone who deals in it should be sent to jail. What worries me,Government watching over 'political speech'. That could get very 'Big Brother'. be seeing you

MirrorMirror's photo
Sat 10/24/09 02:48 PM
Edited by MirrorMirror on Sat 10/24/09 02:55 PM
:smile: How do you think the cops catch child pornogrphers and pedo's?:smile: IT'S REGULATED ALREADY!slaphead

prisoner's photo
Sat 10/24/09 02:58 PM

:smile: How do you think the cops catch child pornogrphers and pedo's?:smile: IT'S REGULATED ALREADY!laugh
indifferent I understand that,and I have no problem with law enforcement going after scum. What worries me is the regulating of valid ideas (child porn has no validity,it's wrong.). For instance,if I were to post that I think the Obama Administration is corrupt and Fox News is the only media reporting it. If the Government had the right to delete that post,that would be wrong. Please don't compare child porn with legitimate political free speech. be seeing you

Atlantis75's photo
Sat 10/24/09 03:00 PM

:smile: How do you think the cops catch child pornogrphers and pedo's?:smile: IT'S REGULATED ALREADY!slaphead


That's not regulation, that's utilization of the net.

Regulation is an entirely different idea.

MirrorMirror's photo
Sat 10/24/09 03:33 PM


:smile: How do you think the cops catch child pornogrphers and pedo's?:smile: IT'S REGULATED ALREADY!laugh
indifferent I understand that,and I have no problem with law enforcement going after scum. What worries me is the regulating of valid ideas (child porn has no validity,it's wrong.). For instance,if I were to post that I think the Obama Administration is corrupt and Fox News is the only media reporting it. If the Government had the right to delete that post,that would be wrong. Please don't compare child porn with legitimate political free speech. be seeing you
:smile: Law Enforcement is carried out by the goverment:smile:

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/24/09 03:48 PM
Oh no, RULES!!! how will we and the internet survive? (rolls eyes)

There is not any information as to what the regulation will involve but people hear the word and all hell breaks loose. Interesting. The Fcc regulates the airwaves and we still have as much crap as ever on the idiot box. Im sure it wont affect what crap will be on the internet. And Im pretty sure OBama isnt remotely involved in whatever is being considered right now by the FCC. He is frying bigger fish.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 10/24/09 04:42 PM

Oh no, RULES!!! how will we and the internet survive? (rolls eyes)

There is not any information as to what the regulation will involve but people hear the word and all hell breaks loose. Interesting. The Fcc regulates the airwaves and we still have as much crap as ever on the idiot box. Im sure it wont affect what crap will be on the internet.


Actually what I see is a bigger crackdown on free speech over the web coming. Like for example, how often do you see a site like youtube remove content that is not for copyright related reasons? It happens more often then you may think. I'd be very worried about something like this, because the more free speech is taken away, the less control we have in getting messages out there, and the more control the mainstream media has in just what is shown and what is hidden.

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/24/09 04:49 PM


Oh no, RULES!!! how will we and the internet survive? (rolls eyes)

There is not any information as to what the regulation will involve but people hear the word and all hell breaks loose. Interesting. The Fcc regulates the airwaves and we still have as much crap as ever on the idiot box. Im sure it wont affect what crap will be on the internet.


Actually what I see is a bigger crackdown on free speech over the web coming. Like for example, how often do you see a site like youtube remove content that is not for copyright related reasons? It happens more often then you may think. I'd be very worried about something like this, because the more free speech is taken away, the less control we have in getting messages out there, and the more control the mainstream media has in just what is shown and what is hidden.



I respect that. I just dont think it will change much. FCC still oversees television and it hasnt changed much, if anything its less strict. As for what networks and websites choose to include or not include, the dollar speaks. They have a right to make a profit and when they see that profit threatened by words or actions that could cost them consumers,, they have every right to decide to pull it.

MirrorMirror's photo
Sat 10/24/09 04:59 PM
:smile: For example,there was a medical emergency such as a widespread viral outbreak,and a group of people take it upon themselves to perpetrate a hoax rumor that the vaccine for the viral outbreak was dangerous and the cause of the illness.:smile:Many thousands of people belive this hoax rumor and avoid the vaccination,thereby endangering many more lives.:smile:The virus spreads throughout society because so many people did not recieve the vaccination because of the hoax rumor and millions of innocent children and elderly people lose their lives for no reason.:smile:Should the perpetrators of the hoax rumor be identified and prosecuted for the deaths?:smile:I think so.:smile:

Kleisto's photo
Sat 10/24/09 05:06 PM
Edited by Kleisto on Sat 10/24/09 05:07 PM



Oh no, RULES!!! how will we and the internet survive? (rolls eyes)

There is not any information as to what the regulation will involve but people hear the word and all hell breaks loose. Interesting. The Fcc regulates the airwaves and we still have as much crap as ever on the idiot box. Im sure it wont affect what crap will be on the internet.


Actually what I see is a bigger crackdown on free speech over the web coming. Like for example, how often do you see a site like youtube remove content that is not for copyright related reasons? It happens more often then you may think. I'd be very worried about something like this, because the more free speech is taken away, the less control we have in getting messages out there, and the more control the mainstream media has in just what is shown and what is hidden.



I respect that. I just dont think it will change much. FCC still oversees television and it hasnt changed much, if anything its less strict. As for what networks and websites choose to include or not include, the dollar speaks. They have a right to make a profit and when they see that profit threatened by words or actions that could cost them consumers,, they have every right to decide to pull it.


Perhaps but in doing so don't they infringe on our constitutional rights to free speech? It just seems very Orwellian you know? Like if you believe this, this or this, you're a threat to them and must be taken care of.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 10/24/09 05:08 PM

:smile: For example,there was a medical emergency such as a widespread viral outbreak,and a group of people take it upon themselves to perpetrate a hoax rumor that the vaccine for the viral outbreak was dangerous and the cause of the illness.:smile:Many thousands of people belive this hoax rumor and avoid the vaccination,thereby endangering many more lives.:smile:The virus spreads throughout society because so many people did not recieve the vaccination because of the hoax rumor and millions of innocent children and elderly people lose their lives for no reason.:smile:Should the perpetrators of the hoax rumor be identified and prosecuted for the deaths?:smile:I think so.:smile:


And what if those people are right? What then?

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/24/09 05:09 PM
Yeah, free speech is always a touchy subject. I think it is sad people NEED to have their speech regulated because of their willingness to use words to put others in harms way.

Previous 1 3