Topic: Is faith stronger than religion? | |
---|---|
Faith is a belief in something w/o proof. Period. You can dress it up any way you want, make polite poetic prose about it, it's still a belief in something w/o proof. If you have proof, it's not faith. By definition. I have no understanding why anyone would have faith in anything. It seems so completely intellectually lazy, I just cannot comprehend why any self-aware entity would indulge in this. You can believe in something without proof without it being faith. I believe that if I do not commit a crime then I will not go to jail. Even though there is ample evidence against this, I still believe it. However, to believe in something that cannot be proven -- that seems to be the place where faith resides. Maybe I am just splitting hairs but it works for me. The big one of course is God. God is supposed to be beyond human comprehension and transcends the physical cosmos. Since It is outside our realm of perception the rules of evidence and proof fall away. Since there is no way to prove that God exists and no way to prove that God does not exist, you must rely on faith. But you ask why any self-aware entity would indulge in this... it is because we are self-aware. We are aware of who we are, our impending deaths and we try to make sense of our place in the universe. Faith offers comfort, perspective and a measure of control. I think it is a bit disingenuous to characterize faith as being intellectually lazy. Some of the greatest intellects the world has ever known have had a strong sense of faith. Think about it this way: where is your mind? For centuries that question has caused philosophers to develop all sorts of strange answers. But in some way, shape or form the organic part of you fashions a self-aware sentience that is part of you. But is it indivisible? Can a sentience exist outside of its organic framework? I don't know. I don't know how to prove it or disprove it. In essence, the answer of that question is beyond my ability to "know". In fact, I have resigned myself that I will never know, so instead... I believe. I have faith that no matter what the energy is within me that classifies me as being alive, when I die that energy will dissipate. Maybe quickly, maybe slowly. But regardless, the separation of material corpus and energy destroys my sentience. That separation ends my identity. That is the best I can do with what I have. I have no proof. I doubt I will ever have proof. But I need an answer so that I may choose how to live my life, so I give myself an answer. (wow, that was a bit of a ramble... my apologies) |
|
|
|
Faith is a belief in something w/o proof. Period. You can dress it up any way you want, make polite poetic prose about it, it's still a belief in something w/o proof. If you have proof, it's not faith. By definition. I have no understanding why anyone would have faith in anything. It seems so completely intellectually lazy, I just cannot comprehend why any self-aware entity would indulge in this. You can believe in something without proof without it being faith. I believe that if I do not commit a crime then I will not go to jail. Even though there is ample evidence against this, I still believe it. However, to believe in something that cannot be proven -- that seems to be the place where faith resides. Maybe I am just splitting hairs but it works for me. The big one of course is God. God is supposed to be beyond human comprehension and transcends the physical cosmos. Since It is outside our realm of perception the rules of evidence and proof fall away. Since there is no way to prove that God exists and no way to prove that God does not exist, you must rely on faith. But you ask why any self-aware entity would indulge in this... it is because we are self-aware. We are aware of who we are, our impending deaths and we try to make sense of our place in the universe. Faith offers comfort, perspective and a measure of control. I think it is a bit disingenuous to characterize faith as being intellectually lazy. Some of the greatest intellects the world has ever known have had a strong sense of faith. Think about it this way: where is your mind? For centuries that question has caused philosophers to develop all sorts of strange answers. But in some way, shape or form the organic part of you fashions a self-aware sentience that is part of you. But is it indivisible? Can a sentience exist outside of its organic framework? I don't know. I don't know how to prove it or disprove it. In essence, the answer of that question is beyond my ability to "know". In fact, I have resigned myself that I will never know, so instead... I believe. I have faith that no matter what the energy is within me that classifies me as being alive, when I die that energy will dissipate. Maybe quickly, maybe slowly. But regardless, the separation of material corpus and energy destroys my sentience. That separation ends my identity. That is the best I can do with what I have. I have no proof. I doubt I will ever have proof. But I need an answer so that I may choose how to live my life, so I give myself an answer. (wow, that was a bit of a ramble... my apologies) No worries... Meet you on the other side when that day comes... have a non material beer and such... and discuss proof... Or knowledge gained by journey. |
|
|
|
Faith is a belief in something w/o proof. Period. You can dress it up any way you want, make polite poetic prose about it, it's still a belief in something w/o proof. If you have proof, it's not faith. By definition. I have no understanding why anyone would have faith in anything. It seems so completely intellectually lazy, I just cannot comprehend why any self-aware entity would indulge in this. You can believe in something without proof without it being faith. uh...no you can't. I think you're confusing "hope" and "wish" with reality. I believe that if I do not commit a crime then I will not go to jail. Even though there is ample evidence against this, I still believe it. So.....you believe there is ample evidence that you will go to jail w/o commiting a crime and yet you believe that you won't? Anybody get this???? Perhaps in your haste to respond you left a few words out 'cause what you wrote makes no sense... However, to believe in something that cannot be proven -- that seems to be the place where faith resides. Maybe I am just splitting hairs but it works for me. uh....that IS what I wrote... The big one of course is God. God is supposed to be beyond human comprehension and transcends the physical cosmos. Since It is outside our realm of perception the rules of evidence and proof fall away. Since there is no way to prove that God exists and no way to prove that God does not exist, you must rely on faith. "You must rely on faith" to believe in God. You forgot those last 4 words. But you ask why any self-aware entity would indulge in this... it is because we are self-aware. We are aware of who we are, our impending deaths and we try to make sense of our place in the universe. Faith offers comfort, perspective and a measure of control. All of which are illusions and fantasies. I prefer reality. Actually, that's not true. I love sci-fi and fantasy. BUT I live in reality. And fear is a really bad reason to believe in ANYTHING. I think it is a bit disingenuous to characterize faith as being intellectually lazy. Some of the greatest intellects the world has ever known have had a strong sense of faith. Did they now. And exactly who would you classify as some of the greatest intellects? Think about it this way: where is your mind? For centuries that question has caused philosophers to develop all sorts of strange answers. But in some way, shape or form the organic part of you fashions a self-aware sentience that is part of you. But is it indivisible? Can a sentience exist outside of its organic framework? My mind? You gotta be kidding me. My mind is in my brain. This is pretty much established by scientists, philosophers be damned. And no, a sentience cannot exist outside it's "framework". I don't know. I don't know how to prove it or disprove it. In essence, the answer of that question is beyond my ability to "know". In fact, I have resigned myself that I will never know, so instead... I believe. Whatever works for you... Personally, I like...oh nevermind... I have faith that no matter what the energy is within me that classifies me as being alive, when I die that energy will dissipate. Maybe quickly, maybe slowly. But regardless, the separation of material corpus and energy destroys my sentience. That separation ends my identity. That is the best I can do with what I have. I have no proof. I doubt I will ever have proof. But I need an answer so that I may choose how to live my life, so I give myself an answer. so....why not believe in unicorns? I like unicorns.... Just giving yourself an answer, as it were, IS intellectually lazy. It has the tendency to keep one from seeing the truth, uncomfortable though it may be. (wow, that was a bit of a ramble... my apologies) seen worse.. |
|
|
|
I think I did not express myself very clearly, I will try again. If I am wrong, then maybe I will be able to see it.
My major disagreement with you was your claim that faith is a belief without proof. My statement was that faith is a belief in something that cannot be proven. A little different. Faith is not just hopes and wishes or belief in something despite evidence to the contrary. I think it is completely possible for someone to believe in something despite contrary evidence. True, they might be classified as delusional; but there are also degrees of this. Personally, I hold the belief that if I commit no crime I am safe from imprisonment. This is not factually true (there are numerous examples that show being innocent of a crime is not always enough to keep you from jail), but it is a belief I hold to so that my life is more relaxed. Am I delusional for purposefully believing myself to be safer than I am? Maybe. So, the point I was trying to show is that believing in something without proof is too broad. I think faith is believing in something that CANNOT be proven. --Yes, I did omit the 4 words "to believe in God", thank you. As for the greatest intellects having faith, perhaps you and I do not agree on the term intellectual. I would classify artists, poets, scientists, engineers and statesmen as intellectuals. People who use their rational minds to relate to the world. People like Galileo, Einstein, Plato and Shakespeare. Your previous post asked why someone would indulge in faith. I offered some reasons that I believed someone would. Comfort, perspective and a measure of control are not illusions; they are states of being. If a person relies on faith to comfort them through tragedy, I don't see anything wrong with that (in fact, I am a little envious). Whether I agree with a person's choice to believe in something or not, I must allow that their faith changes their behavior -- often in positive ways. As to your comment that "just giving yourself answers" is intellectually lazy, you lost me. In order to learn new things, you have to make assumptions. Assumptions are like a temporary place holder for things we don't know. When we find our assumption is correct we replace the temporary thing with a permanent one; if it is wrong we replace it altogether. I am assuming that when I die my sentience is destroyed. I don't know that it will be. I don't know that the energy that is part of who I am will wink out of existence or slowly fade away. I don't know if in 30 years science will have created an artificial framework of my sentience. My faith lies in the understanding that when I die, I am gone. That faith changes the decisions I make on a daily basis, knowing that there is no reward (nor punishment) for me when I am finished. |
|
|