Topic: Glen Beck calls Obama a Racist | |
---|---|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Wed 07/29/09 10:18 PM
|
|
Wow. |
|
|
|
Wow. I know. |
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Wed 07/29/09 09:46 PM
|
|
Wow. I know. |
|
|
|
Wow. I know. |
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Wed 07/29/09 09:51 PM
|
|
Wow. I know. |
|
|
|
Nazis are not right wingers?Hitler wanted to restore "traditional German values" Are you saying that Nazi idealogy is not far rightwing idealogy? It depends what you call "right wing". Hitler could really get together with Stalin their only difference was about whether or not just own the capital (communism) or just control (dictate) the capital (things that make money, like factory and tools) but giving the illusion of private property. Today's what is "left wing" and "right wing" is really all mixed up. I would not call any of these parties (republicans/democrats) right wing anyhow..they are both left wingers. The only real true "right wing" are the libertarians, like Ron Paul. Stalin was about as socialistic as Hitler was liberal. Libertarians are libertarians. The Libertarian PARTY is right-wing, however. Also, the Dems/Repubs are both moderate right-wing parties and as a socialist, I can tell you Obama is no socialist. Most of us don't even consider him a leftist (I consider him a left-leaning centralist myself). |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 07/30/09 12:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nazis are not right wingers?Hitler wanted to restore "traditional German values" Are you saying that Nazi idealogy is not far rightwing idealogy? It depends what you call "right wing". Hitler could really get together with Stalin their only difference was about whether or not just own the capital (communism) or just control (dictate) the capital (things that make money, like factory and tools) but giving the illusion of private property. Today's what is "left wing" and "right wing" is really all mixed up. I would not call any of these parties (republicans/democrats) right wing anyhow..they are both left wingers. The only real true "right wing" are the libertarians, like Ron Paul. Stalin was about as socialistic as Hitler was liberal. Libertarians are libertarians. The Libertarian PARTY is right-wing, however. Also, the Dems/Repubs are both moderate right-wing parties and as a socialist, I can tell you Obama is no socialist. Most of us don't even consider him a leftist (I consider him a left-leaning centralist myself). Funny - I told people on here the same thing before the election. He leans towards the center. |
|
|
|
Wow. I know. |
|
|
|
Nazis are not right wingers?Hitler wanted to restore "traditional German values" Are you saying that Nazi idealogy is not far rightwing idealogy? It depends what you call "right wing". Hitler could really get together with Stalin their only difference was about whether or not just own the capital (communism) or just control (dictate) the capital (things that make money, like factory and tools) but giving the illusion of private property. Today's what is "left wing" and "right wing" is really all mixed up. I would not call any of these parties (republicans/democrats) right wing anyhow..they are both left wingers. The only real true "right wing" are the libertarians, like Ron Paul. Stalin was about as socialistic as Hitler was liberal. Libertarians are libertarians. The Libertarian PARTY is right-wing, however. Also, the Dems/Repubs are both moderate right-wing parties and as a socialist, I can tell you Obama is no socialist. Most of us don't even consider him a leftist (I consider him a left-leaning centralist myself). Funny - I told people on here the same thing before the election. He leans towards the center. He leans towards the center. |
|
|
|
Nazis are not right wingers?Hitler wanted to restore "traditional German values" Are you saying that Nazi idealogy is not far rightwing idealogy? It depends what you call "right wing". Hitler could really get together with Stalin their only difference was about whether or not just own the capital (communism) or just control (dictate) the capital (things that make money, like factory and tools) but giving the illusion of private property. Today's what is "left wing" and "right wing" is really all mixed up. I would not call any of these parties (republicans/democrats) right wing anyhow..they are both left wingers. The only real true "right wing" are the libertarians, like Ron Paul. Stalin was about as socialistic as Hitler was liberal. Libertarians are libertarians. The Libertarian PARTY is right-wing, however. Also, the Dems/Repubs are both moderate right-wing parties and as a socialist, I can tell you Obama is no socialist. Most of us don't even consider him a leftist (I consider him a left-leaning centralist myself). Funny - I told people on here the same thing before the election. He leans towards the center. He leans towards the center. Barack Obama will not govern from the "center right", but he will govern from the "center". That's not because he is "moving to the center". It's because the center of American politics has changed. It has moved where the American people are. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/does-obama-really-plan-to_b_145961.html?page=4 |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Thu 07/30/09 11:11 AM
|
|
Nazis are not right wingers?Hitler wanted to restore "traditional German values" Are you saying that Nazi idealogy is not far rightwing idealogy? It depends what you call "right wing". Hitler could really get together with Stalin their only difference was about whether or not just own the capital (communism) or just control (dictate) the capital (things that make money, like factory and tools) but giving the illusion of private property. Today's what is "left wing" and "right wing" is really all mixed up. I would not call any of these parties (republicans/democrats) right wing anyhow..they are both left wingers. The only real true "right wing" are the libertarians, like Ron Paul. Stalin was about as socialistic as Hitler was liberal. Libertarians are libertarians. The Libertarian PARTY is right-wing, however. Also, the Dems/Repubs are both moderate right-wing parties and as a socialist, I can tell you Obama is no socialist. Most of us don't even consider him a leftist (I consider him a left-leaning centralist myself). Funny - I told people on here the same thing before the election. He leans towards the center. He leans towards the center. Barack Obama will not govern from the "center right", but he will govern from the "center". That's not because he is "moving to the center". It's because the center of American politics has changed. It has moved where the American people are. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/does-obama-really-plan-to_b_145961.html?page=4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where is William Buckley when you need him; with one sarcastic stroke he elimentated the John Birchers and other wackos from the Republican Party and now with poor leadership we fall into this morass or more a$$.
|
|
|
|
Obama is our first Bi-Racial President...yet he focuses on his blackness more than anything..just my observation. He doesn't bring up his whiteness, did he claim to be the first Bi-Racial President? Or the first Black President? Right, Black President. Does anyone focus on Tiger Woods Korean Heritage? No, he is the first Black Golfer to do this and that.jmo |
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Thu 07/30/09 05:48 PM
|
|
Obama is our first Bi-Racial President...yet he focuses on his blackness more than anything..just my observation. He doesn't bring up his whiteness, did he claim to be the first Bi-Racial President? Or the first Black President? Right, Black President. Does anyone focus on Tiger Woods Korean Heritage? No, he is the first Black Golfer to do this and that.jmo |
|
|
|
Obama is our first Bi-Racial President...yet he focuses on his blackness more than anything..just my observation. He doesn't bring up his whiteness, did he claim to be the first Bi-Racial President? Or the first Black President? Right, Black President. Does anyone focus on Tiger Woods Korean Heritage? No, he is the first Black Golfer to do this and that.jmo I am half Cuban. Does that make me Cuban? |
|
|
|
Obama is our first Bi-Racial President...yet he focuses on his blackness more than anything..just my observation. He doesn't bring up his whiteness, did he claim to be the first Bi-Racial President? Or the first Black President? Right, Black President. Does anyone focus on Tiger Woods Korean Heritage? No, he is the first Black Golfer to do this and that.jmo I am half Cuban. Does that make me Cuban? Its not my opinion. Its what the goverment says |
|
|
|
No not racist. Just a birth certificate forging, socialist with no credentials . if you wanted to elect a BLACK president you should have elected one with um....charecter maybe. How about Michael Jordan, i mean.....duh, uh. He very well could be racist too though, he couldn't even decide what religion he was during his campaign. Funny how much he lies and they still love him....Hitler anyone? Can you prove any of that? That is what makes them so angry... besides even with proof it doesn't stop the craziness. TrueYou are right Half that stuff didnt even happen. And Obama forged his birth certificate when he was a baby? What? But the other half did Still worthless unless proved, and no one could. Talk is cheap and hearsay is blasphemy, I want to see PROOF.. Otherwise it is just talk |
|
|
|
I don't remember anyone mentioning slick Willie.
Nazis are not right wingers?Hitler wanted to restore "traditional German values" Are you saying that Nazi idealogy is not far rightwing idealogy? It depends what you call "right wing". Hitler could really get together with Stalin their only difference was about whether or not just own the capital (communism) or just control (dictate) the capital (things that make money, like factory and tools) but giving the illusion of private property. Today's what is "left wing" and "right wing" is really all mixed up. I would not call any of these parties (republicans/democrats) right wing anyhow..they are both left wingers. The only real true "right wing" are the libertarians, like Ron Paul. Stalin was about as socialistic as Hitler was liberal. Libertarians are libertarians. The Libertarian PARTY is right-wing, however. Also, the Dems/Repubs are both moderate right-wing parties and as a socialist, I can tell you Obama is no socialist. Most of us don't even consider him a leftist (I consider him a left-leaning centralist myself). Funny - I told people on here the same thing before the election. He leans towards the center. He leans towards the center. Barack Obama will not govern from the "center right", but he will govern from the "center". That's not because he is "moving to the center". It's because the center of American politics has changed. It has moved where the American people are. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/does-obama-really-plan-to_b_145961.html?page=4 |
|
|