Topic: Hawaii and Obama's Birth Certificate | |
---|---|
i never said there was any thing wrong with it
newer tecnology makes a newer format they are not on microfilm any more it would be nice if they could produce the origenal micro film with his in the proper place in sequence of recorded births tho and settle this once and for all ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
i never said there was any thing wrong with it
dont see a need - "this copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding"
newer tecnology makes a newer format they are not on microfilm any more it would be nice if they could produce the origenal micro film with his in the proper place in sequence of recorded births tho and settle this once and for all but borrowing your own line, what do I know ![]() |
|
|
|
Photoshop springs 2 mind
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
i never said there was any thing wrong with it
dont see a need - "this copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding"
newer tecnology makes a newer format they are not on microfilm any more it would be nice if they could produce the origenal micro film with his in the proper place in sequence of recorded births tho and settle this once and for all but borrowing your own line, what do I know ![]() did i say need why is it everyone reads what is not there ![]() ![]() ![]() i said it would be nice if they could produce the origenal micro film with his in the proper place in sequence of recorded births tho and settle this once and for all and if they did it would be done until then there will always be doubt it is not like they do not have it some where or do they (insert evil laugh here) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() actually no the law changed in 61 both parents had to be u s citizens if born out of the u s to have automatic citizenship that is what all the hoopla is about |
|
|
|
dont see a need - "this copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding" but borrowing your own line, what do I know ![]() did i say need why is it everyone reads what is not there ![]() ![]() ![]() i said ... |
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Tue 07/28/09 01:11 PM
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() actually no the law changed in 61 both parents had to be u s citizens if born out of the u s to have automatic citizenship that is what all the hoopla is about ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps. Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:" * Anyone born inside the United States * * Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe * Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S. * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national * Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year * Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21 * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time) * A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S. * There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision. http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html |
|
|
|
dont see a need - "this copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding" but borrowing your own line, what do I know ![]() did i say need why is it everyone reads what is not there ![]() ![]() ![]() i said ... i'm comin martha i'm comin as clasping chest in best sanford (red foxx) voice ![]() |
|
|
|
i never said there was any thing wrong with it newer tecnology makes a newer format they are not on microfilm any more it would be nice if they could produce the origenal micro film with his in the proper place in sequence of recorded births tho and settle this once and for all ![]() ![]() Why should it have to be settled again? |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
dont see a need - "this copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding" but borrowing your own line, what do I know ![]() did i say need why is it everyone reads what is not there ![]() ![]() ![]() i said ... i'm comin martha i'm comin as clasping chest in best sanford (red foxx) voice ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() actually no the law changed in 61 both parents had to be u s citizens if born out of the u s to have automatic citizenship that is what all the hoopla is about ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() i did not say whether i thought it was fake or not mirror i am beginning to think you just like to debate w/me ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
i never said there was any thing wrong with it newer tecnology makes a newer format they are not on microfilm any more it would be nice if they could produce the origenal micro film with his in the proper place in sequence of recorded births tho and settle this once and for all ![]() ![]() Why should it have to be settled again? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Tue 07/28/09 01:17 PM
|
|
i'm comin martha i'm comin as clasping chest in best sanford (red foxx) voice ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() gmta ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() actually no the law changed in 61 both parents had to be u s citizens if born out of the u s to have automatic citizenship that is what all the hoopla is about ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() i did not say whether i thought it was fake or not mirror i am beginning to think you just like to debate w/me ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
i never said there was any thing wrong with it newer tecnology makes a newer format they are not on microfilm any more it would be nice if they could produce the origenal micro film with his in the proper place in sequence of recorded births tho and settle this once and for all ![]() ![]() Why should it have to be settled again? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() so funny it is DISTRACTION from the real issues but hey........... |
|
|