Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: fox news
Ladylid2012 Joined Sun 07/05/09 Posts: 42269	Wed 07/15/09 12:02 PM
but this is not russia, i guess obama could do like bush and make up facts to invade a country. Bush isn't smart enough to do that on his own, Cheney does that part.

Drivinmenutz Joined Wed 11/14/07 Posts: 4290	Wed 07/15/09 12:07 PM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality. I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative". You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses. They are both false identifiers. Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations. I think, anyways, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong?

damnitscloudy Joined Sat 04/07/07 Posts: 11293	Wed 07/15/09 12:07 PM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality. I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative". You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses. They are both false identifiers. Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations. I think, anyways, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong? I just call them crazy hippies

Drivinmenutz Joined Wed 11/14/07 Posts: 4290	Wed 07/15/09 12:15 PM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality. I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative". You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses. They are both false identifiers. Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations. I think, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong? I just call them crazy hippies I think they were smokin too much ganja

Winx Joined Fri 08/31/07 Posts: 39051	Wed 07/15/09 12:27 PM
what he is doing is rather obvious. I'm not able to read minds.

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 01:00 PM
OK then we can come up with new name for republicans. hypocrite.

Winx Joined Fri 08/31/07 Posts: 39051	Wed 07/15/09 01:02 PM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality. I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative". You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses. They are both false identifiers. Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations. I think, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong? I just call them crazy hippies I think they were smokin too much ganja My mom's a 71 year old Democrat that's never smoked anything in her life.

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 01:12 PM
i no what the problem is, us democrats don't bug phones we don't make up stuff to invade someones country. as for the hippie comment. yes and always will be.we don't claim to the party of high morals. example mark Sanford.

FearandLoathing Joined Fri 12/28/07 Posts: 30121	Wed 07/15/09 02:07 PM
None of the news channels in the states are worthwhile, usually I watch the news on PBS. At least on PBS I don't have some ridiculous story mixed into tragedy, pain, and hate.

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 02:11 PM
well i mustly watch bbc . fox is bias msnbc is bias to.

Unknow Joined Fri 10/06/06 Posts: 4066	Wed 07/15/09 02:18 PM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality. I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative". You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses. They are both false identifiers. Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations. I think, anyways, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong? You can put different dressing on you salad but in the end its the same salad...Just some leaves are browner than others!!!

Unknow Joined Fri 10/06/06 Posts: 4066	Wed 07/15/09 02:20 PM Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 02:22 PM
i no what the problem is, us democrats don't bug phones we don't make up stuff to invade someones country. as for the hippie comment. yes and always will be.we don't claim to the party of high morals. example mark Sanford. Then why is the PATROIT ACT still law??????? NO PARTY HERE JUST AMERICAN!!!

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 02:26 PM
well lets see. maybe because bush was trying to scare everyone.maybe he made up facts like he did for Iraq, sometimes i,m proud to be an American.but no matter how long i live in USA. i will always be a Russian.

Drivinmenutz Joined Wed 11/14/07 Posts: 4290	Wed 07/15/09 03:10 PM
OK then we can come up with new name for republicans. hypocrite. Indeed, but don't forget the democrats. They aren't any better.

Dragoness Joined Wed 10/17/07 Posts: 23320	Wed 07/15/09 03:19 PM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality. I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative". You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses. They are both false identifiers. Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations. I think, anyways, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong? Liberals believe in freedom for all regardless to race background, etc... and having a supportive government. Consevatives stand on a claim of fiscal conservacy but never show that and they claim to be the moral thread of this country and don't show that either. As with all stands too much of anything is not good. We need balance. But with conservatives there is no give for the balance to happen. They believe they have the answers for everyone and that makes them wrong. At least liberals will live and let live.

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 03:58 PM
fox news is the one who start the rumor Obama is not an American citizen. fair an balance. yeah right. that's a joke. we all no they tell them on fox news to say. fox news is always pushing the Iraq war. must have never been in any war, [just on news some crazy ***** tried to run his car in to the white house. they killed his dumb *]

Drivinmenutz Joined Wed 11/14/07 Posts: 4290	Wed 07/15/09 04:00 PM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality. I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative". You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses. They are both false identifiers. Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations. I think, anyways, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong? Liberals believe in freedom for all regardless to race background, etc... and having a supportive government. Consevatives stand on a claim of fiscal conservacy but never show that and they claim to be the moral thread of this country and don't show that either. As with all stands too much of anything is not good. We need balance. But with conservatives there is no give for the balance to happen. They believe they have the answers for everyone and that makes them wrong. At least liberals will live and let live. Indeed. "Liberals" do. I have seen very, very few liberals in these threads.

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 04:03 PM
lets all watch fox news, we can kiss Sarah palin hypocrite butt together.she says we should take better care of our families. but of course her 17 year old daughter gets knocked up.

Winx Joined Fri 08/31/07 Posts: 39051	Wed 07/15/09 04:18 PM
lets all watch fox news, we can kiss Sarah palin hypocrite butt together.she says we should take better care of our families. but of course her 17 year old daughter gets knocked up. I don't care for Sarah Palin but I do believe that children are off-limits. Even the best parents have children that get pregnant.

Drivinmenutz Joined Wed 11/14/07 Posts: 4290	Wed 07/15/09 04:18 PM
lets all watch fox news, we can kiss Sarah palin hypocrite butt together.she says we should take better care of our families. but of course her 17 year old daughter gets knocked up. This attack is illogical as teenagers make their own decisions. Dose not necessarily mean Sarah was a bad mother... Now look what you have me doing...I'm standing up for republicrats.