Topic: Nude baby pictures | |
---|---|
naming the baby ass now huh
|
|
|
|
Yeah, i think it deserves its own post
|
|
|
|
could star thread ""name the ass"" but i bet it would take off in all directions |
|
|
|
I thought its name was Mr. Snookems Magee? Or Bob
|
|
|
|
NO!!!
Captain cosby sweater!!! |
|
|
|
How about Tinkywinky McAss
|
|
|
|
maybe it should be somethin simple like
JACK |
|
|
|
ooooooooooooooh
perfect! |
|
|
|
Hmmm, simple, but it works
|
|
|
|
I'n my opinion I think kids around the age of 1 shouldnt be running
around naked but it also depends how they are raised. Some are raised as a nudist so it kinda depends if I was naked it would scare people |
|
|
|
the age of...one? isn't that a little early to be concerned with
covering up the booty? it's very good for a baby's skin to be exposed to air, helps cut down on diaper rashes and such...the LAST thing i'm worried about is whether or not they are nude...at one. |
|
|
|
Hmmmmmmm oxymoron for me..
my children are 10 yrs apart so no didn't think the the first time around was anything but cute. Second time around with my second child, there was so much media hype I was a little nervous and cautious about it. Kinda sad when you think about it.. Now you have to watch for so many things you do with your children a swat on the butt or hand , pics etc...... You never know what you may be turned into as far as protective services..... Society has changed alot, in my 26 yrs. of raising children, and peoples ideas, and perceptions. |
|
|
|
I have nekkid booty pics of all my children. And I have them in frames
on the wall. I found pics of me and my brothers nekkid booties also. I don't think that pics of kids in the nude should be taken at all after the age of 2. |
|
|
|
well i never took any of my daugther at all she well soon be 2 and i
would not think of it now i think after the first 6 month they are to old for that |
|
|
|
baby pics are so darn cute!!!
lots of good websites to give awesome pics |
|
|
|
Don't have pictures of my baby's naked body, but I do have bubble bath
pictures where all you can see is her chest and tummy... now comment about the tickle freckles, that's a lil weird for me, but to each his own! But frontal nakedness is gross no matter how old you are... I don't even have any fresh born pictures of my baby's, ahem, nakedness... I think it's a bad deal... but I agree with the general consensus that baby butts are kinda cute |
|
|
|
laws vary by state of course but there are federal guidelines also, yes
taking pictures of babies butts is a touchy and often obscure topic although lulu I'd say taking pics of children up until they are aware and embarrassed of their nakedness could be too much by almost any states laws. As far as abuse most state laws are ok for spankings with a belt or paddle and some instances a switch as long as there is no bruising. I was whooped with a switch as a child and it did not have any negative effect whatsoever on me. |
|
|
|
as far as pics go, think abou tit like this. When the diaper goes
byebye so should the pics. The diaper leaves around 2 years of age on AVERAGE, and if htey are old enough to know about going to the potty and not need the diaper, then they are no longer babies, but toddlers. And nude pics of toddlers ARE illegal and disgusting. |
|
|
|
by aware...i'm not speaking of a ten-year-old, but of the age when they
start looking for privacy...that's a year-and-a-half, two, maybe...when they start wishing for the door on the bathroom to be shut when they use the restroom. and if i'm arrested for nudie pics of my toddler, so be it. i have bunches of tasteful ones...i snap pics constantly. |
|
|
|
I took b&w photo when my child was 3 months old. She was laying on her
stomach. Angled so you could see her face and butt in same frame. That was the only naked pic. Yes I definitely don't think it should go past the age of 1. Bathtub pics I always sat on the floor. That way the tub hid everything. |
|
|