Topic: Poll: Love at first sight? | |
---|---|
Edited by
Aries151
on
Tue 03/10/09 08:46 PM
|
|
Or lust at first sight?
|
|
|
|
love takes time to build... though i believe that lust at first sight is all too common.
|
|
|
|
I've had a pole at first site. Does that count?
|
|
|
|
It is lust only....love is not possible without a relationship attached. jmo
|
|
|
|
I believe you really have to know a person before you can be in Love, so I believe it's Lust at first sight, which goes away, and true love last forever.
|
|
|
|
It has been argued that "love at first sight" is an indication that a person fits your aenima / aenimus archetype particularly well.
http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/jung.html |
|
|
|
Either or, I'm ambidextrous....
|
|
|
|
Well, I've been intensely attracted at first site a few times -- that happens -- but I wouldn't call it "love." Not in the sense I normally use "love," anyway.
|
|
|
|
I'm in "love" with the thoughts of lust about her at the time
|
|
|
|
It has been argued that "love at first sight" is an indication that a person fits your aenima / aenimus archetype particularly well. http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/jung.html |
|
|
|
I dont believe in love at first site. There can be a attraction or lust if you wanna call it that. Love is something that grows when your relationship grows but not at first site.
|
|
|
|
let it burn
let it burn gotta let it burn... |
|
|
|
its lust at first site
|
|
|
|
Lust at first sight...
|
|
|
|
Ainjel who wouldnt have lust at first site when seeing you?
|
|
|
|
Ainjel who wouldnt have lust at first site when seeing you? |
|
|
|
lust.
|
|
|
|
mutual attraction
|
|
|
|
Or lust at first sight? love at first sight -Yes lust at first sight- NO WAY! |
|
|
|
I have experienced love at first sight, so I know it can happen.
|
|
|