Topic: Share the blame | |
---|---|
Americans are weighed down by about $900 billion in credit card debt, according to the latest available Federal Reserve figures.
Banks battered by the credit crisis bleed tens of billions from the losses. The largest credit-card banks each set aside between $1 billion and $3.5 billion in the third quarter for losses on card loans as their profits plummeted. Credit card charge-off rates, balances written off as unpaid, rose to 6.8 percent in August, up 48 percent from a year earlier, according to Moody's Investors Service. The biggest credit card lenders include Discover Financial Services LLC, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Capital One Financial Corp., American Express Co. and HSBC Holdings. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081113/ap_on_bi_ge/meltdown_credit_car Go ahead - Blame Bush and the government if it makes you feel better but us Americans loading up our credit cards and buying houses and driving autos that we can't afford - that's the real answer to the economic bubble bursting. Americans can't buy anything else because none of it is paid for. I will concede that government and bank policies contributed to the problem but Americans took advantage of those policies and they are the ones that owe these debts. Americans signed these contracts, not the government or Bush. The American people that lived as such must assume most of the blame for the economic crisis we are now in. Now, go read the article. Consumer advocates want to find a way to forgive some of these credit card debts. UNBELIEVABLE - ONLY IN AMERICA http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081113/ap_on_bi_ge/meltdown_credit_cards |
|
|
|
That is very true but it doesn't make it hurt any less.
|
|
|
|
the only ones to blame for the lending crisis is the lenders
if they do not qualify do not give them the money granted some are due to free trade agreement job loss but that started way b4 bush but if they did not give money almost anyone this would have never happened i feel it is the plan of the federal reservee to take control of the country and the world hopefully obama and the dems will abolish doing busines with the federal reserve (it is a private entity |
|
|
|
the only ones to blame for the lending crisis is the lenders if they do not qualify do not give them the money granted some are due to free trade agreement job loss but that started way b4 bush but if they did not give money almost anyone this would have never happened i feel it is the plan of the federal reservee to take control of the country and the world hopefully obama and the dems will abolish doing busines with the federal reserve (it is a private entity I think the blame lies with both, with the Lenders giving the loans, cards etc to people who really couldn't afford it (and they knew it) and a lot of the time really downplaying (or even lying about) the risks involved with some of these questionable loans. But, too, most Americans have the "now" mindset, I must have it now. And not only must I have it now, it must be at least as good as my sisters/neighbors/boss/bestfriend, if not better. A lot of people are going to come to very harsh reality of the term "living within your means." A lot of advantage was taken on both parts. And quite frankly, harsh as it sounds, I don't think anyone should be bailed out. Let it all fail, then start over from scratch. It won't kill us and then maybe some lessons will be re-learned. |
|
|
|
the only ones to blame for the lending crisis is the lenders if they do not qualify do not give them the money granted some are due to free trade agreement job loss but that started way b4 bush but if they did not give money almost anyone this would have never happened i feel it is the plan of the federal reservee to take control of the country and the world hopefully obama and the dems will abolish doing busines with the federal reserve (it is a private entity I think the blame lies with both, with the Lenders giving the loans, cards etc to people who really couldn't afford it (and they knew it) and a lot of the time really downplaying (or even lying about) the risks involved with some of these questionable loans. But, too, most Americans have the "now" mindset, I must have it now. And not only must I have it now, it must be at least as good as my sisters/neighbors/boss/bestfriend, if not better. A lot of people are going to come to very harsh reality of the term "living within your means." A lot of advantage was taken on both parts. And quite frankly, harsh as it sounds, I don't think anyone should be bailed out. Let it all fail, then start over from scratch. It won't kill us and then maybe some lessons will be re-learned. the point is the lender is the one at risk if they risk it they know they can lose it the borrower well hey they got what they wanted (at least for a while) the lender should be permitted to go under (they did not operate their business in a profitable manner) if you or i do this no govt money comes our way and the govt is the cause for a lot of small business failures they want big business and that is why they are bailing them out sorry but i have no concern for gm (i was going to buy a new imapla in 94-95 i think wanted nothing that was nt a standard option but they would not put them together) well when you do not give the customer what they want and you have it and they are willing to pay for it (i said i did not care if it took 6 monthes to get it) and time is not a major issue (then you deserve to go out of business but ya know what if gm goes out of business ford honda chrysler will be hiring so oh well |
|
|
|
but ya know what if gm goes out of business ford honda chrysler will be hiring so oh well Actually, better examples would have been the "foreign" car companies. My sister works for Chrysler, brother-in-law for Ford and they are in danger of going belly-up as well. My sister's on notice that she may not have a job as of 12/31. Merry Christmas! But, I agree with you. Using those specific examples, they did not keep up with the market demands. They felt they could keep on doing what they'd always done and we had to like it and live with it. Sadly, they are finding out, about 30 years after their first lesson in this, that they are dead wrong. |
|
|
|
but ya know what if gm goes out of business ford honda chrysler will be hiring so oh well Actually, better examples would have been the "foreign" car companies. My sister works for Chrysler, brother-in-law for Ford and they are in danger of going belly-up as well. My sister's on notice that she may not have a job as of 12/31. Merry Christmas! But, I agree with you. Using those specific examples, they did not keep up with the market demands. They felt they could keep on doing what they'd always done and we had to like it and live with it. Sadly, they are finding out, about 30 years after their first lesson in this, that they are dead wrong. well if gm goes down it will open a large market share and most that buy gm will go to ford or chyrsler mayb honda but what i wanted they used to do they refused to put the interior olor i wnated in the exterior color i wanted they did not want to build it they wanted me to buy off the lot (5-6 dif dealers) so gm i will never buy new gm ever again no matter how much money i have |
|
|
|
the only ones to blame for the lending crisis is the lenders if they do not qualify do not give them the money granted some are due to free trade agreement job loss but that started way b4 bush but if they did not give money almost anyone this would have never happened i feel it is the plan of the federal reservee to take control of the country and the world hopefully obama and the dems will abolish doing busines with the federal reserve (it is a private entity I think the blame lies with both, with the Lenders giving the loans, cards etc to people who really couldn't afford it (and they knew it) and a lot of the time really downplaying (or even lying about) the risks involved with some of these questionable loans. But, too, most Americans have the "now" mindset, I must have it now. And not only must I have it now, it must be at least as good as my sisters/neighbors/boss/bestfriend, if not better. A lot of people are going to come to very harsh reality of the term "living within your means." A lot of advantage was taken on both parts. And quite frankly, harsh as it sounds, I don't think anyone should be bailed out. Let it all fail, then start over from scratch. It won't kill us and then maybe some lessons will be re-learned. |
|
|
|
the only ones to blame for the lending crisis is the lenders if they do not qualify do not give them the money granted some are due to free trade agreement job loss but that started way b4 bush but if they did not give money almost anyone this would have never happened i feel it is the plan of the federal reservee to take control of the country and the world hopefully obama and the dems will abolish doing busines with the federal reserve (it is a private entity I think the blame lies with both, with the Lenders giving the loans, cards etc to people who really couldn't afford it (and they knew it) and a lot of the time really downplaying (or even lying about) the risks involved with some of these questionable loans. But, too, most Americans have the "now" mindset, I must have it now. And not only must I have it now, it must be at least as good as my sisters/neighbors/boss/bestfriend, if not better. A lot of people are going to come to very harsh reality of the term "living within your means." A lot of advantage was taken on both parts. And quite frankly, harsh as it sounds, I don't think anyone should be bailed out. Let it all fail, then start over from scratch. It won't kill us and then maybe some lessons will be re-learned. |
|
|
|
but ya know what if gm goes out of business ford honda chrysler will be hiring so oh well Actually, better examples would have been the "foreign" car companies. My sister works for Chrysler, brother-in-law for Ford and they are in danger of going belly-up as well. My sister's on notice that she may not have a job as of 12/31. Merry Christmas! But, I agree with you. Using those specific examples, they did not keep up with the market demands. They felt they could keep on doing what they'd always done and we had to like it and live with it. Sadly, they are finding out, about 30 years after their first lesson in this, that they are dead wrong. well if gm goes down it will open a large market share and most that buy gm will go to ford or chyrsler mayb honda but what i wanted they used to do they refused to put the interior olor i wnated in the exterior color i wanted they did not want to build it they wanted me to buy off the lot (5-6 dif dealers) so gm i will never buy new gm ever again no matter how much money i have |
|
|
|
did you know an american in the 50s went to the auto makers in detriot and told them what they needed to do
and they basically ran him out of town on a rail guess where he landed and guess who listened yep japan |
|
|
|
did you know an american in the 50s went to the auto makers in detriot and told them what they needed to do and they basically ran him out of town on a rail guess where he landed and guess who listened yep japan Oh that I believe. I grew up in Detroit, the entire area economy is all about the auto industry. People have been telling them for years that they are outdated and need to move it along. But, they wouldn't listen. It would have cut into their profits, then, to do what was necessary to compete in a world market. Now, there are no profits to cut in to, they're completely uncompetitive and are in a world of hurt. The unfortunate thing, they'll cease to exist but their employees will be left holding the bag, and left with nothing for all their years of hard work. |
|
|
|
did you know an american in the 50s went to the auto makers in detriot and told them what they needed to do and they basically ran him out of town on a rail guess where he landed and guess who listened yep japan Oh that I believe. I grew up in Detroit, the entire area economy is all about the auto industry. People have been telling them for years that they are outdated and need to move it along. But, they wouldn't listen. It would have cut into their profits, then, to do what was necessary to compete in a world market. Now, there are no profits to cut in to, they're completely uncompetitive and are in a world of hurt. The unfortunate thing, they'll cease to exist but their employees will be left holding the bag, and left with nothing for all their years of hard work. |
|
|
|
The Japanese were listening to American management consultant W. Edwards Deming, who told them they should produce high-quality, durable products, and stand behind their quality with warranties in order to sell their wares internationally. Not all Japanese manufacturers believed Deming, but some invested everything they had into Deming's ideas. One such company was Toyota,
http://www.answers.com/topic/automaker-1 scroll down to 1950–1980 |
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Thu 11/13/08 09:37 AM
|
|
I know a couple of people that have had to use their credit cards for food and medical.
|
|
|
|
I know a couple of people that have had to use their credit cards for food and medical. i hate when that happens but i have had to do it on occasion |
|
|
|
I know a couple of people that have had to use their credit cards for food and medical. i hate when that happens but i have had to do it on occasion I did for gasoline before. But..I ended that real quick. |
|
|
|
I know a couple of people that have had to use their credit cards for food and medical. Of course, for my part, I wasn't including necessities in credit card use. I was referring to "luxury" items that if someone had to pay cash upfront for, would clearly be out of their budget. No offense intended, I'm sorry if I did |
|
|
|
I know a couple of people that have had to use their credit cards for food and medical. Of course, for my part, I wasn't including necessities in credit card use. I was referring to "luxury" items that if someone had to pay cash upfront for, would clearly be out of their budget. No offense intended, I'm sorry if I did Ohhh..it wasn't about what you said. I was just thinking about people that have had no choice but to do that. And..there are those people that did it when they lost their jobs. My cousin's 19 yr. old son almost died and needed surgery and he was out-of-state. No insurance. The parents had to re-finance their home and max out their charge cards. But...once they do these things...it's a horrible cycle to get out of that situation. |
|
|
|
I know a couple of people that have had to use their credit cards for food and medical. Of course, for my part, I wasn't including necessities in credit card use. I was referring to "luxury" items that if someone had to pay cash upfront for, would clearly be out of their budget. No offense intended, I'm sorry if I did Ohhh..it wasn't about what you said. I was just thinking about people that have had no choice but to do that. And..there are those people that did it when they lost their jobs. My cousin's 19 yr. old son almost died and needed surgery and he was out-of-state. No insurance. The parents had to re-finance their home and max out their charge cards. But...once they do these things...it's a horrible cycle to get out of that situation. Yeah, it really is and I feel for those people, I've had to do the same on occasion. |
|
|