a former pothead or a former cokehead?

both are better than what we have now!!

Let me elaborate, the former pothead was a governor of Arkansaw, and the
former cokehead rebel governor of Texas...

how about BOZO???... lol!!

I want a President who actually had military experience then he / she
would know from a military stand-point before entering a war what would
be the best options and was to collect better intel before going a war.
This way our troops would be well informed of the situation, terrain,
strenght and weakness of the enemies strong hold. I want a present who
has a brain to be dimplomatic and say Hey we don't need this war why
don't we sit down and collaborate and see what we can do to settle our
problems without getting violent.

I want a president to realize tthat we have the proper resources to
actually synthesize oil and gas and it would take half-the cost of
importing it from the outside. But, of course the current president
won't do it because it would hurt the economical revenue. What's the
difference with this war going on all the money that would of belong to
us when we retire is now spent..

true eagle!

i want one who nos what wars is not one with silver spoon in his mouth.

Wow Gary that leaves out all the current democratic candidates if I am
not mistaken.

no that leaves out your buddy bush and your dishonest news fox last i
checked people voted to bring troops home 51 to 49.

gary's for the former pothead
that 1 vote for pothead

Provided both are still in the "former" category, I'd vote for whomever
could get a handle on Iraq. Sadly, it's rather like a paradox as one
cannot know how well of a job the pres will do until it's too late to
change one's mind.

V.

how about BOZO???... lol!!

4fun06 picked BOZO aka the cokehead
that's one vote for cokehead

Lady I like your style. Be nice if we could take all the candidates out
for a test drive before we actually selected one wouldn't it.

Thank you Garden!

The balace of a Nation shouldn't be forge on the forefront of war. Bush
was too eager to enter the war before thinking and giving it thought. If
you remember when 9/11 happened it wasn't even a day when Bush announced
that it was done by Osama Bin Laden. First, how did you come to that
conclusion? The definition of Terrorism isn't to kill people but, rather
put them in fear to the point that you cripple them. Logically the first
thing any real terriorist would of done is to take out The Power Grid or
Electricity. The next thing is too take out the telephone company and
without power and communication is the beginning to panic a nation and
the third, take out the bridges and cut of supply routes.

The attack on the WTC wasn't an attack it was merely a taunt or rather
more like an insult..

And, at the same token it showed how weak our own defenses are. If we
continue to allocated our soldiers to different countries that claim
they are in need of support.

Bush is causing your defenses to spread themselve to thin. Even the
reserves are being activated to fight in this war in Iraq.

The biggest question that should be asked and seems no one is asking
themselves cause they are so wrapped up with this war.


If at this moment there was a big retaliation and United States Got
attacked who going to defend the Country. What are you gonna activate
all and any survivors of the previous wars... Vietnam Veterans, YOur
world war 2 veterans and then i guess you gonna change the police in to
a military task force.

What are you gonna rely on NORAD hey if that missle or radar defense
system didn't protect the pentagon then how it's gonna help us.

what are we gonna become like the people in vietnam where women and
children were firing weapons and becoming suicide bombers.


Everday in the news or newspapaer i always seeing that bush is deploying
more troops to Iraq because the poorly equipped soldiers are coming home
in body bags and all they get is a Speech for a job well done and their
parents get a flag and a medal that their son or daughter served well in
war.

The casualities is unexceptable.. and would never have happened if we
didn't allow ourselves to enter this war.

If the terriorist bombed WTC that is a terrible event that happened but,
an end result that because of our government involvement has cause to
happen

From Day one the muslim nation has been telling the United States
Government to not interfere with their holy war.


If you look at the statistics before U.S Entered this war and before the
9/11 tragedy. More muslim and palestines, or any arabic people were
killed in mass number compared to the Jews.

too every 1 jew killed atleast 20 muslims were killed. Why because here
is a nation fighting with outdated pea shooters and rock, bottles, or
whatever is on the ground to throw at the jews. Whereas Israel has a
superior airforce, top of the line weapon and they have mortars, they
have scuds and so -on.

Which in the long run they have no trouble at all defending and being on
the offensive..


Fact, number 2 if we would go to war at this minute with North Korea
most of the nations would send their support all except for one Israel
cause they are too busy thinking i got to protect my country and my
people.

So, for the many of us people who are curious why would we help a nation
that won't help us?


Who is Running the Majority of Our Government and what are their
Nationality, Banks are owned by WHO?, Jewelry Shops are Owned by Who?

goooooooooooooooooooooo,,B-E-R-N-I-E

"Who is Running the Majority of Our Government and what are their
Nationality, Banks are owned by WHO?, Jewelry Shops are Owned by Who?"

<continuing in the same mindset>
Did you know the World Jew-er-ry council didn't pay bobby fisher for the
movie "searching for bobby fisher" or the game "bobby fisher teaches
chess"... they also had him kicked out of his apartment!
</continuing in the same mindset>

Welcome to the wonderful world of anti-world-jew.er.ry-council paranoia.

"If at this moment there was a big retaliation and United States Got
attacked who going to defend the Country. " retaliation? for what? from
who?

rsaylors


I guess you never heard that saying:" while you are attacking us... Who
is protecting you...

If you are gonna regard every single country as a terrorist nation and
keep on interfering with the affairs of other nations then in turn we
also become a terrorist So, have you thought that there are alot of
people and countries that we have pissed off in the past and if they
decide to band together and attack. Which would be a strategical
decision to do once america depletes their soldier count and reserves.

"If you are gonna regard every single country as a terrorist nation " If
we where hell-bent on imperializing the world then you'd be quite
right... But last i checked we're only pushing an our imperial power on
a few countries and trying to have them take over for themselves after
that. Very very few countries support international-terrorism and of
those fewer still support it against the US and of those none have a
fighting force that could put our cites in jeopardy of being invaded.

It doesn't make sense to fear a physical invasion of America any more
than it makes sense to fear the world-jew-conspiracy to screw-over bobby
fisher.

i voted for NIXON. maybe we should dig him up.