Previous 1 3 4
Topic: Another unfaithful politicain????
no photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:40 PM
John Edwards apparently wants nothing to do with the press these days in the wake of tabloid reports that he was caught visiting a mistress and their love child, the News & Observer reports. After giving a speech at a Washington hotel, Edwards slipped out through a kitchen exit and emerged in the rear of the hotel. When approached there by a reporter, he said, "Can't do it now, I'm sorry" when asked about the allegations.

The National Enquirer reported online earlier this month that its reporters had spotted Edwards visiting the woman, a former campaign videographer, at a California hotel. Edwards referred to the matter last week as "tabloid trash" but has not commented further.

Source News & Observer (Raleigh)

Now we may know the reason for the $400.00 haircuts

laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:43 PM
That's a tough one. I mean, if the Enquirer SAYS SO, IT MUST BE THE TRUTH!!! laugh laugh laugh

anniebananie85's photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:43 PM
hmm... let's see, your source is the national enquirer? must be true then, lol!

FearandLoathing's photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:44 PM

That's a tough one. I mean, if the Enquirer SAYS SO, IT MUST BE THE TRUTH!!! laugh laugh laugh


The end of the world will be on new years day 2000!!!

...err.indifferent

irartguy's photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:45 PM
He did have a few peculiar habits, I like him though -- overall.

I don't much care about who my politicians are boinking, as long as they do their jobs.

no photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:51 PM

He did have a few peculiar habits, I like him though -- overall.

I don't much care about who my politicians are boinking, as long as they do their jobs.


Not a very good political resume - I lied to my wife and kids.

no photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:53 PM
Hmm. John Edwards is a pimp.

BobbyJ's photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:56 PM
I really don't see the point of salacious hoopla over what anyone does in their own personal life. That's what sells the tabloids though. Maybe it's true about Edwards. That's an isuue between him and his wife, not the general mud seeking public. It's always the ones who point the finger, too, that have the most to hide themselves. I am so sick of hearing about this kind of crap against anyone.

irartguy's photo
Thu 07/31/08 08:56 PM


He did have a few peculiar habits, I like him though -- overall.

I don't much care about who my politicians are boinking, as long as they do their jobs.


Not a very good political resume - I lied to my wife and kids.


I suppose.

I'm a bit surprised that I hadn't heard this story anywhere else though, I'd have thought it would be a big deal.

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/31/08 09:29 PM
Straight from the Google page.
Three sources, which one did you get this story from??
laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


Edwards Dodges Press Over Tabloid Questions - Politics news ...Jul 31, 2008 ... (Newser) – John Edwards apparently wants nothing to do with the press these days in the wake of tabloid reports that he was caught visiting ...
www.newser.com/story/33858/edwards-dodges-press-over-tabloid-questions.html - 5 hours ago - Similar pages - Note this

Lindsay Lohan and Sam Ronson: Inseparable in LA |John Edwards apparently wants nothing to do with the press these days in the wake of tabloid reports that he was caught visiting a mistress and their love ...
celebrityandstars.com/?p=12180 - 416k - 5 hours ago - Cached - Similar pages - Note this


Above the Law - A Legal Tabloid - News, Gossip, and Colorful ...Update / Correction: According to reports received after this post was .... John Edwards was caught visiting his mistress and secret love child at 2:40 this ...
abovethelaw.com/2008/07/ - 662k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this


laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Lynann's photo
Thu 07/31/08 09:47 PM
Boinking...it's a great word.

Until I see more creditable reporting than The Enquirer I will reserve judgment.

no photo
Fri 08/01/08 10:57 AM
If someone is willing to betray the trust of their wife and children, how can we expect that person to be trustworthy? Really? To you, whom he doesn't even know? If he will betray his wife, then any trust you put into him is wasted.

Credible evidence: John Edwards is a trial attorney with an excellent record. If these claims are false, then they are libel and he would make millions on a lawsuit and he could demand a printed apology. John Edwards has not sued and in fact, feigned ignorance about the whole incident. If reporters chased you into a bathroom and you had to hold the door closed and wait for a security guard to show up, would you have forgotten the incident 2 days later? Yeah, he's cheating and he has a love child with the woman.

It's important, because it speaks to his willingness to keep commitments and his trustworthiness. If it was a Republican, it would be all over the news.

Lynann's photo
Fri 08/01/08 02:09 PM
It isn't at all unusual for well known people to use entrances and exist to hotels, businesses and public buildings. Usually because they are easier to access and in some cases to protect both the public and themselves.

The alleged woman involved also has denied the accusations of an affair.

no photo
Fri 08/01/08 02:12 PM

It isn't at all unusual for well known people to use entrances and exist to hotels, businesses and public buildings. Usually because they are easier to access and in some cases to protect both the public and themselves.

The alleged woman involved also has denied the accusations of an affair.


Okay, believe what you want. If you think John Edwards would allow such libel to exist when he could easily sue the Enquirer and make loads of cash, more power to you.

You don't think it's a little strange that he had to hide from reporters in a bathroom and then pretended to not remember the event? That's not a little fishy?

no photo
Fri 08/01/08 03:04 PM
If someone is willing to betray the trust of their wife and children, how can we expect that person to be trustworthy? Really? To you, whom he doesn't even know? If he will betray his wife, then any trust you put into him is wasted.

well said Spidercmb

Also just might explain why he said a few months ago he had no interest in VP.


Fanta46's photo
Fri 08/01/08 04:05 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Fri 08/01/08 04:09 PM
Y'all sure do make a lot of presumptions against others, while ignoring the obvious when it concerns Bush and his Administration!

Let's say that this woman who worked for Edwards had asked him for advice concerning something very personal, or visa versa for that matter.
Now Mr. Spider says he should sue to prove your assumptions are lies. He should sue to prove his innocence. If he was to sue, just to shut up the doubters and Prove his innocence, wouldn't he have to reveal the confidential personal information to the public?
Would you think that would be ethical?
Would you want a confidant of yours to do that?

And, what about the source? The Enquirer?? LMAO..
Most of all, what about the presumption of innocence until proven guilty?

Until you come up with a better source than The Enquirer or Republican Rhetoric, I'll take the word of a man who I have no reason not to believe!

no photo
Fri 08/01/08 06:01 PM

Y'all sure do make a lot of presumptions against others, while ignoring the obvious when it concerns Bush and his Administration!

Let's say that this woman who worked for Edwards had asked him for advice concerning something very personal, or visa versa for that matter.
Now Mr. Spider says he should sue to prove your assumptions are lies. He should sue to prove his innocence. If he was to sue, just to shut up the doubters and Prove his innocence, wouldn't he have to reveal the confidential personal information to the public?
Would you think that would be ethical?
Would you want a confidant of yours to do that?

And, what about the source? The Enquirer?? LMAO..
Most of all, what about the presumption of innocence until proven guilty?

Until you come up with a better source than The Enquirer or Republican Rhetoric, I'll take the word of a man who I have no reason not to believe!



No, he could prove it wasn't his love child with a simple DNA test. He wouldn't have to betray confidences.

I'm sure he was helping her with a "problem" from 9:30 PM until 2:40 AM.

01tim's photo
Fri 08/01/08 06:12 PM
well all i can say is it proves at least democrats like women. republican can say that. remember Larry Craig.

Fanta46's photo
Fri 08/01/08 06:13 PM
What about Innocent until proven guilty????

The story is Old!!
The article says,

In October, the woman posted an online statement denying the first story. In December, an Edwards campaign worker claimed to be the father of the woman's then-unborn child.

This is Aug.

The Republicans are busted day in day out for spreading lies on their blog sites. That is where this story is reemerging.
There are only three sites it Googles back to and all three are Republican Blogs!

Edwards is a possible choice for Obama's VP even though he says he's not interested.

Add it up! Just dont forget to add a smiggin of common sense in with it!!


no photo
Fri 08/01/08 06:14 PM

What about Innocent until proven guilty????

The story is Old!!
The article says,

In October, the woman posted an online statement denying the first story. In December, an Edwards campaign worker claimed to be the father of the woman's then-unborn child.

This is Aug.

The Republicans are busted day in day out for spreading lies on their blog sites. That is where this story is reemerging.
There are only three sites it Googles back to and all three are Republican Blogs!

Edwards is a possible choice for Obama's VP even though he says he's not interested.

Add it up! Just dont forget to add a smiggin of common sense in with it!!




So John Edwards would rather be smeared than to get a DNA test done to prove his innocence? Yeah, you are using your common sense.

Previous 1 3 4