I've seen this before on another cable news station covering the election, but I've seen it to a whole new level today on CNN. Before they were discussing how Barack was highly popular, treated like a movie star, thoughout the world. In Europe there were polls where he got high ratings and he even won a mock election in Europe as well. Today, on CNN the correspondents were throughout the world showing newspapers from there and such celebrating Barack's victory, and they even went to Obama, Japana, again, a city that changed their name for him.

Now, you can see this a few ways. Here are a few:

1. So What?
2. Good, we need to unify with the rest of the world
3. Bad, do you need any more evidence of globalist movements?


Personally, the fact that Obama is so widely praised, treated like a star, and so forth throughout places in the world highly concerns me. He is being praised in big government, much more socialist leaning countries. He has much more encompassing government ideas well, much more involved in the lives of the average citizen through vast government-run programs. He has also gotten the support and has links to socialist leanings.

He assisted in putting forth and supporting the Global Poverty Act, has supported and is supported by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont (admitted socialist), was supported by the Democratic Socialists of America and he showed up to eulogize a well-known Chicago socialist activist Saul Mendelson.

The Global Poverty Act would increase world aid tremendously, and it was an initiative put forth by the UN. So, Obama's policy plan is directly linked to a globalist initiative.

George Soros is a huge globalist, huge financier and backer of Obama through multiple organizations he started up or runs that are dumping massive amounts of cash into Obama's camp.

The path to a global government, not one I wish to take.

Good for you. We really don't need to care about each other or take care of our resources. Where is my Hummer? Here is a $$$ spent by the current administration in one overseas nation for you: $525,413,450,000 and growing by the second. Want to take guesses? I guess fighting poverty would be a much more unworthy cause (not as if what you say is anything more than innuendo).

well, concidering our present leader is a lying, decieving IDIOT, I think Barak will do just fine!!!!!

Yes well good luck trying to convince the brain dead in this country. They are dupped as well....

For the record...It's a disgrace what our choices are. Don't think these choices aren't from the global elite. I can't wait for the day when they have to answer for their abominations on humanity.

I thought the Obama, Japan thing was just a coincidence and it was already named that before Barack started running for any office.

Also, we could of had Ron Paul, half of Obama's speech last night wouldn't have been applicable to Dr.Paul, plus while Obama is a better speaker than the Dr., there's no way he could beat the Good Dr. in a fair debate on the issues. The Dr. would spank Obama, too bad Barack has it easy, taking on the king flip flopper, coupled with the most campaign workers (read lobbyists) having to step down for this corruption or that business dealing than any of the dems.
Unless something drastic is done,Obama is going to spank McCain. we will have a very liberal president, who has talked about Government deciding what people get to eat? McCains no better, but I think Obama is going to kick his a$$.
We don't have angels who are seeking power in our government.
" I see the reaper in the mirror..."

He is better than the republican guy ( John McCain ).

warmachine,

I'm not sure what you meant by Obama 'deciding what people get to eat'.

Would you care to clarify?

I'm trying to eat healthier, even though I grew up in a rural area.

My parents grew up on farms and farmers didn't worry too much about cholesterol.

I just replaced most of my incandescent light bulbs with florescent ones.

Not because I'm worried about my 'carbon footprint', but because it's more economical.

Yes, I too supported the good DR. I am really not looking forward to more government control. Thats y I will most likely voting for McCain. If Paul gets on the ballot though I might as well vote for him. I don't understand why he didn't have a better following. I guess people actually want the government to run their lives.

I recall Mr.Obama making a statement about how Government could effectively help health costs by deciding what people can or can't eat.

warmachine,

I'm not sure what he means by that.

I went to his website and found this:

'Too little is spent on prevention and public health: The nation
faces epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases as well as new
threats of pandemic flu and bioterrorism. Yet despite all of
this less than 4 cents of every health care dollar is spent on
prevention and public health.'

So, I assume he is going to advocate for more dollars spent on prevention and public health.

I agree with the obesity epidemic.

Also, diabetes is also on the rise, as are other chronic diseases.

But how do you change people's behavior so that they eat healthier, get more exercise, or quit smoking?

After all, they have a right to eat what they want, even if it's not good for them, not exercise, and smoke to their heart's content!

I know there are programs already in place to help kids become healthier, like the President's Challenge.

http://www.presidentschallenge.org/

Well, when a presidential candidate says something like that, then you look at the law that was trying to be passed about resturants having to weigh you and kick you out if you way too much, nevermind the socialist connotations a statement like that calls to mind.

You forget, it is the poor people's own dam fault they are poor by the neocons, so no need for help for them, the global warming thing is a fearmongering tactic designed to scare us into ........saving our planet, duh. Oh and we must war, war, war, we need to be killing up some folks because the war on terror is upon us, although, Iraq and Afganistan are not the central headquarters of terrorism but to hear tell by neocons it is. Oh and neocons believe any Arabic blood will do for 9/11, not the blood of the people who actually did it.

We need McCain in office like we need another bullet to the head, Bush, because he will have his 100 year war, come hell or high water and we will have drafts and to hell with the economy, which the stimulus check should have fixed

I think restaurants should be required to list the ingredients in their menus, especially the harmful ones, like cholesterol, sodium and sugar.

We should all vote for Grampy McSame so he can tell the damn Iranians to get off our lawn!!!

<------------

Grampy McSame!

All of my friends know who I'm talking about when I say Gollum, so I might not want to switch it, especially after seeing that Speech, with the twitchy broken face smile...

"MYYY PREEECCIOOUSSS!"

Actually, global warming is kind of a scare tactic. I mean its nice to do things to help the planet, but to lie to people and say we are causing all of this stuff. Just look at the facts, history shows that our planet is constantly going through either a warming or cooling period. Its a natural cycle.

I will also agree with you that for some poor people, it is their fault they are poor. Sure some people would have to put more work in than others, but I believe that most people have the ability to be successful. They just need to drive to get to where they want to be.

Congratulations! With Bush's popularity at a record
low of all time for U.S. Presidents, the Democrats
have scoured the earth and finally come up with a
candidate who polls in a statistical dead heat with
the Republican nominee - and his numbers may be
slipping. Hats off to the Democrats for their astounding
accomplishment!

And on the other hand you have the people (which the number is growing) who believe the government should take all responsibility for them and take care of them from cradle to grave... Which is worse?

i have heard no current candidate actually come up with any ideas to fix any problems we really have. But whatever. McCain is no worse than Obama frankly. He's just better at manipulating people through public speech.