LonelyWalker,

I have never suggested that we divide the threads into Christian or non Christian. We, (mostly Abracadabra,) has been told to "start his own threads" and to "get out" and "stay out" of Christian threads.

This division was started by Wouldee and supported and repeated by Morningsong.

This is not going to happen.

Gee what would be the fun in that?????

JB

I can't tell. I have not witnessed. I can't go by hearsay. If not I would be creating a "myth" right?flowerforyou

If you have been reading the threads you would have seen it.
Did you not read the threads?

JB

abra.

here you go again, mischaracterizing my words deliberately once more.

Not to mention putting words in my mouth.

Speak for yourself, whicjh is a completely foreign concept for you.

You do the same thing with your bashiung of Christianity out of both sides of your mouth and then wipe your sleeve and say, "what did I do wrong?"

You don;t like it going both ways.

You have had your little reign of passve-aggresive terror unchecked for far too long..

That was not tacit approval, nor was it your gift from any, Abra.

Your momentum has gotten you far off course AND YOU MUST BE CHECKED.


Stop your abuse and see it for what it is.

the prselytizing you do for pantheism is your own hypocrisy. Must you also double down andproselytize a false christianity and unprselytize your machinations as well?

Get over your arrogant self righteousness and make sense.


You just aren't used to being called out.

Get used to it Abra.

Everywhere you turn, when free time warrants and you get out of line, I shall remind you.

Not a stalking threat at all

Just time is up for you.

You are done making a mockery of anything not to your liking in the bashing and disrespectfulk and intolerant foolishness which you have come to enjoy as though you have a right to it


You have no rights here, Abra,

NO ONE DOES.

these are priveleges afforded by a private enterprise.

Go stand on the corner and spout out.

No one posted there for you to glean inspiration from on how to insult and offend, but I am sure you will learn.

You will probably be cited for disturbing the peace. At least then you would have some governance over your foolish and childish rants.

But here, Abra, do not be so mis;led to think that you have any rights to be abusive and offensive, no matter your mission. No matter your high opinion of yourself.

Everything you do is a privelege, and yours end where others begin.

If you want to debate ypour ilk, start a thread.

If yo want to bash Chrisrtiuanity and profess your authoritarian wqualifications, then do so in the snactity of your own threads.

Your incessant mischaracterizations and generally conclusory diatribe is not going to be tolerated any more with tacit approval from me by silence.

No more.

Never again.

You offend too many.

You hhave no decency, and it is being reminded you that you are out of line.

get used to it.


as long as you misrepresent Christianity at all. You have renounced it and are not a Christian and that gives you no right to ponttificate to others what constitutes Chjristianity.

Proselytize your pantheisim. Start your threads.

Babysit them.

Stop hijacking the others that are expressing their joy in things renounced by you.

It is not your job to be the savior of JSH.

it is not your right at all.

Get over your self righteous arrogance and be decent.

Show some manners, man!!!!!


and Quit antagonizing me with your mischaracterizatiuons of my words.

You are abusive and offensive and insulting.

Slander is slander Abra.

You have no rights here above any others.

Remember that.

Seriously, Abra.


REMEMBER THAT!!!!!

Therefore, one can't generalize over the whole christianity. If I'm a christian and I have not done it. That means that the whole christianity is not so or so as most of the times is generalized.

Here is one of Wouldee's rants. There are a few others.

I have never made a statement about the whole of Christianity. When I say things like "they" or "you people" , I am referring to the individuals who are doing or have done the thing of which I speak. Certainly not all of Christendom. I am not like that. I hold individuals accountable for their actions, not entire groups. However, in the interests of convenience, I use pronouns. Please understand they are not aimed at all Christians. When I said they want us to stay out of their threads, I was referring to the individuals who actuall said that. Not you, or anyone who did not say that.

Do you understand what I am saying?

within my limited english I do.
just joking
I got u.

doesn't an action require a reaction?
I don't approve the reaction. However, in different words, and with less anger (which I must confess I have felt) I have told him similar things.

my question was not so much a reflection on your ability to understand as my ability to express.

my question was not so much a reflection on your ability to understand as my ability to express.

To LonleyWalker,

An emotional "reaction" is negative and generally unproductive.

A "reaction" is usually emotional and not well thought out.

When you are the effect of something you are in a negative state of mind.

I think that when you feel anger as a result of the words of another person, and you react in anger, you have lost control and you are not thinking clearly.

I also think that people react in anger when their beliefs are opposed because they are emotional about what they believe.

I can relate to this, as I was once involve in a cult that I felt very strongly about and I experienced negative reactions when people challenged my beliefs.

I have since learned that my beliefs were wrong. They were a lie. I was defending a lie with anger and emotion.

So I can relate to that.

So instead of reacting in anger, instead listen with reason and calm to the arguments presented and consider that there might be some truth to them.

You might want to read the book I posted about: "The Book your Church doesn't want you to read."

It is very eye opening.

JB

you are absolutely correct with regard as to react based upon anger. I have said it before, and i say it now. that is something i have to deal everyday. Probably with time, and more maturity I will get better.
However, the rest of my post tells a lot more other things, that can be used to make a more fair judgment of the three sentences you picked.
With regard the book. You have gave me curiosity.
However, a book is a book. I can publish a book assuring pigs fly, but what are my qualifications.
therefore, a book is not what is written. It's also the author, his/her education background, his philosophy, etc.

This book does not really have a single author. It has contributors. It is more like compiled historical information. Their are about 14 contributors.