Topic: A Negative Number Of Bears | |
---|---|
41+56-146=?
Hint: This is the number of bears currently in Canada. |
|
|
|
BEARS?????????????????? wait -------BEERS...
|
|
|
|
-49???
|
|
|
|
41+56-146=? Hint: This is the number of bears currently in Canada. Raccoons can do math? Whooda thunk it! |
|
|
|
-49??? Yes, Mrs. moofooga, raccoons do math all the time! It's part of their mathological teaching method taught to all forest-dwellers and certain pygmies living in east Australia! |
|
|
|
-49??? How is there a negative number of bears??? that doesnt make sense to me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Sat 04/05/08 08:57 PM
|
|
-49??? How is there a negative number of bears??? that doesnt make sense to me According their last count of the bear population, the results turned out negative. There is a negative number of bears roaming around the forests of Canada. How? |
|
|
|
Sounds like the scientists up there in Canada need to stop smoking the wacky tobaccy and come up with some REAL math for once. That, or put some raccoons on their computations team.
|
|
|
|
WTF? There are negative bears roaming forests? I thought negative was somthing that ISNT there, so wouldn't a bear in a forest be a plus bear instead of a minus bear? Are the scientists getting out in the fresh air or have they lost it finally?
|
|
|
|
and i thought i sucked at math
|
|
|
|
moofooga: ""Sounds like the scientists up there in Canada need to stop smoking the wacky tobaccy and come up with some REAL math for once. That, or put some raccoons on their computations team.""
damnitscloudy: ""WTF? There are negative bears roaming forests? I thought negative was somthing that ISNT there, so wouldn't a bear in a forest be a plus bear instead of a minus bear? Are the scientists getting out in the fresh air or have they lost it finally?"" Rarely have I guffawed so heartily about something I read online. But it's true. Scientists really need to do some more research on this; it might be a new variety of anti-matter sustaining these bears in a supra-dimensional reality, centered in Canada. |
|
|
|
Why are bears in Canada so negative?
|
|
|
|
Why are bears in Canada so negative? |
|
|
|
Bears in America have more right to be negative.... The economy is going south, the fish they eat are all filled with PCBs due to wastewater runoff, hunting regulations have been relaxed, and the only publicity they get is when they climb a tree in a city that doesn't have a lot of bears and the 11:00 news shows them getting shot out of the tree with a dart gun.
I think Canadian bears should be more positive. |
|
|
|
I think you guys should lay off the wacky tabacky.
|
|
|
|
that goes especially for ZPicante. i've never seen a raccoon high on the wacky-tobacky.
|
|
|
|
Exactly! One of the many questions biodiverseologists intend to answer through bear-probing and innovative technology capable of visifying the minus bear population. Visifying! heehee Innovative visification of oppugnant Canuck bruins. I love it! |
|
|
|
Bears in America have more right to be negative.... The economy is going south, the fish they eat are all filled with PCBs due to wastewater runoff, hunting regulations have been relaxed, and the only publicity they get is when they climb a tree in a city that doesn't have a lot of bears and the 11:00 news shows them getting shot out of the tree with a dart gun. I think Canadian bears should be more positive. you made my tummy have a chuckle |
|
|
|
Bears in America have more right to be negative.... The economy is going south, the fish they eat are all filled with PCBs due to wastewater runoff, hunting regulations have been relaxed, and the only publicity they get is when they climb a tree in a city that doesn't have a lot of bears and the 11:00 news shows them getting shot out of the tree with a dart gun. I think Canadian bears should be more positive. you made my tummy have a chuckle Glad I can be of service. (= |
|
|