Community > Posts By > makenwallo
http://youtu.be/BdtxHEIbeZE Taking away people's right to free will and self actualisation by nullifying religion is not a solution to ending war.. Many religions are peace loving and serve as a moral guide to do good and do no harm ... Dangerous minds .. Inciting fear and war ... using religion as a scapegoat to justify cowardly acts of terrorism is the problem... agree. but this video contains content from SME, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds. http://youtu.be/IDkzcgCajRo Guy Sebastian .. Can't we all just get along ..... Some only want some shelter Some want a mansion in the sky Some want a thousand virgins Some move matter with their mind And when all the worlds collide All they know is to divide And it's easy if they're faceless To hate the other side And the others caught between Are the only ones to bleed And the ones they leave behind Can only sit and cry Dear God, dear soul Dear Mary, Muhammad Can we all just get along? Can we all just get along? Dear heart, dear life Dear soldier, dear martyr Where did we go wrong, Can we all just get along? Some set fire to crosses Some fight to ride the bus they choose Some don’t believe at all But do anything to make the news And when all the worlds collide All they know is to divide And it's easy if they're faceless To hate the other side And the others caught between Are the only ones to bleed And the ones they leave behind Can only sit and cry Dear God, dear soul Dear Mary, Muhammad Can we all just get along? Can we all just get along? Dear heart, dear life Dear soldier, dear martyr Where did we go wrong, Can we all just get along? Maybe if we’d work together We’d already have a heaven here on earth Dear God, dear soul Dear Mary, Muhammad Can we all just get along? Can we all just get along? Dear heart, dear life Dear soldier, dear martyr Where did we go wrong, Can we all just get along? Dear God, dear soul Dear Mary, Muhammad Can we all just get along? Can we all just get along? Dear heart, dear life Dear soldier, dear martyr Can we all just get along? Can we all just get along? thank u Is this a holy book |
|
|
|
22/07/2011 Charlie Hebdo: Norway's Christians didn't have to apologise for Anders Breivik, and it's the same for Muslims now It's as if no one in any Western country has ever gone berserk with a gun in a public place before The important thing must be to establish the rules, so we can all get along. To start with, are you allowed to be critical of Muhammad at all? For example, can you suggest that while he was generally perfect, he could sometimes be quite forgetful, and wander into Mecca saying "what did I come out here for"? If you say "he was the best prophet going, but I have to be honest and say he was **** at table tennis", does that warrant an execution or just a wallop with some pebbles? And are all images banned, as there seems to be some confusion over this? Maybe there’s a moderate wing of Islamic State, that says it’s alright as long as he’s drawn from the left as that shows off his best side. Can you draw him if his face isn’t revealed, like the band Slipknot, or The Stig? There should be an agreed and written code, as the stakes for getting it wrong seem to be fairly high. I suppose the one comfort we can take from this week’s events, is that some of us are lucky enough to live in a society based on Western values, because in countries like America you can’t imagine a lunatic ever going berserk with a gun in a public place. READ MORE Follow the Paris shootings live 'One million copies' of Charlie Hebdo to be be published #JESUISCHARLIE HASHTAG USED ACROSS THE WORLD One way in which we’re ensuring we protect those values, is by demanding all Muslims denounce the gunmen. It’s true that every Muslim leader in Britain has denounced them several times, but that’s hardly sufficient. They might denounce them at five past three, and then again at twenty past three, but what are they doing in between? For all we know they’re blowing themselves up at bus garages. So to truly distance themselves from the shooting, every Muslim should have to draw their own satirical cartoon involving Muhammad trampolining on a pig, so we know we can trust them. Similarly, when the Norwegian Christian Anders Breivik committed his massacre, all decent people marched straight down to the church and yelled "oy vicar, why haven’t you issued a statement condemning the shooting"? And politicians insisted Special Branch must infiltrate every C of E jumble sale to prevent similar radical movements growing throughout Surrey. When Newcastle gunman Raoul Moat went crazy, I’m sure I remember interviewers, callers on phone-in shows and website forums insisting it was up to so-called moderate Geordies to denounce these atrocities, and X Factor started that week with Louis Walsh saying he wouldn’t take part unless Cheryl Cole condemned this "foul evil act of pure foul evil, carried out by her own people". Nigel Farage has concluded the murders in Paris prove there’s a “fifth column” seeking to destroy us from within, adding “On a cultural level, what price anybody who is a stand-up comic, a cartoonist, a newspaper columnist, who wants to say something critical about Islam at all?” This is a fair point, because it’s hard to think of a single newspaper that at any time has ever said anything critical about Islam isn’t it? The Daily Mail for example is virtually a tabloid version of The Koran, and reading The Sun is like watching a Bin Laden video with added ****. Out in rural Kent, where Nigel Farage is standing to be MP, it’s just Allah Allah Allah all day long. You try buying a buttered scone in Broadstairs during Ramadan. The claim that Farage and many others appear to make is that Islam is inevitably violent, to which others reply that it’s a religion of peace, with each side quoting chunks of religious text to make their case. But this probably doesn’t help to settle the argument, as every religion’s holy book is a chaotic mixture. The Old Testament is like an episode of The Sopranos written by someone on crack, with prophets murdering children for calling them "baldhead" and nations destroyed with locusts. But most of us can pass a church without thinking "we should deport those loonies, they want to turn you into a pillar of salt". Because Christianity can be interpreted in any way you like. You can be a Christian and believe that means you should be generous, peaceful, modest and love thy neighbour. Or you can be a Christian and be a Tony Blair. There’s room for everyone. The same could be true of all faiths, its followers ranging from the heroic to the despicable, all of them justifying their actions by finding the relevant quote in their holy text. So the most logical response to any supposedly religious act is to respond to the act and not the religion. But there is one other possibility that’s been overlooked. Maybe the murderers are confused by the British government’s attitude towards crazy Islamic gunmen, which has appeared inconsistent. Not long ago President Assad of Syria, whose record for madness and violence is exemplary, was invited by the Prime Minister to stay at Buckingham Palace. And the rulers of Saudi Arabia, who recently got through 19 executions in one month, are sold billions of pounds worth of weapons. So maybe the gunmen’s strategy was to prove how mental they were, thinking they’d then be invited for biscuits with The Queen, and then be asked to do a deal for a tank. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/charlie-hebdo-how-exactly-would-we-like-muslims-to-condemn-these-attacks-9966176.html |
|
|
|
22/07/2011 Charlie Hebdo: Norway's Christians didn't have to apologise for Anders Breivik, and it's the same for Muslims now It's as if no one in any Western country has ever gone berserk with a gun in a public place before The important thing must be to establish the rules, so we can all get along. To start with, are you allowed to be critical of Muhammad at all? For example, can you suggest that while he was generally perfect, he could sometimes be quite forgetful, and wander into Mecca saying "what did I come out here for"? If you say "he was the best prophet going, but I have to be honest and say he was **** at table tennis", does that warrant an execution or just a wallop with some pebbles? And are all images banned, as there seems to be some confusion over this? Maybe there’s a moderate wing of Islamic State, that says it’s alright as long as he’s drawn from the left as that shows off his best side. Can you draw him if his face isn’t revealed, like the band Slipknot, or The Stig? There should be an agreed and written code, as the stakes for getting it wrong seem to be fairly high. I suppose the one comfort we can take from this week’s events, is that some of us are lucky enough to live in a society based on Western values, because in countries like America you can’t imagine a lunatic ever going berserk with a gun in a public place. READ MORE Follow the Paris shootings live 'One million copies' of Charlie Hebdo to be be published #JESUISCHARLIE HASHTAG USED ACROSS THE WORLD One way in which we’re ensuring we protect those values, is by demanding all Muslims denounce the gunmen. It’s true that every Muslim leader in Britain has denounced them several times, but that’s hardly sufficient. They might denounce them at five past three, and then again at twenty past three, but what are they doing in between? For all we know they’re blowing themselves up at bus garages. So to truly distance themselves from the shooting, every Muslim should have to draw their own satirical cartoon involving Muhammad trampolining on a pig, so we know we can trust them. Similarly, when the Norwegian Christian Anders Breivik committed his massacre, all decent people marched straight down to the church and yelled "oy vicar, why haven’t you issued a statement condemning the shooting"? And politicians insisted Special Branch must infiltrate every C of E jumble sale to prevent similar radical movements growing throughout Surrey. When Newcastle gunman Raoul Moat went crazy, I’m sure I remember interviewers, callers on phone-in shows and website forums insisting it was up to so-called moderate Geordies to denounce these atrocities, and X Factor started that week with Louis Walsh saying he wouldn’t take part unless Cheryl Cole condemned this "foul evil act of pure foul evil, carried out by her own people". Nigel Farage has concluded the murders in Paris prove there’s a “fifth column” seeking to destroy us from within, adding “On a cultural level, what price anybody who is a stand-up comic, a cartoonist, a newspaper columnist, who wants to say something critical about Islam at all?” This is a fair point, because it’s hard to think of a single newspaper that at any time has ever said anything critical about Islam isn’t it? The Daily Mail for example is virtually a tabloid version of The Koran, and reading The Sun is like watching a Bin Laden video with added ****. Out in rural Kent, where Nigel Farage is standing to be MP, it’s just Allah Allah Allah all day long. You try buying a buttered scone in Broadstairs during Ramadan. The claim that Farage and many others appear to make is that Islam is inevitably violent, to which others reply that it’s a religion of peace, with each side quoting chunks of religious text to make their case. But this probably doesn’t help to settle the argument, as every religion’s holy book is a chaotic mixture. The Old Testament is like an episode of The Sopranos written by someone on crack, with prophets murdering children for calling them "baldhead" and nations destroyed with locusts. But most of us can pass a church without thinking "we should deport those loonies, they want to turn you into a pillar of salt". Because Christianity can be interpreted in any way you like. You can be a Christian and believe that means you should be generous, peaceful, modest and love thy neighbour. Or you can be a Christian and be a Tony Blair. There’s room for everyone. The same could be true of all faiths, its followers ranging from the heroic to the despicable, all of them justifying their actions by finding the relevant quote in their holy text. So the most logical response to any supposedly religious act is to respond to the act and not the religion. But there is one other possibility that’s been overlooked. Maybe the murderers are confused by the British government’s attitude towards crazy Islamic gunmen, which has appeared inconsistent. Not long ago President Assad of Syria, whose record for madness and violence is exemplary, was invited by the Prime Minister to stay at Buckingham Palace. And the rulers of Saudi Arabia, who recently got through 19 executions in one month, are sold billions of pounds worth of weapons. So maybe the gunmen’s strategy was to prove how mental they were, thinking they’d then be invited for biscuits with The Queen, and then be asked to do a deal for a tank. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/charlie-hebdo-how-exactly-would-we-like-muslims-to-condemn-these-attacks-9966176.html |
|
|
|
Edited by
makenwallo
on
Mon 01/12/15 04:58 AM
|
|
Muslim terrorists act more like Muhammad than peaceful Muslims want to admit. Sure, Muhammad wrote peaceful stuff in the Quran when he was lacked military muscle and was camped out in Medina. However, once he had formed his army, Muhammad used the sword to force Arabs to submit to him and to his religion. Taking control of the state meant that Muhammad could add to the Quran statements that modern-day Muslim terrorists cite as justification for their terrorism. Muhammad used physical force to scare people into submission. Modern-day Muslim terrorists have the same goal. After all, "Islam" means "submission".* *The meaning of the word "Islam" is something that I learned in a college "Islam" course that I took during the 1980s. The theologian who taught it was a Muslim from Saudi Arabia. Last issue of the Journal (Charlie Hebdo) French before the attack. . . .. Was talking about the "Islamization" of France where it appears on the cover of a number of fortune tellers, he says: "In 2015 my teeth will fall in 2022 will fast of Ramadan," referring to that Islam has become the largest religion in France in 2022 with solutions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQatNYC0R5k&feature=share |
|
|
|
http://youtu.be/BdtxHEIbeZE Taking away people's right to free will and self actualisation by nullifying religion is not a solution to ending war.. Many religions are peace loving and serve as a moral guide to do good and do no harm ... Dangerous minds .. Inciting fear and war ... using religion as a scapegoat to justify cowardly acts of terrorism is the problem... agree. but this video contains content from SME, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds. |
|
|
|
Well it seems the terrorists are winning because even in a topic about peace people are still arguing. Whatever your religion, race, colour, creed, beliefs or anything else, this madness, hate, and murder has to stop. agree .every person has the right to live in peace rights are not just given, they have to constantly be fought for... look at our own history, blacks, immagrants, even gays, they are still fighting for rights... and look at some of the rights that have been taken away from us because of the muslims... many peoples around the world say that homosexuals against human nature. i hope to see animals gays someday |
|
|
|
I still don't get the meaning of the cartoon of Mohammad looking in a mirror and exclaiming 'Blasphemy!' One would think Mohammad never looked in a mirror before, but that's not true. How would he have shaved himself without one? If anybody thinks there were no mirrors in the 7th century, perhaps they should contemplate the words of James the brother of Jesus in the Bible, who lived half a millennium earlier. (James 1: 23+24) sort of a Take-Off on the relative recent injunction against depicting the Prophet,that still has some Scholars wondering! this is just an Opinion by the Writer,but it seems to be a reasonable one,based on Facts! http://www.newsweek.com/koran-does-not-forbid-images-prophet-298298?piano_d=1 So Conrad73, what 'facts' about Mohammad are we so familiar with, more than 14 hundred years since he was on Earth. Don't count on the Quran to say anything infamous. Like I've said in the past, Mohammad isn't mentioned as many times in the Quran as I can count on one hand. Since when is a reflection an idolatrous image? If a reflection is idolatrous... Who could do so little as look in a pool of water? Why are you Guys so humorless? It's called Satire! Statement from the Ayatollah Khomeini: Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. . . . But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world. . . . Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers]? Islam says: Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until overcome us? Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender [to the enemy]? Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for the Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other psalms and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all this mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim. "An Islamic regime must be serious in every field," explained Ayatollah Khomeini. "There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam." Look no further for your Million! Nicolas Anelka has been sentenced to 40 years in prison. The former French international was guilty of having eaten a sacred cow at a barbecue with friends. The AFP has confirmed information: Nicolas Anelka, the former striker of the team of France Football, has been sentenced to 40 years in prison for eating a sacred cow in India at a barbecue with friends. The player and his friends were arrested after a denunciation came from its neighbors. They were immediately tried and will each serve a sentence of 40 years in prison and pay a fine of 1,500 rupees (170 euros). Player of Mumbai City FC will not appeal his conviction, Indian law does not allow a stranger to appeal. If the French government does not request extradition of the player, there is a good chance that the player serve the entire sentence in India, the prison Mimi Siku of Delhi. Nicolas Anelka request support gouvernenemt Counsel for the player requested government support as soon as possible: “The only crime that committed Nicolas Anelka is the not knowing the culture of the country in which it is located. Nicolas thought it was the guinea pig that was not the sacred cow in India. I seek help from the government, not for the football but what the French compatriot Nicolas Anelka. ” The French government should communicate in the week about his position. According to our sources, it is not certain that the extradition is requested. Source : footballfrance.fr http://www.anonymousmags.com/nicolas-anelka-sentenced-40-years-prison-eating-sacred-cow-india/ |
|
|
|
are there some who do not yet sea all super powers work together for the greater good... and even dear old Russia has agreed to help cleanse the world of the terrorist. it is not about country against country any longer, or nation against nation any longer, nor has it been for many a time. for all nations have mutually agreed to rally and fight against the duly recognized terrorist. the east and the west have the same grand good agenda. and it seems we shall soon even be successful at cowing old kim jong un into good agreement. then, order. and we cleanse the world of ALL the vipers, before they get a chance to strike the innocents. cleanse the world of all those who demanded respect for them self, and so wished to destroy all those who didn't respect their beliefs and religions and demands, instead of seaing that, must be earned. a pence for wheat, and two pence for barely, and pay the grim reapers. respect u have a wise opinions |
|
|
|
Topic:
does this work
|
|
User Deactivated
|
|
|
|
Well it seems the terrorists are winning because even in a topic about peace people are still arguing. Whatever your religion, race, colour, creed, beliefs or anything else, this madness, hate, and murder has to stop. Got actually banned out of a Thread by an OP at another Site for pointing out that Fake-Gaza-Picture! sorry everybody to view these pics |
|
|
|
Well it seems the terrorists are winning because even in a topic about peace people are still arguing. Whatever your religion, race, colour, creed, beliefs or anything else, this madness, hate, and murder has to stop. agree .every person has the right to live in peace |
|
|
|
Arrow is mis-directed. Should point to Hamas. seems the Syrian ISIS,where that Picture originated must be thinking so! Gaza from Palestine. must eliminate all forms of terrorism Get rid of @#%&Hamas then! unfortunately this is only a small part. i know the media are hiding these facts there |
|
|
|
Arrow is mis-directed. Should point to Hamas. seems the Syrian ISIS,where that Picture originated must be thinking so! Gaza from Palestine. must eliminate all forms of terrorism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the Muslim man who has been hailed a hero after he hid shoppers in the freezer of the Jewish grocery store after an Islamic gunman raided the deli where he worked. Lassana Bathily, 24, originally from Mali in west Africa, guided terrified customers to safety in a supermarket chiller at the Hyper Cacher supermarket in Porte de Vincennes, Paris, yesterday. He has since been praised for his quick-thinking and bravery after 15 hostages, which reportedly included two children, escaped the ordeal, in which gunman Amedy Coulibaly was killed as he attempted to flee. Four of the hostages were killed before police stormed the building and ended the terror. Mr Bathily, who reportedly led six people to safety, told BFMTV: 'When they ran down, I opened the door [of the freezer]. 'There are several people who came to me. I turned off the light, I turned off the freezer. When I turned off the cold, I put them [hostages] in, I closed the door, I told them to stay calm.' Using a goods lift he escaped and was able to give the police valuable information about what was happening inside and where the hostages were hiding. Shy and reluctant to tell his story, Mr Bathily, who went to school in Paris, admitted that after the shoot-out many of the customers came to shake his hand and thank him for what he did. Today his picture – labelled Malian Muslim – has been tweeted around the world as a symbol of the good of people united against terrorism, and there have been calls for him to be awarded the French Medal of Honour for his bravery. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2903829/Saved-hiding-FREEZER-Thirty-Jewish-shoppers-avoided-taken-hostage-kosher-deli-shutting-cold-storage-huddling-stay-warm.html?ito=social-facebook |
|
|
|
Topic:
delete account
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Delete
|
|
|
|
Topic:
something different
|
|
|
|
|
|
You would be able to change their lives and marry a Russian? American girls Will get angry |
|
|
|
Edited by
makenwallo
on
Sun 12/28/14 05:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|