100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > FenemRespice
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
Frankly I think you are too introspective for Nineteen. Especially for posting on a dating site, but then this site is way more than just a dating site. Why not just live a little and let your more natural instincts have a chance. You might find it alot easier to make your decisions once you have experienced life a little more. Are you afraid to make a mistake? Is having committed a sin so awfully difficult to cope with that you might consider living in some kind of Shell or Bubble your whole life? Just a few questions. Swank, questions to answer. My philosophy is, I'll have plenty of time to live life, far better than this, once I die, now I need to focus on getting tho where I want to be spiritual. And I'm so introspective because that's where my heart and mind are, and those are, what I consider, the links to God and also my communications center to Him. It helps that being introspective is how I was trained, or as some would call it, raised. The was I see it, 'living life' is what brings me a child at the age of 18 (or at a younger age) and who knows what else. So, I don't think I'll be living life just yet. And sure, perhaps doing so would make my decisions easier, but it's the aftermath I'm worried about. And yes, I'm not a fan of failure, in fact, I fear failure, so I'm going to do everything I can to prevent failure. No, I don't consider perfection not failing. And my 'shell' has yet to fail me, only when I drop it and let emotions have a say, that is when complications arise. However, my shell doesn't extent to certain pleasures and sensual preferences such at biting, bondage, WAM and various other fetishes that you probably won't find with someone choosing to live in a bubble. I know this is off the original topic, but I feel it's vital to the core of the problem, which I think I've gotten a hold of. Emotions. Yup, those pesky little things. I like controlling them, diverting them to other places and using them when they are necessary, or I need some energy. By control I don't mean bottle up, I just convert emotional energy to a generic energy which I can focus in other areas. So, comments and questions on that? I'd like to know what Drago01 thinks about that. I like your post, Drago01, that's why I ask you're opinion, thank you for joining the discussion. I haven't posted here in a while so this is prety much a ranting outlet, that's the emotional energy being re-directed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
While the ten commandments are an excellent start, that is still part of the old law. Jesus, in affect, replaced that with his two great Commandments of 'Love thy lord your God with all you're heart mind and soul,' and 'Love thy neighbor as thy self'. At least, that's how I see it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
That's one of the many points of this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
And you're right, it is beyond my right to expect you to change your perseption of an issue, with heated debade I mean to show a point of perception that may not have been seen before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
So who said I don't see that? Death is an inevitable ends to life, thus mainting the balenence of the univerce. The only unpreventable causes of death are some deseases and old age. And once our country get's past this moral blockade on cloning and genetic engineering, (granted I know we see some genetic engineering as acceptable) aging will be a thing of the past. Eternal youth just boild down to removing the or slowing the cells capability of destroying itself. Yes yes, easyer said than done. The point is, I realy don't want that to happon untill we find a way off this rock, otherwise, it's starvation, not old age, that would kill us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
You are for the choice of and operation which ends in the death, or near death as some posters have mention, of a child. That's the procedure. I commend you for your choice of have the child, no ifs ands or buts about it. By association and logical conclusion, if you are for the allowing of this choice, you have to accept the end result the the allowing of that choice will cause. Unless of course you disagree, which is fully within your right. But it is just as much within my right to ask why you would take one without the other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
Sure do, and I'm working on those one day at a time, I just like it when people own up to their beliefs, that includes me. I'm pro Choice so I have to contend with saying it's alright for a mother, if she chooses to, to kill her unborn or partial born child. I have an unreasonable expectancy for others to own up to that same decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
look, like I said in my first post, I'm pro-choice Anti-abortion, but I still accept that by being pro-choice, I'm am for the choice of killing a baby, and that's my beef. Pro-choiceers who don't understand that they are for the choice of killing a baby. or perhaps understand is not the right term, perhaps they don't like thinking about it like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
I want to talk about why people can't at least admit that when they are pro-choice, they are for the choice of killing a baby. But you guys got off topic when you started the whole think about sex before marriage and protection and whatnot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
okay, goody, goody, goody, just saying, I plan on waiting for marge for sex, but I'm old fashioned and what not. anywhoo, this is getting a smidgen of my topic, but who cares. I think most of the problems would be resolved if we would just control are emotions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
Rationalize what exactly, and how are you comparing me rationalizing emotions, something that's very logical and has yet to steer me wrong, to unprotected sex with HIV? Besides, rationalizing it is what led me to how wrong this addiction is. I should have started rationalizing this from the beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
It has to do with the sub-topic debate of weather or not there is a universal right and wrong, like, my reasons for the acceptable killing of another human is different from a Jehadist. In my opinion that shifts the write and wrong to a different place. but that's just my feelings on right and wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
But you have to think of the language at the time. Up until recently, men meant the human race.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
very very true, and that is what I consider write and wrong, but that is not necessarily true for everyone. I mean, I feel it's wrong to kill, unless in self defense, where as Jihadists feel it is right to kill those not of their faith. I consider that a prety big difference in right and wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
While I wouldn't argue that in the least, just be prepared for the argument of the rights of the mother. Does the right of the baby trump the right of the baby? But that's not what I'm arguing. I'm just saying, you are for the choice of an operation that kills the child, or is design to kill the child. I just would like the pro-choicers to admit that. but that's me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
Well, about two day's ago, I'd come to the conclusion that this thing is wrong, completely, and I need to initiate some serious emotional restriction, which I have, and deal with this situation. Also, I don't understand how you can agree that people have different morals, yet posses the same views of right and wrong. Don't morals determine what you see as write and wrong? Okay, the terrorists who rape and kill people that are not their own, but demand fairness for their people, I just see that as hypocritical. The only ultimate right and wrongs that I can relay think of, for me personally, is loving God with all my heart, mind, body, and soul and loving my neighbor as myself. But even that is different from person to person. Perhaps if you told me some of the rights and wrongs that are universal, I could see where you're coming from. Let's face it, I'm thick when it comes to this subject, I just can't see a universal set of right and wrongs that everyone can hold true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
I can explain to you the reason one name is used above the other. Obviously you are pro abortion because you said you are. Being pro choice means that you believe each woman has the right to choose to not abort or abort. That is the difference. A woman or man for that matter can be pro choice for all and not be pro abortion in their own lives. I hope that helps Alright, that's honestly the best explanation I've heard, however, I still go back to, you are for the choice of a mother to kill her baby. And what makes you think a law will make Abortion any less prevalent.. Just look at abortion, or the border. We had and have laws on those things, but look at what we really have. What makes you think this will be any different. If anything, It will make the situation worse. Women will still want abortions, so they will try on their own, or go to a dingy back-alley underground clinic where they could get kill along with the baby. And I’m not braging so much as saying if you’re going to have a belief, you need to have it with the good and the bad. That’s what this really boils down to. Andin my experience, most pro-choicers get all up in arms if you suggest that they are pro-abortion, let alone pro-babykiller. Obviously, I’m not going to go out and tell women to get abortions, but I still think they have the right to choose, that keeping with the mindset that God has ultimate judgment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
Okay, what I’m just asking of spider is if he thinks that everyone has the same morals. While I don’t disagree that we have similar morals, I would debate any two people having the exact same moral beliefs. Second, I don’t think that I’m better than anyone, I hope I don’t come across that way. In fact, I believe this whole challenge with lust and desire I’m having is meant to humble me and show me I don’t have as much control over my sin as I thought or would like to have. And when I say I don’t want to ask for forgiveness, what I’m saying is, I want to actively push sin away and not sin as much so I don’t have to ask for as much forgiveness as I would if I were complacent. I think that trying to stop myself from sinning or actively sinning less would make God happy. Is my faith incorrect in thinking that? By faith I mean my personal belief, not my church. Also, in what ways do you feel I need to grow spiritually? I’m curious so I can better look at those areas and perhaps fix them.
I’m well aware that the what the world holds as true is often sin, I’ve been aware of that for quite some time. That is exactly why I kill myself to the world on a daily basis. I’m just struggling with this addiction. I feel that dying to the world is an important part of faith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Abortion
|
|
So, let me just get this out first, if you haven't read any of my other posts, I'm Methodist, which is a denomination of Protestantism, the other half of Christianity. With that in mind, I'm one of those Christians that's a big fan of acceptance. In fact, there's not much I won't be accepting of. Yes yes, where is this going. I have a question for people that are pro-choice, or pro abortion. Whatever you prefer. Why can't you just admit that's it is pro-abortion, or, how I say it, pro-baby-killing. Let's throw this little curve ball. I'm Pro-abortion. Oh Snap!
I'm willing to admit, I'm pro-babykilling. I think women have the right to kill her baby. That's her decision. Would I try to convince my wife or girlfriend to go through with the birth, you bet I would, but I don't feel I have the right to do that with other women. This has become a political issue, of course, because it has to do with the government enforcing a law. I'm for smaller government whenever it comes to anything that doesn't have to do National Security. That's another reason for my view, but it bugs me when pro-choicers won't admit that they are for abortion. That goes to my question hidden in the first paragraph. To all of the Pro-choice people, other than 'because it sounds bad', why can't you just admit that you are pro-babykilling. We are for the procedure which kills babies. We're not for limiting, or shutting it down, we are for the free choice of killing her unborn. So come on people, own up to your beliefs. Oh, and before you pose me with this little hypothetical: "How would you feel if your mom aborted you?" or something of the like, my answer will always be 'I WOULDN'T, I'D BE DEAD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Moral Conundrum
|
|
wow, lots of things to respond to. firs of, because I'm stupids and can't do the whole quotes thing, I'll try to make sense. Spidercmb, am I understanding correctly, you feel that everyone has the exact same morals? because that's kind of what I was thinking. Because, in my previous example about Gay mirage and abortion sort of disproves that.
Second, yes, when I love a person, I want to be with them, hence the lust, however, I have to love someone before that happens, which leads me to what Britty was saying. Personally, I think lust and desires is a matter of semantics and connotation, but that's just me. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
