Is Trump a Dem?

lol.

all those resources he was born into and didn't even get beyond third grade vocabulary. Pretty unbelievable.

I put "American Way' in quotes to signify that it is JUST words that are cliche and simplistic and not rooted in the reality of things.

"Get her done" is another cliche phrase, being that the 'her' that is being done or that one thinks should be done is also not a monolithic set of issues that each American agrees on.

All countries want to 'get her done'. We are really not so unique in that. We just have different things we are referring to when we use the phrase, that depend on our culture, government and history.

'The American Way' is a pretty nice but pretty useless cliche. America has as many 'ways' as it has Americans.

I dont know what BLM has to do with Trump. But no one is in every place addressing everything that happens everywhere in every moment.


The last POTUS was re elected, served the maximum allowed under the Constitution, led the country AWAY from depression. There is no historical standard under which that will ever be classified as 'failure.'

like all POTUS some of their 'promises'(campaign assertions where they rarely ever use the word PROMISE in connection to anything but what they are able under the constitution to do) will see light of day and others will not.

Trump is no different.
Obama was no different.

his very very big third grade ego and vocabulary do annoy.

That is a silly accusation that has no quantitative evidence to support it.

our POTUS says enough insensitive things all on his own, regardless of what 'democrats' allegedly do.

I think the hoops are well called for, for the mere fact of the GAIN to be had, having authority that is SUPREME over the lives of others, and a pay of a quarter mill a year FOR LIFE>

Im glad we have a SCOTUS in our judicial branch of the government.

I am not sure we can call anything 'embarassing' anymore with a straight face. There is just to much juvenile, bullying and insensitive speech becoming our 'norm', that the line of 'embarassing' has become at best a very jagged and hard to define one.

The FBI should do a 40 year background check on every member of Congress and every federal judge and see who's left standing!

hhhhmmmmmm......

I guess the proof IS in the pudding,isnt it?

please... the UN is a fail organization that contribute absolutely nothing.

those who laughed are the Left socialist countries that trump screwed over in order to put america and its interests and its real allies first.

hate or love the the guy he did more than hussein barack obama did in his entire 8 years if office, he accomplish all of that despite the FAR left in deep state that do anything to make him fail.


while trump want to prevent MS 13 to rape and kill more 12 years olds girls..
hillary want to open the southern border so more illegal immigrants will have opportunities to ruin the lire of entire families and life of girls.

the left is sick and it's about time an american president stand for americans!

PS: im not an american.. i just respect the country too much to let a stupid trump bash go without a proper response.

have a good day

Here's the way it is, Nothing has been proven or disproven. If they go ahead and confirm him now without concrete evidence proving him innocent, They will once again be screwing themselves.

The way most people will look at it, they are railroading him in. Right now there is a big black cloud of doubt hanging over this guy. Confirming now is the same thing as saying it's OK. A justice is supposed to be beyond reproach. But without a full investigation, no one will ever really know.

If they confirm him now without all the evidence in, It will be seen as a Republican-led coverup.

so people honestly think democrats paid her back in 2013 to go see a shrink about this impact on her life?

And democrats paid her when she decided to write a letter to her congress person?

I wonder how democrats found out about her, since Kavanaugh himself claims he never really knew her that well. After all, he never wrote his name on her calendar ...lol

Magazine of Jesuits urges withdrawal of Kavanaugh nomination

"ROME (AP) — The magazine of the Jesuit religious order in the United States has publicly withdrawn its endorsement of Judge Brett Kavanaugh as Supreme Court justice following testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee by the Jesuit-educated Kavanaugh and the woman accusing him of sexually assaulting her decades ago".

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/magazine-jesuit-order-withdraws-kavanaugh-endorsement-58143159

What would she have to gain by telling this to her shrink SIX years ago?

What would she have to gain by asking for confidentiality?

Why would she need to be coached on what she has already repeated many times before being called to testify?

see what you want. No one has proven her to be not credible. The details, her education and career level and prestige, her very clear and consistent answers, and her OWN call and request for an INVESTIGATION of her claims, , her willingness to be subject to a lie detector point much more to credibility than anything else.

SHE has been an open and cooperative book, unlike others.

Does being drunk make one a whore? Seems like Kavanaugh would fit the bill?

Has there been any statement that Blasey Ford was drunk at the time of the alleged incident?

and why is it so easy to call teens whores, but grown women who make the choice to attend playboy parties and go to bedrooms with married men credible victims?

I don't consider any female involved in drinking a whore anymore than I do a man. and I dont consider any female involved in sex a whore anymore than I do a man. Obviously, I dont consider any female mixing drinking and sex a whore anymore than I do a man.

I know there are alot of people making accusations about alot of other people. Maybe all that matters is they consider themself a victim, maybe it matters just as much if the intent was to victimize the.

I any case, I think all should be given the opportunity to explain their claims of what happened to them and let those paid or given the responsibility to judge decide if they believe it on its merit, like with Cosby.

Tucker Carlson, who I am no fan of, is being accused of victim blaming

Referring to the attention that Blasey’s allegation has received ― including Sen. Mazie Hirono’s message that the men in this country should “just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change” ― Carlson said that victims of sexual abuse should rely on due process and avoid having “trial by CNN.”

“It’s pretty straightforward. If you believe a crime has been committed against you, you report it,” he said. “Go to the police. It’s not always easy, obviously, but it’s still your obligation as a citizen, not least to protect the rest of us from whomever you believe did it.”
http://www.yahoo.com/news/tucker-carlson-blames-sexual-assault-034939642.html

as an assault survivor, I feel he makes a good point. I dont know that I would stretch it to being an 'obligation as a citizen', however I do believe the justice system can only act when it is given the REASON and the information to act upon. And with consensual and alternate sex being within the individual's rights to engage in, it is difficult to prove things like the presence or absence of such consent, what constituted consent, or what we can assume someone may or may not have consented to.

These things are difficult to prove when it is reported quickly, let alone when it is left for years or decades.

I dont think this woman was seeking justice on a teen TRYING to 'get some', especially since there was drinking involved and the attempt is not detailed much beyond that, and it happened decades ago. I think she just wanted the character of a potential SCOTUS to be investigated more deeply.


In any case, I agree that reporting these things is important to try to prevent it from happening to others, but I understand why it is pointless in many cases to do so without clearer evidence of an actual 'crime'.


Is it an 'obligation' to report crime? Is it understandable if one does not believe it can be proven or that it will cause danger to themselves, to leave the battle for another day?

tell that to the Cosby accusers

time will tell .. meanwhile, I will research more out of interest to the details of the claim and the timeline of the complaint

Seems like much ado about nothing, on both sides, until the actual INFORMATION is released on what allegedly took place, unless I missed that part ....

while both sides judge the accusation, can anyone point out WHAT that accusation is/was?