Community > Posts By > Guitarjizzard
Topic:
Zombies
|
|
i cant decide whether directors purposely make zombie movies cheesy as hell or are they just ferking inept. Of all movie genres, this sub genre has to be the worst. Is it the low budgets or complete lack of effort or care? Even the higher budget ones like Resident Evil and I am Legend left lots to be desired. RE1 was decent but went to crap fast. I hope RE: Extinction means just that- the last one they make.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Who's viewd me!
|
|
good thing i have the excuse that i deleted some. i think my all time high was like 28
|
|
|
|
if it became an actual sport, that would change my mind
|
|
|
|
thats a strawman argument. I never said anything about effort or how real pain is.
"It may take serious skill and athleticism but by definition, can not be a sport. When outcomes are pre-arranged, it then becomes drama and theater" |
|
|
|
lets throw u in the ring and have u take some of that beatings they get..and then tell me its not a sport. Im way too badd ass honey. Besides your gullibility has no relevance on whats a sport or not. Im truly sorry but (actually no im not) its fake and therefor theatre. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Would you bang
|
|
no marriage for me. premarital sex is way too fun
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Your gonna die in a week
|
|
id be like "**** it, whatever; hope if doesnt suck on the other side" i guess id start begging women for sex
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Would you bang
|
|
what ever work you need done
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Guitarjizzard
on
Thu 02/28/08 01:29 AM
|
|
It may take serious skill and athleticism but by definition, can not be a sport. When outcomes are pre-arranged, it then becomes drama and theater.
|
|
|
|
Youd figure in a world so gung ho on politically correctness, this wouldnt even be up for discussion. and yet... You bring it up! you confused me with the rest of the world |
|
|
|
Yes, it was called the one-drop rule. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule nothing like former racist ideology to placate the social masses of today |
|
|
|
for people that like quotes from wiki:
"Obama was born in Honolulu to a black Kenyan father and a white American mother." This means, regardless of all other declarations here, by the US census, or wiki, he is multi racial. That means he is not black. He is not white. He is both. Youd figure in a world so gung ho on politically correctness, this wouldnt even be up for discussion. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Guitarjizzard
on
Sat 02/09/08 10:27 PM
|
|
oh ok i see now. white is like cottage cheese and tastes the flavor of what is mixed with it. Doesnt seem to be a real race unless its pure. Dammit all to hell...my mother and father arent considered native american but my great grandmother was. Guess im way too white to capitalize on the minority status of my native american heritage.
|
|
|
|
When you register a child for school, that is how they do it. Then the school shows what percentage black and what percentage white, etc. that the school has. pardon me, but i didnt ask how schools conduct racial categorization. I asked for the rulebook article detailing exactly how having an arbitrary amount of black ancestry automatically classifies one, ipso facto, as black. |
|
|
|
well in this country, like it or not, race does have somthing to do with many things. My question wasnt a matter of race per se, but one of polemics.
|
|
|
|
If you are half black, you are still considered black. who made up this rule? is it in the human handbook somewhere? |
|
|
|
The correct answer is who gives a sh1t. nope. thats your answer. dont confuse the two. |
|
|
|
Hes mix of both white and black. He belongs in the "other" category.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
911 truth movement
|
|
Have you considered the impact of the two planes that hit the building? That's bound to have jarred the structure all the way to the basement sort of like a mini earth quake. And I bet if only one plane had hit only one tower engineers would have found structural damage to the other tower. Yes. Besides, may buildings survive earthquakes with millions of times the amount of energy of either the impacts or collapse. I pointed out in an earlier post that the Oklahoma City bombing had a THOUSAND FOLD the energy than either impact. Guess what, that building didnt fall down. Besides, its been stated (even by JOM article) that it could support lateral loads several times what the planes impact produced. The super redundant design of the towers could possibly handle several impacts actually. THe problem is what exactly was the cause here? Fire has never taken down a steel frame building in history. THis isnt to say its impossible by any means but it DOES set a precendent for steel framed buildings. So the impacts and resulting fire in and of themselves probably didnt cause the collapse but the combined events contributed to the joists giving way (a design inadequacy) and birth of the pancake theory. Seems plausible, Id think, to even to madisonman and Id have no problem myself accepting that if it wasnt for 7WT. THeres simply no easy way to convince me that 7 didnt fall disturbingly similar to how Dan Rather called it on that day. |
|
|
|
Topic:
911 truth movement
|
|
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html I made many of these points earlier but was (dis)regarded as a "regurgitation of Alex Jones". As the link suggests, the fire wasnt hot enough to bring down the towers. The way it suggests WTC 1 & 2 fell is plausible but Ive never argued what did or didnt bring those 2 down. One point of contention is how hot the fires actually were due to the burning jet fuel. This link claims upwards of 1200F where as others state half that amount. http://www.mepetroleum.com/jet_fuel.htm However, the JOM article does lend credence to the orthodox explanation for the collapse of both towers. Too bad it doesnt help with my skepticism on 7 World Trade. I still believe Venusians beamed death rays on it. |
|
|