The topic is excessive.
Three different cops used a tazer on the man. Is that excessive? Why didn't they just wrestle him down?
If there was only the one cop and his tazer didn't stop the suspect and the suspect punched the cop would it be excessive to shoot the suspect to stop him from causing more harm to the cop?
Where is the line between excessive force and necessary force?

Why didn't he just use a tazer?
Maybe because they don't always work. Good thing there was more than one cop there. How many tazers would be considered excessive?

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=904803882866429&id=100000104773706

What fun would that be.
I mean who doesn't like picking what parts of "evidence" they want to believe in order to push their agenda. And yes I'm guilty of it also.

Well since we are picking and choosing what we want to believe. Should we consider this?

Wilson then noticed the pair were carrying cigars, and had heard the report of the robbery and recognized the pair as possible suspects.
“And he’s looking at them and they got something in their hands and it looks like it could be what, you know, those cigars or whatever. So he goes in reverse back to them,” Josie said.
Wilson, she said, “tries to get out of his car. They slam his door shut violently. I think he said Michael did. And then he opened the car again. He tried to get out. He stands up.
“And then Michael just bum-rushes him and shoves him back into his car. Punches him in the face and then Darren grabs for his gun. Michael grabbed for the gun. At one point he got the gun entirely turned against his hip. And he shoves it away. And the gun goes off,” Josie said.
“Well, then Michael takes off and gets to be about 35 feet away. And Darren’s first protocol is to pursue. So he stands up and yells, ‘Freeze!’ Michael and his friend turn around. And Michael taunts him … And then all the sudden he just started bum-rushing him. He just started coming at him full speed,” she told the station.

“So [Wilson] really thinks [Brown] was on something, because he just kept coming. It was unbelievable. And so he finally ended up, the final shot was in the forehead, and then he fell about two to three feet in front of the officer,” she said.

This was from someone who claimed to have talked to Wilson.

How is it a false equivalency?
It shows how different cultures react to basically the same overuse of force by police just the race of shooter and victim are reversed.
And I don't recall hearing overuse of deadly force in Ferguson.

The video in the store was released because the media wanted it. Now if Wilson is arrested that video can't be used by the defense. So it must not be relevant to the case. But the media sure ran with it.

“You will see on camera … the actions of everyone involved, including up to the point where our officer utilizes deadly force and his response thereafter,”

He said the video, along with the officer’s identity, will be released at the “appropriate” time, adding it could be days, weeks or months.

“It would be wholly inappropriate to take the most vital piece of evidence that we have and put it out to the public prior to the officer having some due process,”

That is right out of the mouth of the police chief. They have already released more than that in the Brown case. Maybe due to the investigation they can't release more info.

Is it special treatment? Or is it standard protocol of the police departments during an investigation?
All the info put out in both case weren't released by the police department. It was found by the media and released by the media.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2014/08/black-cop-kills-white-man-media-hide-race/

You want details about the officer in the Brown case. Why not this one?

Modern training?
They have some of the most extensive firearms training there is.
When posed with a threat you are traing to stop the threat.
You aim center mass because an arm or leg shot isn't alwYs going to stop the threat. Every situation is different. It's easy to Monday morning quarter back every situation and point out different ways it could have been handled. Until you are put in a situation where you need to stop a threat in my opinion your opinion doesn't count.

And you know first hand that that's how Wilson was trained?
I don't believe any cop is trained to first pull out their gun.

So he was well trained how not to be a bad cop.

I read that earlier. Wilson had a clean record with that department. Just because there are bad officers in a department doesn't mean they are all bad cops.
I believe I also read that the chief said Wilson was a good officer but that's not stated in the OP. If he was corrupt or had a bad record with that department I find it hard to believe he could have gotten a job as a cop anywhere.

Fixed it

And that's the ONLY evidence there is?
You can't pick and chose what evidence you use and what evidence you overlook.

And some have already made a choice to find the officer guilty of murder before any evidence has proven that.

And how do you know those keeping guns in the home aren't properly trained?

So claiming to have punched someone out is defamation?
Obama should resign and sue all those who have said worse about him. GWB I'm sure would have several hundred lawsuits. Sara Palin, Mitt Romney, Joe Biden...... Need I go on? They've all had way worse things said of them.
In my opinion it was a frivolous law suit.

Itike I said Ventura is never. Mentioned by name.
Just what was said in an interview. One mans word against another.
If what Kyle said on oreilly wasn't true then Ventura had no need to sue.
After all we all know everything on Fox News is a lie right.

I don't get it. The book doesn't mention Ventura by name.
What ever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones but name will never hurt me.
Ventura should have been the bigger man and dropped the lawsuit after Kyle's death.