lol i live in canada and its been fine fer wemen to do that for quite some time now and i hate to be judgemental but it never turns out as good as you might like. only the ones you dont realy want to see take it all off. the ones who you do want to see prefer to tease you insted :D. furthermore iv been a guys fer many years and have yet to feel the need to take my shirt off in public forums though i supose if i was one of thoses muscle bound dudes i might, but i cant say as i need to in order to remain cool enough.

dnot be jueaols of my selplnig :D fnnuy how its sitll raedbale inst it :D

in general men are atracted to looks more then wemen. wemen tend to be biologicaly atracted to cirtian personality traits most often found in confidance, personal authority, humor, inteligance, decisiveness, ect..

if you have to ask its generaly not a good sign

k-w here

statisticaly speekin when wemen are asked what is the most important consideration when looking for a life partner or husband 83 % reply financial consideration is the most important.

k-w :)

shovel faster or demand tim hortons delivery service morning canada

mornin all

simple answer dont get married in the first place its jst a legal piece of paper that now a days causes the common man far to many problems and u can have a good relationship without those

yep oldsage i know there is no way to get around the fact that buisness owne the gov't no matter who u vote for so my question how do the real ppl ever get a real say when the only voteing choices is 2 people offered to us buy major compeating buisness faction. hopefully a whole gov't revolution will come soo with the whole inet contributer thing going on and one day someone is isnt on a corporate bank roll might actualy get a chance at running things. but wait even if that someone did get elected buy 80% to rule the country we still have to fill the HOUSE and senate with ppl who suport him. can we say not a chance :)

personaly i think the goverment needs to start taxing buy gross worth of a person therbuy makeing those that have large amounts pay large amounts and those that dont can stop paying altogether but paying taxes on purchaces isnt gona be a solution the rich will simply buy from china or w/e hide there purchaces threw companies and still nevr pay a pennie and the gov't will raise the tax rate witch will hit the middle class untill they get what they need regardless

lol old sage that is so the problem buisness write off need to start beeing eliminated as a whole and irs need to cramp down major on the buisnesses.

the devel is in the percent the rich save and invest a larger percent to make themselves richer this is not taxable under your system. and if i spend 30 k on a car as an average person its usaulay 25% of income over swveral year but if a guy who make 3mil a year spends 300k on a car its a drop in the bucket. and so the tax AFFECTS him less all you realy need to see to prove ma point is the fact that its part of a major republican agenda to know its not gona be good for the lower half.

lol hate to say it but putting the tax burden on purchaces as aposed to income is a "rich man idea" this is due to the fact that they spends a lower PERCENT of thier income on LIVEING and anything they spend on becomeing richer(investment) will continue to be right offable so a person who earns only 20k a year and has to spend it all still has to pay tax on it all but a person who makes a million and only spend 20k only has to pay taxes on the 20k and quite frankly those who make more should pay more. and the real solution is the major companies in the wrld need to actualy start paying taxes insed of defering and writeing off till they poay notheing. nother helpful solution might be to make an inheratace tax of about 90% and starting a regiem of u get to live what u work for insted of what u were born for. :)