100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
Okay so back to flirting styles. One of my friends used to catch his eyes and then be suggestive with her actions like putting the drink straw in her mouth or something like that. I used to crack up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I did and it in no way backs up the title of this thread. So misinformation that is fearmongering. everyone already knows about your and your fantasies...so, just keep on trying, someone might even believe you... 
Oh you mean believe you and your misinformation don't you? As in this thread. I have no reason to fear monger. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking and giving out a phone number in no way makes one a skank either.
How else are you supposed to get to know someone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I did and it in no way backs up the title of this thread.
So misinformation that is fearmongering. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually flirting doesn't make one a skank.
I really don't flirt. I have conversations that either go well and end in something happening like the exchange of number or they don't go well and end in nothing happening at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you read the site you can see it in no way resembles the title of this thread...lol
So it is fearmongering by altering the information enough to fit an agenda that the information doesn't back. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which not one can be blamed on the sitting president.
So I guess we are complaining about past presidents who made this all possible? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Love at first sight.
|
|
Do u believe in love at first sight? Does it really work? Some sample opinion says it work and some says it does not. What is your view everybody. Love at first sight is a myth. You can be strongly attracted to someone on sight. Filled with lust for them on sight. But we do not have enough information to even consider loving them on sight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dragoness
on
Sun 03/18/12 01:20 PM
|
|
More fearmongering garbage.
Talk about taking something and making it into something else, sheesh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
And Ron Paul..............
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
And Ron Paul..............
|
|
And in his lunatic state of mind he has his own "interpretation" of the constitution which isn't exactly correct either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are whole lotsa white racists in this country who do not believe they are racists....
It is easy for them to slip through without being called on it because this country was created by white racists. White racism is so much the norm here that people think it is right and just. Just like this man is most likely doing. He has supported Obama's policies when white guys did it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We dealt with humans so we dealt with all human issues. There are many many human issues. Exactly. Employees cannot be discriminated against for their race or their gender or their religious beliefs and practices. If the public they come into contact with does not like them for their being black or gay or Christian, they can, if they like, ask to deal with someone else. But, the employee cannot be told they have to change themselves in these specific areas. Individually that is so, but when you represent the government you represent an entity for all humans, meaning that you have to be respectful of all which means representing or showing no favor to any. Religions do not respect each other so they cannot be considered benign. If religions did not have the "we are the right ones and all others are wrong" philosophy they would be able to coexist without conflict but they don't and if they did, it would basically end the appeal of the religion in giving it's member superiority and all the perks of being "right" and "condoned by god". One of the things I liked about Wicca was that it does recognize all religions as being equal. Too bad no one else's feels the same. as much as i hate to say it, i agree with you... I know how you hate..... but this happens on occasion very often with different people I do believe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
The Downside of Being Alone
|
|
Loneliness is a state of mind. Being alone is a state of being.
I have come to the conclusion that like all other states of being or states of mind, we(some of us humans) choose to isolate either consciously or subconsciously to allow the mind to work through some issues it hasn't or didn't because of a busy time/stressful time/etc... in life. It sounds like you are working through them in this state of being alone. If like me, which is most unlikely by the way,  you will re-prioritize and reinsert yourself back into the social setting slowly in a better state of mind allowing for an even more fulfilling experience this go round.
But remembering to whom I am writing this, pessimist extraordinaire, maybe you will have a whole nuther result that I have no way of seeing because of my perspective. I just hope you do not dwell on the negative but look for the positive in the situation. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Last to post wins! - part 88
|
|
I haven't seen this post in forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We dealt with humans so we dealt with all human issues. There are many many human issues. Exactly. Employees cannot be discriminated against for their race or their gender or their religious beliefs and practices. If the public they come into contact with does not like them for their being black or gay or Christian, they can, if they like, ask to deal with someone else. But, the employee cannot be told they have to change themselves in these specific areas. Individually that is so, but when you represent the government you represent an entity for all humans, meaning that you have to be respectful of all which means representing or showing no favor to any. Religions do not respect each other so they cannot be considered benign. If religions did not have the "we are the right ones and all others are wrong" philosophy they would be able to coexist without conflict but they don't and if they did, it would basically end the appeal of the religion in giving it's member superiority and all the perks of being "right" and "condoned by god". One of the things I liked about Wicca was that it does recognize all religions as being equal. Too bad no one else's feels the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It couldn't possibly be that the conservative run media wants women to just stop fighting and allow all their garbage kinda like in the old days?
It appears they are still trying to "stick  to a woman whether she wants it or not" huh?
DON'T WORRY YOUR PRETTY LITTLE HEAD MEN KNOW WHAT YOU NEED 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dragoness
on
Fri 03/16/12 04:27 PM
|
|
There were lots of women at the desks that met the public.
All that had to be said was that she wanted to speak to a woman and one would have been provided for her. She could have stopped a woman outside if she needed to. We dealt with humans so we dealt with all human issues. There are many many human issues. But calling ahead would have been a great idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In your example, yes we would have accommodated a rape victim. In order to accomodate a rape victim you would have to not hire men. Wouldn't that be discriminatory against men? And, what about the man who was abused by his mother his whole childhood? He won't want to see any women. Perhaps we could simply automate everything so people didn't have to deal with people at all. Wait, we already do that on the phone and it doesn't usually work so well. It is not hard to do. All we had to do was not allow men to address her and make sure she felt safe with the women who helped her. We didn't have to discriminate to do that. Still a moot point here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
And Ron Paul..............
|
|
I signed a petition for Ron Paul. It was about adding the Libertarian party to the ballot. I signed because I will do anything to get rid of this 2 party system, and yes I know you can be an independent but we all know it's pointless when it comes to elections. I want people to stop looking at what party they belong to first and judging them second and start judging our candidates based squarely on the person running. As soon as you throw Rep or Dem in the conversation people get biased. That's why Ron Paul is the only person I'd vote for, he's something different from the usual Reps and Dems. If it takes so many parties being added to the ballot that they have to get rid of parties all together, I'll consider it a win. Considering he is almost an anarchist, I could never vote for him. He is a lunatic worse than what we have had. Which is pretty bad. By your statement someone would have to also be a "lunatic" to vote for him? That being the case, many veterans and serving soldiers are lunatics, as well as me, most of my family and friends, 1/2 the students in colleges, many professors and educators, and many millions of others who believe his views, actions and words to symbolize patriotism, honesty, integrity and wisdom. From my house, your world would seem very small by comparison, as a veteran, I could vote NO other, as a father, he has given the only answers that5 give me hope for the futures of my children and my childrens children, as a patriot, his stance on the constitution, liberty and the rule of law are the only sane ones offered by ANY candidate. So call me a lunatic, I fought for your right to do so, but don't besmerch a great man for his views as being one! Yea the good ole guilt trip. I suppose it works for some. Not this one. Ron Paul is a lunatic. If you want to call yourself one for following him, that is your business. I never said that. I cannot vote for this lunatic that would surely tear this country down. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
