Community > Posts By > freud69

 
no photo
Fri 10/16/09 09:05 PM

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
OMG those are all great.. I don't know if I can pick just one.. If you make me I will force myself... :laughing:


ok....you are making me.......PICK ONE NOW GODDAMMIT!rant pitchfork slaphead

no photo
Fri 10/16/09 09:03 PM

I have once had an relationship w/ an older women before, I'm wondering, who else here has done that as well?


Can honestly say i have never cradlesnatched before....

must admit though...the older i am getting the more attractive it looks...

viagra only lasts so long....grumble grumble grumble grumble

no photo
Fri 10/16/09 09:00 PM

I would!

But then I am a bit of a meanie...ask anybody.

a real B i t c h ....

Slow...painful... and polite....an email every ten minutes....


pitchfork :laughing: waving





you kill me girl....didnt know Machiavelli had a sister!

LMFAO

Like your style....shades

no photo
Fri 10/16/09 08:58 PM
Taking people for granted is sadly something we do best...

nice thought, nice sentiment though...drinker

no photo
Fri 10/16/09 08:54 PM

send 20 different mails....

rofl


and I don't know if the locals know what numbnut is...

(we can't speak Orstraylyan here... they dont understand us):wink: laugh


laugh :banana: drinks drool :laughing: rofl waving

oooohhhhh you are SO NASTY....lmao...20 different emails!

and i thought I was MEAN....

NUMNUT = MORON = IDIOT = WOFTAM

no photo
Fri 10/16/09 08:48 PM
I have a serious (SO NOT) dilemma and was wondering if you all could provide some help to make a decision.......

I have received an email from some numnut where it is painfully obvious that the little cherub has a pre prepared script to send to unsuspecting victims….

The email is full of all sorts of wonderful nonsense and has specified areas where I am positive he just does a 'find and replace' to insert his victims names…only problem is he hasnt found and replaced in all the right areas and there are one or two references to other names...

The problem is in deciding how to respond to this luddite….and I thought that perhaps you might help me choose something suitable out of what i have come up with so far…alternatively you may come up with a better one of which I will be all ears…

Response Options are (my favourites are 3, 4 and 8):

1. Kindness and compassion:

My dear friend….whilst I appreciate how difficult it must be having to look up the spelling and/or meaning of every word you need to type before you type it…a pre-prepared response does not show you to be the spontaneous, impulsive and free thinking individual I am sure you are…might I suggest you stick to just sending nudges only….that way you only have to tick a box and spare yourself the agony of trying to figure out how to copy and paste...

ps - I've added a link to websters online dictionary to assist you with any words you do not understand in my email. You will also note that there is an additional link on this website - 'originality for dummies'….I am sure it will provide a wealth of wisdom for you if you ever manage to get over the terrifying thought of having to do something new...

2. Sarcasm:

Thanks so much for your prefabricated email….i just luuuvvvv the fact that you plan ahead and are prepared in life for any eventuality! You must have won 'Scout of the Year' award ten times over!

3. Nastiness:

Rack off moron - if I wanted something pre-written I would have waited for your obituary...

4. Vindictiveness

Dear Moron - thank you for the pre-written script. Since you love sharing the same information to all and sundry I thought I would post your email on a noticeboard and ask the whole world to give their opinion as to what level of idiot you are…should make for a far more interesting read than anything I would ever get from you…

5. Sympathy:

….gosh it must be so hard trying to think of something new to write when you only have three active neurons…you poor thing…life must be such a struggle…no wonder you are on mingle…

6. Empathy

I have been trying so hard to put myself in your shoes - and I have found it really really difficult - all these new words and thoughts and feelings just kept flying into my brain and no matter how hard I tried I just couldn’t get myself to master the art of regurgitating the same stuff over and over and over again - but don’t worry - I think I have found a way!....I figure if I get paralytic drunk every day for the next fifty years eventually I will be able to kill enough brain cells that I will get alcohol related brain damage and perseveration will be a way of life!....if you are prepared to hang around until 2059 I think you and I could have a great life together!

7. Wounded:

You have soooo broken my heart…if you knew the thrill of excitement that tingled it's way up and down my body when I saw your name come up on an email…from the tips of my toes to my soft supple thighs to my heaving breasts and parted soft, moist, cherry red lips….only to find that I am not your 'one and only' and you are sharing yourself with everybody <sob>….how will I ever recover from such torment….???? I think I will just have to go kill myself….

8. Indifference

Thank you for your pre-prepared/automated email.

Please note that this is an automated response. A pre-prepared message will be forwarded to you shortly.

If in 24 hours you do not receive this message please hit the 'reply to' button and select one of the following options:

Option 1. - Select 'I want some attention please'

An automated nudge will be sent to you with the message "Hey baby...if you could just move that ego of yours over an inch or two there might be room for me".

Option 2. - Select 'I would like to speak to a customer service officer'.

An automated chat request will be sent to you. You will be provided three minutes of chat time to air your grievances with a chat room autobot. Please note that the autobots available responses are currently limited at this time but do include such timeless classics as 'I love you', 'you make me horny'. 'I cant live without you' and 'I have never felt this way about anyone before'

Option 3. - Select 'I want a proper response god dammit'.

A copy of this email will be forwarded to you within 24 hours of this message being sent.

If in 24 hours you do not receive a pre-prepared message, kiss response, chat request, or copy of this email please contact your mingle account manager and advise that you have received the following error message:

"Hi Loser…you have just wasted ten minutes of your time by sending an email to someone who just doesn’t give a damn".

9. Childishness

Awww…that’s NO FAIR….you gave the same information to everyone else before me….I want MY OWN email….I want one JUST FOR ME…and if you don’t give me one I will scream and scream and scream until I am sick….im going to tell on you…..MUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMM….HE'S BEING MEAN TO ME…HE'S TREATING ME JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE…I WANT TO BE SPECIAL..WAAAHHHHHHH.

And last…..but not least….

10. Encouragement:

Thank you so much for all the pre-prepared information that you have shared with me….you are such an interesting fellow….BUT IT JUST ISNT ENOUGH…all of those thoughtful insightful and interesting things you talked about….and you didn’t explain ANY of them….I would really appreciate it if you would go through your pre-prepared email and add an additional 100 words per paragraph explaining what each pre-prepared statement means - don’t forget to use lots of pre-prepared colourful adjectives and verbs - and throw in a few overused clichés for good measure as well…oh and I really don’t mind if these additional words are pre-prepared as well…originality does absolutely nothing for me you know…

Ps - one more thing…don’t worry about doing the find/replace for the name fields…I will answer to just about anything….really I will….


What am i to do????.....So many delicious choices and i only get to pick one of them...

got any suggestions?



no photo
Fri 10/16/09 08:30 PM



So, let me get this straight. You did an experiment in which you posted pictures of yourself online, one where you looked so-so, and the picture was in black and white, and one where you looked pretty, and used a color photo.

The experiment results revealed that men, who are browsing online, and have nothing to go by but a picture and a blurb of text, found your good-looking picture more appealing than the so-so one?

I have one response to this.

Well, DUH!



well geez... when you put it that way ... whoa laugh
wtf?? overthinking is dangerous to your health! don't try too hard to be smart, and freud was a coke head by the way!!!


agree with the cokehead quote....doesnt change the fact that he popularised psychology for the masses.....and look at the mess we are in now.....

responses are for the most part amazing.....refreshing to see that people do have opinions out there and actually do think...(for the most part...).....thoroughly enjoyed the read and appreciate the time people took to state their point of view....even the ones i dont agree with....drinks

no photo
Fri 10/16/09 12:00 AM




WHAT ABOUT PUTTING COMEDY WITH IT??????????????


:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Lustful comedy!!!!
drool drool drool flowers flowers smitten smitten rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


damn! believe me....some of my sexual encounters have had plenty of comedy in it.....you lot ought to be issued with an instruction booklet at the onset of puberty....

no photo
Thu 10/15/09 11:51 PM




I think men are total visual fools!! Jk

That's why the sex industry is as big as it is and almost all of it. Almost. Is geared to men

They just love to look
So what

Put up pics YOU WANT them to see

And let them enjoy !:heart:


And women are total audio fools. Generally, men are attracted by what they see; women by what they hear. Since talking is easier and cheaper than doing, in that regard at least, men have the advantage, one of the few that we as men have left. Wouldn't it be nice if men and women didn't play so many games? Ah, but would life be any fun without the games?


Um, who told you this? huh I'm not attracted by what I hear, I'm attracted by what I see. If a guy is hideous, he can talk til he's blue in the face, I won't be interested.


I knew this would happen, sometimes a post just requires a closer reading, lol. Read my post again, if you like, and notice I used the word "generally" at the beginning of my statement, thereby exonerating myself from any and all charges of making an absolute statement. And to the degree that I know what I'm talking about, it is not because I was "told" anything, but because I am smart enough and experienced enough to know, without anyone having to tell me.


damn .....that one neuron of yours really is working overtime....must be hard for it to be two things at once - BLACK and WHITE.....gee hope you dont overstress it and introduce the concept of GREY....btw .....you still havent told me what bridge you are hiding under....

no photo
Thu 10/15/09 11:47 PM

I think men are total visual fools!! Jk

That's why the sex industry is as big as it is and almost all of it. Almost. Is geared to men

They just love to look
So what

Put up pics YOU WANT them to see

And let them enjoy !:heart:


damn best piece of advice i've heard from anyone on here!!!!!!


at last....intelligent life has landed......

no photo
Wed 10/14/09 12:02 PM


:heart: Should there be lust in a relationship?:heart:


nope....not if you like being in love with your brother......uuuugggghhhh

yep....if you want to keep it healthy.....lots and lots of biological reasons....orgasms release endorphins which make you happier, healthier, more well adjusted and less stressed......lust is the happy pill that god prescribed for free....best drug money CANT buy...:banana:

no photo
Wed 10/14/09 11:57 AM

i recently went out on a date with a girl i really like, this was about a week ago, we kissed at the end of the date, so i assumed it went well. we have been texting for the last week and made plans for this past weekend, but she said something came up at work and then rescheduled for sunday. sunday came around and she canceled again saying family came on a surprise vist, i was fine with it. we continued texting but when i try to call her she never answers my phone calls. what should i do should i continue texting her or should i just forget about it?


seems you are suffering from the 'too nice...too available...too eager' syndrome....send her to coventry for a few days (ie no contact)....she'll be beating down your door in no time....women can be just as shallow as men...people like her are often afraid of commitment....even committing for a coffee...the fun is in the game....the chase....once it gets close to getting the prize they get bored and lose interest....so be prepared to keep playing hard to get if you want this one...

my advice though as a female who hates the game playing thing - drop her like a hot potato.,..there are lots of other nice women out there who dont do that crapshades

no photo
Wed 10/14/09 01:19 AM

:heart: Have you ever wished you hadn't fallen in love?:heart:


nope.......luuuuuvvvvv........being in love....

its the falling out that hurts......tears

no photo
Wed 10/14/09 01:17 AM


am conducting a 'social experiment' if you will on another site after becoming incredibly suspicious that yes men just look at the pictures and no further....

the profile i have seems to be getting plenty of hits and have had lots of contact...then it came to the photos....

i have a choice of several photos - one taken at the end of a six year old birthday party after a week of working fourteen hour days - it is in black and white and i am wearing absolutely zip makeup - the photo i think is quite ok for an 'a la naturale' look and shouldnt scare anyone away

the second photo is of course in colour - and i am wearing makeup - you can tell it is the same person but this is quite an attractive photo...

the experiment?

i alternate btw sending the black and white photo and the colour one

no prizes for guessing which one gets the most responses

what amuses me no end though is that all these men absolutely insist that 'looks' are not 'that important'....it is a brain they are looking for - someone with a sense of humour, an intelligent mind, who is caring and compassionate and who has their shite together

blah blah blah....

oh and btw - it doesnt matter if they are 'ugly' men or 'good looking' men (if you subscribe to an aesthetic point of view' - they all go for the pretty photo...

the next part of the experiment - i will make contact again with those that didnt respond to the plain photo by sending them the pretty one...

lets just wait and see if they respond to that...if they do...it proves me correct...you really are a shallow species...



Go treat a short, fat, old and ugly homeless man to dinner and a movie, then take him to bed. After that, tell us all how enlightened you are.


btw - just wondering....are you called one mind cause you only have one neuron working...????

no photo
Wed 10/14/09 01:16 AM




youre still looking cute!

no photo
Wed 10/14/09 12:15 AM
Edited by freud69 on Wed 10/14/09 12:17 AM

Go treat a short, fat, old and ugly homeless man to dinner and a movie, then take him to bed. After that, tell us all how enlightened you are.


Hey I'll be in that.......so tell me.......what bridge are you living under now Onemind ?????love

no photo
Sun 10/11/09 12:31 PM

A slanted experiment from the outset, will achieve slanted results.

When out to confirm a theory, one usually looks for conclusive evidence to substantiate the theory....

Your theory is that men are shallow......so are out to prove your theory correct.

I disagree with your methodology....and if you find your theory substantiated.....who are you going to date?

Women? huh





let me correct one thing

it wasnt an experiment from the outset....for better or worse i am pretty much a person who takes people on face value and accept what they say (yeah yeah I know - idealism - idiocy - call it what you want but i prefer to have people prove me wrong than have me proven right - hence the post!)....I actually didnt believe that men are shallow - I hold to the belief that men are just like women at the base level - no one wants to be lonely - everyone wants someone to talk to - everyone wants someone to want to talk to them....nothing shallow about that....

the theory only arose after a pattern started to appear - at first I was only sending the black and white photo....I didnt even have a colour one available - and i was up front in advising that it was without any make up at all.......

notwithstanding that - EVERY experiment has a hypothesis and a theory to begin with....it is the RESULTS of the experiment that determine whether the theory and/or hypothesis is correct - not the other way around....

the experiment is not about whether people prefer pretty photos....it is about people not being up front about what they want (ooohhh ....theres that IDEALISM again...expecting honesty - sheesh what was i thinking!)......

and lastly - the experiment will not stop me from wanting to date men......it has just given me a bit more food for thought about this 'online' thing......whole new world for me......:wink:

no photo
Sat 10/10/09 03:56 PM


ONE intellectually stimulating woman in TEN YEARS??????.....you need to get out more methinks!


I'm actually more or less a recluse at this point.


as for generalisations - they exist because they serve a very real purpose - and can be a valuable tool in how we go about making sense of the world...and lets not forget that it stems from an innate instinct to survive....think about it...if ALL species didnt generalise none would be here...a deer meets meet one hungry lion and escapes...generalising that ALL lions are hungry and want to eat him is probably going to save that deers life...


The danger is in going too far with it, though, and I know I have occasionally been guilty of that.

It is relatively easy for me to say that I'm giving up on women entirely because it's clear that there is no one compatible out there. I've reached a point in my life where I've been through enough abominable relationships to see this as true.

At the same time, perhaps this particular generalization is faulty. I don't know.

Now, my generalization differs from yours in that yours is built on the concept of survival, which takes it to a much higher level. All I'm saying is that it may be possible that one misses out on something by overgeneralizing....





there is always a chance that something might be missed ....lets take it down a level then...the way i see it generalisations are always a good starting point...the trick is to continue to pay attention and look for any information that proves/disproves that generalisation...and people do that automatically..we constantly refit/reshape/redefine our perceptions of people based on our last experiences with them...i would never ever assert that a generalisation is the be-all-end-all....to do that would be shallow in the extreme....

i just get annoyed with people who take a shot at the generalisation thing with a 'holier than thou' attitude....everyone does it - generalise that is - and THAT is a generalisation I will defend to the hilt.....

it is a shame your glass is half empty....the only real failure a person can have in life is that that comes from giving up...

no photo
Sat 10/10/09 03:46 PM

:banana: Monkey pictures work good:banana:


and your monkey picture is sooooo cute!

no photo
Sat 10/10/09 03:43 PM



now where was that generalisation quote i had a shot at....hmmmm...LOL....laugh


Well, I'm just talking about people in the area I'm living. Which, to be honest, isn't entirely fair since I don't know anybody here, but I'm basing my assessment on the random bits & pieces I do have to work with.

I'm as anti-generalization as the next guy -- unless there's actually some truth behind it (I think referring to people as shallow, at least in the sense of the majority, is probably entirely legitimate, whether they'll admit it or not) -- but I've met one intellectually stimulating woman (in real life) in the last 10 years, so I do have some historical support here!

Probably should put up a disclaimer though....it's a limited statistical sampling....



ONE intellectually stimulating woman in TEN YEARS??????.....you need to get out more methinks!

as for generalisations - they exist because they serve a very real purpose - and can be a valuable tool in how we go about making sense of the world...and lets not forget that it stems from an innate instinct to survive....think about it...if ALL species didnt generalise none would be here...a deer meets meet one hungry lion and escapes...generalising that ALL lions are hungry and want to eat him is probably going to save that deers life...