Community > Posts By > dontlookatme
Topic:
The anything goes thread
|
|
Okay, so here is the deal. The 1st person to answer this blog gets to
ask me any question, no matter how crazy, inappropriate, sexual, or just random, and I promise to answer it 100% truthfully. The catch is now that person is now tagged and the next person gets to ask him/her any question, etc. etc. This should be fun. Keep it in good spirits and fun!! |
|
|
|
Topic:
Strong
|
|
well at least they let you finish the coarse!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Topic:
hello
|
|
welcome
|
|
|
|
Topic:
How can god be so great...
|
|
Nobody wants to debate god so if this is your decision then until you
seek a higher ground and not a debate, then the christians will do as instructed and that is: do not argue with a fool in his folly or he shall be as the fool. This only starts something that will never end. We don't have to defend the higher power no do we have to debate it with you. I mean this in no disrespect as not all of us were put here to do any certian thing as the other. Not all of us were put here to believe as well as some of us were put here to do right by god as best we can. I can go on and on why I feel like I do but that is a complete waste of my time. |
|
|
|
Topic:
serious question folks
|
|
you can google all your information like I just did there in that page.
democrats vs republican |
|
|
|
Topic:
serious question folks
|
|
"Vote-Smart" is the premier, non-partison organization in a America
dedicating to collecting and disseminating objective data to enable voters in America to be as informed of possible in their voting. To obtain the ratings for the parties as described here, and so provide informed answers to the question or how similar or dissimilar the Democratic and Republican parties are, the most recent reports for every special interest group listed at www.Vote-Smart.Org were reviewed and aggregated into averages according to each group's individual ratings of the Congressmembers of the two parties. The whole purpose of these groups is to know the two parties inside and out, to try to influence the votes of their congress members, and to keep score as to which congress members their own groups members should be told to reward and supported and which which need to be opposed and punished. Job Growth Rates under recent presidents: President % Growth in # years Johnson (D) 3.8% in 5 Carter (D) 3.1% in 4 Clinton (D) 2.4% in 8 Kennedy (D) 2.3% in 3 Nixon (R) 2.3% in 5 Reagan (R) 2.1% in 8 Bush-I (R) 0.6% in 4 ( Bureau of Labor Statistics ) Of particular interest is whether the average ratings for the parties fall above or below fifty percent for each group -- that is, whether the party votes with the wishes of a given special interest group more often than not or whether the party votes against that group's wishes more often than it does with them. After combining these ratings in this way, the question then becomes whether any difference can be seen in the way the two parties vote. Do the numbers reveal any useful information about the parties' voting patterns? Is there a reason for those disillusioned with the political process to hope? And the answer? A profound, emphatic, resounding, definite: YES! Yes, there is a huge chasm between the way most of the members of the two major parties vote on many issues. Vote-Smart.org lists 107 different ratings. Of these, fully 93 found the parties stratified on either side of the fifty percent mark, one supporting a particular interest, and the other opposed to that same interest. Furthermore, not only did an overwhelming majority of groups find the parties to be on opposite sides of their issues, but the difference between their positions is normally huge. The average spread between the ratings that any group assigned to the parties was 55 percentage points. The parties do not simply differ slightly on the issues-- they often differ like night and day. What's most instructive are the particular groups that found the parties to be voting with their wishes. Looking at those groups, together with their self-described missions produces a composite view of the positions of the parties. I have not updated the figures on this page since the year 2002, but there hasn't been any need to do so because the purpose of this page is to highlight the contrast between the two parties, and if anything that contrast has only grown in the period since this study was made. The most glaring disparity between the parties is regarding organized labor. Sixteen different labor unions provide ratings of Congressmembers' voting, and all 16-- every last one-- found that the Democratic Party voted in favor of the interests of the working men and women that they represent, while the Republican Party voted against those interests. In fact, the most common rating individual Democrats in Congress received from labor unions was a perfect 100 percent-- voting with that union every time. In stark contrast, the most common rating any individual Republican received was a perfect zero, never voting with that union even once. For example, of the 261 Democrats in Congress that the United Food and Commercial Workers union rated in 2001, 206 received a perfect 100 percent rating. In contrast, of the 269 Republicans in Congress the UFCW rated in 2001, 232 received an unqualified zero. It's as if the Republican Party has declared outright warfare on working people in this country. "But what about business?" might come the rejoinder. When that general charge has been expressed more narrowly, it translates to: "The Democrats and the Republicans are just two branches of the Business Party." The facts show how totally untrue that charge is, and coming at this matter from opposite points of view, business and labor both say the same thing, i.e. that Republicans favor business interests, while Democrats favor workers interests. Five different special interest groups are listed as representing business on Vote-Smart.org, and all five found the Republicans to vote with their interests while the Democrats vote against them. As demonstrated by their voting records, Democrats are viewed by working people, women, seniors, African-Americans, Hispanics and consumers as the advocates for just and equitable working conditions, for civil rights, for protecting the environment, for reproductive freedom, for gun control, for education, for public health, and for humanitarian social policy. And the Republicans? The Republicans are viewed by big business opponents of taxes on business, or those who benefit most from business and opponents of government services to any entity other than businesses, as services require taxation to pay for them. Perhaps they can best be defined by what they're against, rather than what they're for: they are against all those groups and all those social aims that the Democrats serve. |
|
|
|
Topic:
New here...
|
|
Good luck in your search!
|
|
|
|
Topic:
New to the site
|
|
good morning everyone and thank you for the warm and enriching welcomes!
|
|
|
|
emmmmmmm hot coffee just like I like my men! lol ok i need to go back
to bed!!!lol enjoy your day |
|
|
|
Topic:
New to the site
|
|
Thank you everybody. I'm always up for chat when I have time to stop by.
So far, I think I like it here-lol |
|
|
|
Topic:
Need help
|
|
And........save everything you want to a cd or external like she said.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Need help
|
|
I'm no computer geek but I do design websites and graphics. I would say
junk it out. It's not even worth upgrading. The man I work with works on puters. I've never heard anything good about the older systems. Most have run so far out of memory that you start to forget who you are-lol |
|
|
|
Topic:
Hello all
|
|
hello and nice to meet you
|
|
|
|
Topic:
New to the site
|
|
thank you ms teddy
|
|
|
|
Topic:
New to the site
|
|
Just saying hello and inviting you all to stop by. Best wishes!
|
|
|